
This is what I don’t get.
If Joe Kent is going to resign by accusing President Trump of being tricked by Israel into war with Iran…
If Kent is going to claim there’s no threat from Iran…
If Kent is going to claim there was a “foreign nexus” to the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation that he was not allowed to investigate…
And if he’s going to do this publicly on X, on Tucker, on Candace…
WHY ISN’T HE SHOWING EVIDENCE?!
Why on earth should we take his word for it if he won’t bring receipts?
If his salacious claims are as real as he says—he’s willing to publicly resign in a blaze of his own supposed glory, acting as if it’s great personal sacrifice to disclose this info to YOU by humiliating the President and insisting Trump is weak and stupid enough to be manipulated by Israel—why won’t he show proof?
EVIDENCE, please.
But he’s got… nothing.
All he does is appear on the two shows that are coincidentally the largest audiences in the country while also being the least likely to actually ask him, “Joe, what’s the proof of any of this?”
Doesn’t add up to me.
Looks an awful lot like he’s pouring gasoline on the fire of the hottest conspiracy theory before he gets potentially prosecuted for leaking classified information.
English






































