CricketDiane

If governments were actually doing their job, this Palantir document 👇 wouldn't be a manifesto they proudly boast about, but a clear sign of the urgent need to purge its software from the public institutions it has infiltrated. What are they saying, essentially? They basically promote a clash of civilization worldview in which there exists a "they" - the supposed enemies of Western civilization, whose cultures the document codes as inferior - and a "we" who must stop indulging in decadent restraint and invest massively in AI weapons and defense software (which conveniently makes Palantir's product catalog the civilizational cure). Look at point 4 for instance. They write that "the limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software." It all rests on a pretty massive assumption: that coexistence is impossible. Why would "free and democratic societies" (by which they obviously mean Western-style liberal-democracies) need to "prevail"? Why can't they simply coexist with other civilizations or political systems out there? Nowhere in the document do they defend this assumption: it's simply asserted as the starting condition of the argument. But it's the entire ballgame: if civilizations and political systems can coexist - as they largely have, imperfectly but recognizably, throughout history - then the entire case they make in the document evaporates. In fact one can argue that, studying history, the big problem was not that civilizations couldn't coexist: it was that, from time to time, one of them decided that others were inferior, threatening, or standing in the way of its rightful expansion - and acted accordingly. So many catastrophes and so much human suffering in history trace back not to the fact of plural civilizations, but to one of them deciding it could no longer tolerate the others. The problem, in other words, has almost always been exactly the worldview Palantir is now selling. Their manifesto isn't warning against the cause of some of the worst periods in history: it's arguing for reviving them! Or take point 15: they explicitly call for the re-armament of Germany and Japan, and an end to "Japanese pacifism". Basically undoing one of the foundational settlements of the post-WW2 order. I mean, think about the insanity of this for a second: a private company - unelected, answerable only to its shareholders - is casually proposing to overturn the security architecture of two continents. A settlement that took a world war, and tens of millions of dead to establish. Why do they propose this? There is obviously a commercial motivation: a remilitarized Germany and Japan are massive new defense-software markets. But the more troubling answer is that point 15 fits into the ideological project the rest of the manifesto lays out - a civilizational contest requires a consolidated Western bloc, and pacifist members are a liability in such a contest. So taking a step back we now have what's the most influential defense-software company in the world, with its code deeply embedded in all the machinery of Western states - intelligence agencies, militaries, police forces, welfare systems, border controls - openly outing itself as an ideological project. They're effectively saying "our tools aren't meant to serve your foreign policy. They're meant to enforce ours." Because, worryingly, that's what they CAN do. Palantir software is all about basically telling states: "these are your threats, these are the people and groups to watch, these are the patterns that matter, these are the targets that warrant action." For instance the DGSI - the French intelligence services - use Palantir (see: x.com/RnaudBertrand/…): do you honestly think the software is warning them about, say, the NSA tapping the phones of French government officials? About the weaponization of US extraterritorial law against French companies? Did it warn them about the AUKUS ambush that cost France a sixty-billion-euro submarine contract? Obviously not. And that's exactly what the manifesto is saying. They've positioned themselves as advocates of Western civilizational unity, so their software can't undermine it. The ideological position and the product roadmap have to align, or the whole project falls apart. This makes their software not only deeply dangerous for the world as a whole but also, almost by definition, for any country using it. When it comes to your security as a state, it is primordial you base yourself on truth as opposed to ideology. The entire point of an intelligence agency is to tell its government what is true, not what your so-called "allies'" defense contractors would like you to see. A state that outsources its threat assessment to a company with an explicit ideological agenda is not gathering intelligence, it is essentially subscribing to propaganda. The conclusion couldn't be more obvious. Every government still running Palantir software in its intelligence, security, or public-service infrastructure needs to start ripping it out, now! Lest they want to be embarked on the delusional and deeply destructive clash-of-civilizations crusade Palantir has now openly committed itself to.

Hezbollah said it detonated explosives against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, claiming four tanks were destroyed near Deir Siryan, in what would be its first reported attack since the ceasefire began.

Europe must have its own defense system against ballistic missiles, and Ukraine is already discussing its creation with several countries, says Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy [@ZelenskyyUa].

American science is shrinking. 
A Post analysis found that, halfway through this fiscal year, the number of competitive grants awarded by the National Institutes of Health is down by more than half compared with the same period last year. wapo.st/3OgoHKV

Congressmen should work for:

These are the indicative estimates of Russia’s combat losses as of April 20, according to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Impeachment is not enough. Removal is not enough. Arresting him is not enough. We need trials, and convictions for him any everyone in his cabinet.

A stray orange cat in Thailand moved into a bar. The owners got him a QR code so that customers can buy him food and cat treats.

❗️Warriors from Ukrainian Defense Intelligence launched strikes on two Russian large landing ships and a Russian radar system in Russian-occupied Crimea on April 19. These are Yamal (about $80 million) and Nikolay Flichenkov (about $70 million) landing ships that are used to transport armored vehicles and troops. The destroyed Podlet-k1 radar is about $5 million. Glory!

LONDON, April 17 (Reuters) - The world has lost over $50 billion worth of crude oil that has not been produced since the Iran ‌war began and the aftershock of the crisis will be felt for months and even years to come, according to analysts and Reuters calculations.

Ukraine have successfully hit overnight Russias Tuapse oil refinery which produces alone 8 percent of the countries oil. Massive hit…

Sweden has intelligence that Russia is systematically manipulating data to fool Ukraine’s western allies into believing its economy withstood the strain of its lavish war spending and western sanctions, head of Swedish military intelligence Nilsson said. ft.com/content/04a9d0…

EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE US GOVERNMENT WILL BE REMEMBERED AS FUCKING COWARDS AND TRAITORS 🖐️🖐️

Commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a virtual standstill after a brief and confused reopening over the weekend bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

He is a good Pope.

Facts about Pope Leo XIV >IQ: 145 >Speaks 7 languages >Former professor >Degrees in mathematics & theology >Missionary in Peru for +10 years >First American Pope >Known for humility and intellectual capabilities This is the ideal leader of the church

If no agreement is reached on Iran's missile program, another round against Iran, to hit their missile industry, is viewed as quite probable in Israel within a few years. - Israeli Army Radio

Israel sees an Iran with thousands of missiles as a "red line", and if Iran crosses it, "an attack against it is required". - Israeli Army radio

looka the guy far right looking at Trump!