Ryan Reacts

@Sargon_of_Akkad @BretWeinstein If you read or listened to any accounts from the first go round, you would have known that Trump tried to do this shit the first time but his cabinet and handlers stopped him. As far as his rhetoric goes, he always spoke out of both sides of his mouth. This isn't a revelation.

@BretWeinstein I don't think any of us expected this full-throated neocon turn, given Trump's consistent anti-war rhetoric, right up until early 2025.

Trump, who I advocated for in 2024, has gone full "mad king." In considering my responsibility, I'd ask you to remember: The case I made rested on the fact that Biden/Harris were figureheads, shielding a cabal that couldn't be held to account, whereas Trump could. And we must.

@_DeeWorld_ @SaltyGoat17 Okay, doing it directly didn't work so here's a link. You can read about it if you actually care to learn. x.com/i/grok/share/7…

@SaltyGoat17 They always try to pull that bullshit that the party's switch though. I don't even know how to answer someone that stupid.

Don't let Democrats lie to you about who they are!! It's who they've ALWAYS BEEN!!!

@_DeeWorld_ @SaltyGoat17 @grok Would you mind providing this fellow with a quick summary of the party alignment switch involving the Democrats and Republicans during the early 20th Century?

@mitchellvii This is a rerun. I've seen this episode before in 2002.

Marco Rubio just delivered one of the clearest, most forceful explanations I've heard on why President Trump struck Iran and I have to say, the man is brilliant! He broke it down in plain English that even the media can't twist: Iran is controlled by religious fanatic lunatics obsessed with nuclear weapons, backed by missiles, drones, and terrorism to make themselves untouchable. Rubio highlighted how weak they are right now after losing so much capability, making this the perfect moment to dismantle their arsenal before they cross the point of no return in a year or so. I admire Secretary Rubio tremendously for his sharp intellect, unwavering clarity, and rock-solid defense of America's decisive action - this is the kind of leadership that keeps the world safer.

@WWESuperCard It's kind of funny watching others accusing Supercard of giving him Carlito's gimmick. Flip the script man, Carlito took from Razor. youtube.com/watch?v=WPQCcU…

You want to be like Razor? You got to DO like Razor, chico. A new Razor Ramon BattlePass becomes available today after the update.

@Sassafrass_84 When Republicans read, "1984," they see it as an aspirational tale apparently.

War Powers Act of 1973 - Federal law (Public Law 93-148, codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548) passed by Congress and enacted on November 7, 1973. The president doesn't need your authorization. Consult, yes. Authorization no. Spare me the fake outrage. Crickets when Obama did it.

@elonmusk There is no such thing as a common culture. If you have multiple people living in the same area, you have multiple cultures. People are not robots and are not all the same. The one thing that people don't die for is a culture foisted upon them by peer pressure.

For a country to survive, there has to be a common culture. Nobody dies to defend a “multicultural economic zone”! American culture, with its English-Scotts-Irish origin, is great and worth fighting for. Some may not realize it, but that’s why people come here. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@Sadie_NC The elections are already secure; you're only problem with them is that sometimes you lose. Piss off. If you want to win more, stop being terrible.

The four remaining Senators who have not signed onto the SAVE Act. Why? Why are they holding up securing our elections? What do the Democrats have on them, or is it just their hate for President Trump?

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 You mean the lady who turned away from the officer who jumped in front of it to get a better shot? Yes, that officer's intent was clear; she gave him lip so he decided to silence her for it.

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 And the crazy lady who drove her vehicle at a federal agent clearly made clear what her intent was. I get it now. So Babbit did it, and got smoked. Explains why the lady in the car and the dude who was a nurse also got smoked. 👍

Say it again for the liberals in the back.

@Salt_T1 @PhilthyRl @C_3C_3 Yeah, you keep saying it but don't provide jack shit to prove it. All you're doing is providing your fee-fees and tears as evidence. Even Trump Administration officials that were personally invested in finding fraud couldn't find any.

@PhilthyRl @C_3C_3 Stolen. Covid gave them the gateway for fraud. I said what I said.

Mail in ballots for the 6 POTUS elections: 2004: 15 million 2008: 23 million 2012: 27 million 2016: 33 million 2020: 70 million 2024: 49 million Anything stand out to you? Insane. Mail in ballots should only be for disabled and military. Make Election Day a national holiday.

I think this might be the first SuperBowl in which the MVP should be a kicker. Jason Meyers, you got this!

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 I don't need to assign intent. They told us what their intent was. They intended to stop the confirmation of the election results which is a crime. Impeding government function. Thus their trespassing with the intent of committing said other crime makes it felonious.

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 What else is fascinating? When it helps your argument, you treat “fear for their lives” as irrelevant, yet you were perfectly comfortable assigning intent with zero evidence. You can’t dismiss duress here while inventing intent there — that’s not law, it’s convenience.

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 I acknowledge the details but in the end, they don't mean anything. In any and all circumstances, the 1/6ers were trespassing with the intent to commit other crimes. Which in DC, counts as burglary. Which is a felony.

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 Ok. Say what you want but you are refusing to acknowledge all the details. Hey, no worries. You lefties do that when faced with facts but the cool thing about you? You engage in civil discourse and don’t resort to hurling insults. I respect that tremendously.

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 What makes zero sense? The guards are the employees, not the people in charge. The security guards at the local U-haul storage don't decide when the facility is open and when it is closed. Same thing applies to the US capitol. Guards letting them in means jack shit legally.

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 You make zero sense but what ever makes you feel good about your insane idea

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 And even if the guards let the crowd in without duress, it doesn't actually matter. The building was closed to the public at that time which meant their presence was inherently illegal. If the guards invited them in, that just means they're guilty of crimes too.

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 So now you are changing your stance and admitting that they were allowed in or escorted in. And then now it’s called riot control. Ok, I’ll play along. The shooting of Renee good after she struck a federal agent was riot control.

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 ...Second, actually letting violent rioters in and "escorting," them in, in some cases is a form of riot control. You encourage the invaders to go into one entrance in an attempt to clear other exits where people can be snuck out of the building. It's called crowd funneling.

@BronyForBernie @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 We will have to agree to disagree on this one. But this looks like protestors entering peacefully to me. 🤷🏻‍♂️ youtu.be/7W3dtj1p4HU

@oh54117055 @Scullyy02 @Sassafrass_84 Two things: First, remember what I said about officers letting people in just so they didn't wind up like their colleagues that were beaten and lying on the ground? Yeah, that...