@d16b0lical@BobasoyNPC@chrisschmitz If they tested them on moving targets they know we’d see the miss bc we can see every missile launch on the planet. And have been able to for half a century.
@teortaxesTex The recent purging of the majority of the j-20 design team would beg to differ. Right after the failure of Chinese radars in all 3 conflicts it’s been used in. Could the two be linked? What was used to test the stealth detecting radar? Oh, the non-stealth j-20?
@reddit_lies@teortaxesTex Yea I mean that’s obviously what happened. “We optimized the general shape of a plane based on guesses for purposes it wasn’t designed for or struggled with.” China hasn’t even made 1 stealth plane. The plane they thought was stealth was only stealth on their shitty radars.
@teortaxesTex I find it rather suspect that China would have sub-milimeter 3D models of the X-47B.
More than likely China hand-derived these models from public images, introducing a crazy amount of error that the solver then "optimized"
@PetePiranio@torbenmarkp The true cost is in the bases and defense of Europe. 60 billion per year. He’s trying to get the us people and congress ok with the idea of ditching most European bases. Europe fell right into the trap.
@PetePiranio@torbenmarkp Well I mean yea he could walk over to Joe Bidens house and shoot him as well. But he’s not going to because it’s against the law. In both cases.
@PetePiranio@torbenmarkp Believe it or not, everything he does inside America is strongly backed by our laws bc he knows every action he takes will be contested in the courts and will be easily reversed if there is no legal standing.
@chrisschmitz Ahh yes, precise calculations from estimations of a new plane no one has measured yet. Putting the x-47 on there just lets you know this is completely fake. Oh, you made calculations on a plane that has never been seen before? With no images even released?