DandanSoo@Doh_KyungSooSoo
Your post was the source of misinformation and misinterpretation of the fans about this "pooled accounting" system (which was never proven even true).
This has caused the fans to assume that all members shared profits from their solo activities. They made false narratives out of it and throw hateful posts to other EXO members. You can literally read the quote retweets of your post and you'll see my point.
That is the main reason I posted that article about EXO members themselves stating otherwise. That was a response to those false narratives and hateful posts.
As for this clarification post of yours, it is also important to also disclose the facts about this case and not just one-sided statement from INB10O.
“Thinking that this would clearly become a legal issue, I requested settlement data from my clients. In particular, Article 14 of the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act mandates that accounting books regarding popular culture planning and compensation must be maintained separately. I even had doubts as to whether SM was conducting proper accounting.
Even from this statement from INB100, it is clear that it was their personal suspicion and doubts that led them to think that there was no "proper accounting" conducted. "SUSPICION" and "DOUBT" not FACT.
Then this suspicion was brought to PROPER GOVERNING AUTHORITIES (namely Seoul Court, Supreme Court and The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) by INB100.
As for the document submission order of CBX settlement data for the past 13 years, both Seoul Court and Supreme Court dismissed the case.
Seoul Court:
The court rejected most of their requests, saying, "The application for the document submission order in this case is sought and comprehensive by specifying the settlement data through document submission order, etc. without specifying the existence and scope of the unpaid settlement money."
INB100 appealed to Supreme Court...
RESULT:
Supreme Court decided to dismiss the trial.
As for the request asking to view and register documents such as accounting books related to settlement:
Seoul Court:
This case application is being maintained to use this case application as a convenient way to achieve the purpose of document submission or to psychologically pressure SM."
INB100 appealed to Supreme Court
RESULT:
Supreme Court decided to dismiss the trial.
As for the case of violation of Article 14, Paragraph 2 of the Popular Culture and Art Industry Development Act (obligation to disclose the accounting book).
Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism:
No violation by stating that "through face-to-face investigation and submitted evidence, it was confirmed that SM periodically disclosed data related to settlement to artists in accordance with exclusive contracts and the Popular Culture Industry Act".
These are all actual court dismissals and facts that are important to know by the fans so they can have their objective take about this matter.
I deliberately did not include statement from SM side so you can save all your "company stan" allegation to yourself.
I rest my case.
