Predator exposer

Trans men trans women and non-binary people are all valid, but I don't support all trans people. Some of you bitches are dumb as hell.

@RightWingCope And just like that sobriety

Would you rather leave your drink alone with Matt Gaetz or Eric Swalwell 😭

@theserfstv You're gonna give Peterson and aneurysm.

If you don't let us kill everyone we might need to use pronouns again

@speakoutsister They don't have to wheesht, no ones going to here them over the sound of crickets.

Five women Scotland..

@legaltweetz You were informed of the permanent effects of T before you had your first shot. Take some responsibility for your life and you might not look so fucking miserable all the time

At the Tigers game this afternoon. Before I transitioned when I was walking around as a masculine woman, I would get called “sir” and “he” a lot. However, I was busty, so that and my voice would immediately correct that person. I no longer have those sex markers. I no longer have breasts and I have the trademark FTM voice. Medical transition comes with permanent & irreversible damage.

@ems77_ @CattardSlim Hot..dog water

The Elon dog's build is almost identical

@CattardSlim Well yeah, heat causes his skin suit to expand

Eeyore escaped the tight grip of Disney and had to turn to transphobia to make a living.

@GeoRebekah I will remember all the people that missed Charlie. Then I will remember the one who didnt miss.

Losing the gun debate in the most brutal, public way possible.

@thetrueshelby You mean Funko Pop out babies

Erika Kirk. Katie Miller. They both have careers but want y’all to stay home and pop out babies 🙄

@SorenAldaco @JonniSkinner @IWF Everytime I see this guy the intro to Crazy Town's "Butterfly" pops into my head

"The question was never whether Skinner was telling the truth. The question is why so many people need him not to be." I spoke with @JonniSkinner on the campaign to discredit him. From my piece for @IWF: iwfeatures.com/commentary/aft…

@donoharm You say this like he had a come to jesus moment when the reality is the guy resigned in 2013. Your movement is disingenuous.

Former GLAAD president admits: “We were wrong to medicalize trans-identified children.” ‼️ In a recent podcast, the former head of GLAAD called for an end to trans youth medical procedures, acknowledging that the movement’s approach was misguided. He also made a bold appeal to drop the “T” from LGBTQ.

@Reunioninfrance @garylfrancione I'm really sick of my fellow trans women saying there's no such thing as cis women. Cis identities are just as valid as yours.

@CallHimAaron @garylfrancione No such thing as cis. Just women. Thankfully, most people agree that women deserve safety and privacy in male-free spaces and safety and fairness in sports.

The idea that it is inherently rightwing to support women's rights to exist as a sex class; to oppose homophobia and reject the idea that men can be lesbians; and to oppose telling children they were born in the "wrong bodies" is one of the most insane ideas of our insane time.

@DutchLGB You can just say queer

L - Lesbian = Sexuality G - Gay = Sexuality B - Bisexual = Sexuality T - Transgender = Gender identity You see the difference? Gender identity and sexuality don't mix, they clash. It's time for a divorce. #LGBWithoutTheT

@pixelprayer @sappholives83 account would be shuttered

BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X BAN PORN ON X

@FionaSmall @glinner you left to be less free. What a dipshit

@Haraldonx @mehdirhasan Can confirm, Donald Trump is a predator

@mehdirhasan At least 28 women haven publicly accused the Pedo in chief of sexual misconduct 😂 The pedo has lost a court case and is a legally labelled sexual predator 😂 Trump is also elevated as an Epstein class pedo now 😂 this will be his legacy.

More than two dozen women accused his father of some form of sexual misconduct. A jury found his father liable for sexual abuse.

@sheawilliamsy They're there in spirit

MASSIVE turn out for the toilet karen demo in Belfast today. Their hate will never take root on this island. I've seen bigger turnouts at the pro-israel rallies. Gorgeously pathetic 🤭

@dieworkwear That would be amazing

They should do that Jubilee show with the Pope. Like "1 Pope vs 20 Conservative Catholics on Twitter"

@iain_masterton Glad to have 5 squakers show up

Women Won’t Wheesht in Edinburgh today. One Year Later

@daniellismore J.K. Rowling is a predator

J.K. Rowling’s Case Against Trans People Falls Apart Under Basic Scrutiny J.K. Rowling’s writing on her site presents itself as cautious, evidence based and protective of women. It is none of those things in any reliable sense. It is a political essay built out of selective fear, anecdote, conflation and repeated framing tricks that turn a small and vulnerable minority into a public threat. Once the central claims are checked against mainstream psychological definitions, clinical guidance and the better available reviews, the structure gives way very quickly. The first problem is basic description. Rowling writes as though trans identity is a fashionable belief system imposed on reality. That is false. Major professional bodies continue to define gender identity as a person’s internal sense of gender and distinguish it from biological traits, expression and sexuality. That does not mean every clinical pathway is simple or that every policy question has one easy answer. It means the existence of trans people is not a fiction created by slogans or websites. It is a recognised human phenomenon described across medicine and psychology for years. Her second move is more political than scientific. She repeatedly folds trans women into a category of male risk and then treats that association as common sense. That is the engine of the piece. It asks readers to accept that recognition itself is dangerous. The trouble is that this is not evidence. It is suspicion dressed up as safeguarding. A rights claim by one group does not become invalid because another group can imagine its misuse. That logic would destroy the basis of civil protection in every direction. She also leans heavily on the idea that affirming trans people means suppressing women or erasing sex. That is another false construction. Recognising gender identity does not abolish sex based medicine, sex based data collection or serious discussion of violence against women. Clinical guidance and professional standards continue to treat sex related health needs as real while also recognising transgender patients as deserving of competent care. The claim that one can only defend women by rejecting trans people is not a medical conclusion. It is an ideological choice. On healthcare her essay suggests that trans identification is being irresponsibly indulged and that medicine has surrendered to fashion. The actual evidence base is more careful than either side’s loudest slogans. For adults, established clinical standards and recent reviews continue to support access to gender affirming care with assessment, informed consent and monitoring. Reviews published in 2024 and 2025 report that gender affirming interventions are associated overall with improved mental health, body satisfaction and quality of life, while also noting that evidence quality varies and further research is needed. That is a long way from the picture of mass delusion that Rowling promotes. For children and adolescents the picture is more contested and the honest position is narrower. The Cass Review in England and later NHS England work show that the evidence for some youth interventions remains limited and that services need stronger assessment, clearer pathways and better long term research. That supports caution and reform. It does not support broad hostility to trans people, nor does it justify using uncertainty in paediatric care as a weapon against trans adults or against social recognition itself. Rowling’s essay repeatedly makes that jump. It is a political jump, not a scientific one. She also gives the reader the impression that transition is commonly regretted and that medicine is running ahead of human reality. The best known systematic reviews do not support that picture. Regret after gender affirming surgery appears low in the published literature, including systematic reviews and more recent follow up work. That does not mean regret never happens or that every clinic gets