CrimsonFirestorm

Censorship is always wrong. No one should ever hurt or kill somebody for having a different opinion or speaking out. (RIP Charlie Kirk) Lolicon is NOT pedophilia. Japanese art and culture shouldn't be subject to Western modern liberal sensitivies. Friendship is gold.

@ChibiReviews Someone should remix Megalovania but with this guy's screeching as the soundfont.

This reeks of Reddit Mod energy

@ReadAFairytale @shyojo @darlingstrawbie Obviously the Ten Commandments still apply, but things like "you can't mix wool and linen in your fabrics" and "you need to stone your neighbors to death for worshipping false idols" clearly don't.

It is not this simple. The first New Covenant ecumenical council is recorded for us in Acts 15. Where Gentiles are instructed to obey those aspects of Leviticus, which Moses had commanded to "the sojourner and stranger among you." Large swaths of assumed biblical morality are contained in the Old Covenant texts that are not reiterated in the NT.

sorry for the long post. after a night of sleep and some more reflection i just want to say this and be done with this conversation: yes i handled that poorly yesterday. i was genuinely overwhelmed because rev was streaming the whole time this was happening last night (and his stream was about something else entirely) and people kept getting in his chat and accusing him of being anti censorship and if he was going to address “the controversy” and it was making me stressed because i was causing him unneeded stress. i definitely don’t want to drag him into anything ever again. and so i definitely got defensive and instead of just being more clear when some people asked valid questions, i was upset that i felt people were accusing me of some things i don’t actually believe, and him too. i do realize that wasn’t everyone’s intentions though, and im sorry for assuming. i also want to apologize to katie, i am sorry, i very well could have misread things in the moment on your second reply and jumped the gun on you by blocking you, and some others as well. my responses were petty and not kind or loving so i am sorry for that. i am anti-censorship. i did end up clarifying this yesterday but i know some people want further clarification. i mentioned the prostitution laws because i do find it ironic that it’s illegal to pay a prostitute to sleep with you, but if you were to film it and call her an “actress” and pay for that, it’s legal. but that wasn’t me saying that i think censorship is the solution or that all porn should be illegal. i do think porn, specifically involving irl people, can be really predatory and exploitative, and while i do find drawn porn “sinful” i dont view it in the exact same way, this is what i was referring to about things not always being so “black and white” to me. but i am a Christian, so yes, i do believe porn is sinful. and for more clarification, i have always been under the impression that loli was not inherently sexual, its a petite fictional bodytype, but i was referring to lolicon specifically in an nsfw/porn context, so maybe there was some confusion there for some people. when i said lolicon (porn) or ANY porn for that matter is “bad”, i am speaking about it from a Christian perspective, because it is a Christian belief that all porn is bad. but that IS NOT a call for censorship or harassment over these things, people have a right to choose these things for themselves, i want to make that clear. i said it before many times and i will say it again, it isn’t CSEM and im not calling anyone a p*do over this. and this doesn’t mean i am trying to hate on you, i don’t look at you as less than, im certainly not perfect (as you have surely seen). and if you aren’t a Christian i honestly don’t expect you to agree with me anyways. we can agree to disagree if you don’t like my position of porn being sinful, but my position on it is firm. some people made some claims about “would you want me jailed for watching porn” etc and my honest answer is no, of course i wouldn’t. if im also honest, i do not personally see how we could even ban porn in the first place, it certainly feels like a pandora’s box that cannot be closed once it has been opened, and i would honestly worry about the type of government that would be able to do these things and where else it could lead to as well… but i also want to be honest and say that i am not a scholar or lawmaker, i dont have all the answers to everything and sometimes i genuinely see multiple sides to something and its hard for me to give black and white, crystal clear answers. especially on twitter.

@shyojo @ReadAFairytale @darlingstrawbie biblehub.com/q/how_to_recon… That passage from Deuteronomy is no longer applicable due to the New Covenant; it was a reflection of the theocratic society of ancient Israel which followed the Old Covenant laws. Christians can guide and persuade others, but should not use coercion.

@CrimsonFireStrm @ReadAFairytale @darlingstrawbie based on the comment I guess it's something in openbible.info/topics/punishm… but i got too much of a migranie to go through that now

@OgCrimson8 It is unfortunate, since I know plenty of Christians who are anti-censorship. You can personally dislike something but still recognize others can consume it. Christians aren't required to force others to be like them; in fact that is discouraged.

Unfortunately, this Rev thing has caused lolicons to start hating Christians because, unfortunately, people will let one person influence how they see an entire group of people, and it's extremely depressing to see.

@ReadAFairytale @shyojo @darlingstrawbie You can choose to abstain from porn yourself; you can't however force others to do so. Christians are only required to apply their beliefs to themselves; you don't have to be pro-censorship to be a Christian.

If you wanted to press me on a bible verse for private property desecration and destruction. The only place is idols. Anyone who owns an idol has it confiscated, destroyed, and gets the death penalty. Pornograohy fits this. It is an object that has, as its only purpose, an imoral end. Which people perform corrupt forms of veneration toward (masturbation). But im fine banning it for purely natural law reasons.

@Hogbeast89 @SPostingSpeeds @JesterGreer Porn is always the first target because it's the easiest. Then the government moves in to censor more stuff they find problematic, until eventually everything is censored, including religion. You don't have to like it, but if you like free speech you have to tolerate it.

@SPostingSpeeds @JesterGreer Oh no! Not my industry tied to exploitation of children and women! Oh how will I be able to masturbate like a degenerate fuckwit if its banned?! The HORROR!!!

Saying porn is bad is not pro-censorship. Fucking retards.

@kaiser_oof9 Perfection

hm

@thespyfromtf21 @H1BeesNuts I looked it up, it's called "Secret Empire".

@thespyfromtf21 @H1BeesNuts I don't read American comics but I do remember hearing of a run where Cap became a member of Hydra, so the "Cap becomes a Nazi" thing already happened. Of course modern Marvel will never portray Communism in the same way.

I feel like Rev and Strawb are slowly slipping towards becoming just like Jon Del Arroz and John F. Trent.

@M3guuuu @MeguminHourly Volume 12: The Knight's Lullaby, yes.

@MeguminHourly Isn't this the plot of an arc?

Artist: hirotonfa Image ID: 9330323 Source: danbooru #megumin #めぐみん #このすば

@H1BeesNuts Good news, he is still anti-censorship and clarified as such in a recent post. He does say he won't engage with the explicit aspects *himself* as much due to his beliefs, which is perfectly fair. A good example of you can be a Christian and still respect other's autonomy.

@Rev_says_desu Thank you for clarifying this.

Since apparently this has to be said, my stance on censorship has not changed. No, liking loli does not make you a pedophile. No, that and other taboo fictional content should not be censored. No, you should not be harassed over fictional content even if its “weird” or “degenerate”. Yes, you should be allowed to make your own choices with the fictional content you consume. I have been very open about coming back to Christ about a year ago and I don’t want to be engaging in these subjects, specifically in covering the more explicit aspects of it, in the same manner as I used to. This is what I am comfortable with. I hope people can respect that boundary. However, it does not mean my stances have changed in a general sense. People have the right to choose what fictional content they consume personally and shouldn’t be harassed for it or certain artwork subject to censorship because of its nature. I have said nothing to the contrary. Things could have been worded more clearly from Strawb, this entire conversation seemed to stress her out a lot and she admitted to not handling it the best way, but comparing me or her to “antis” without even waiting for an explanation is jumping the gun. We have been defending people censored and harassed over these topics for years at the cost of harassment, threats, and slander directed towards us but we still don’t regret doing it. My core audience knows how I feel about all of this but I hope this clarifies some things. Thanks.

@Japanesechetnik @Keniisu Well obviously I'm not going to stop *you* since you are not performing the action and just said words. I will attempt to stop the person that is doing the action on your behalf though as soon as they begin committing violence.

@CrimsonFireStrm @Keniisu But I'm just saying remember ??? I did not do any action myself but someone on my behalf

Stumbled upon one of the worst takes on Free Speech ever today.

@Japanesechetnik @Keniisu Can you not read? I said if you "say" something you're fine and I won't do anything. But I will stop you if you actually perform the action you were talking about. That's not violation of freedom of speech because I still let you say what you wanted.

@CrimsonFireStrm @Keniisu Who says that you have the """right"" to stop me ??? You are violating my free speech remember??? Because what I say requires action and yes I will publicly endorse it if someone does it on my behalf but remember I didn't do it myself

@Japanesechetnik @Keniisu The limit is the moment you actually *do* something to someone. If you simply say something, I'll just think you're being insane and keep my distance. If you actually go and attack someone, it has transitioned from "speech" to "action" and then I have the right to stop you.

@CrimsonFireStrm @Keniisu Where is the limit set between a call to action and just a call ???

@Japanesechetnik @Keniisu I certainly don't agree with what you said there, but you still have the right to express it and I'll defend that. As long as you aren't *actually* going out and doing those things or forcing it on others.

@CrimsonFireStrm @Keniisu So would you find offensive if I say that sexual deviants shoot get hanged publicly along with alcoholics drug addicts smoking addicts and dealers together and advocate for it ???

@H1BeesNuts For Rev it'd be especially devastating because he was one of the biggest pro-loli/anti-censorship voices in the anime community. It is why he had garnered such a strong fanbase. Rev becoming an anti would be like if Captain America became a Communist or Nazi.

@CrimsonFireStrm I'm hoping he doesn't go full JDA/JFT. We don't need another GoonerGate.

@Japanesechetnik @Keniisu I care about citizens having the right to speak freely and not be put behind bars for making content that makes people feel "uncomfortable", regardless of where it is. The UK is just one of the worst offenders, but it's certainly being pushed by politicians in the US too.

@CrimsonFireStrm @Keniisu Do you actually care about Europe and the UK or are you just a hypocrite who uses whataboutism ??

@PraxLemon @MentisWave @Templarpilled Funny how they call video games brainrot but if you actually gave them any decently challenging game many boomers would give up in frustration and say it's too hard for them, since they already have a difficult time figuring out modern tech.

@MentisWave @Templarpilled At least you do shit in video games. Even the biggest slop video games require some level of input, which is more than TV does

People who still attack video games in 2026 are out of touch. Millions of kids and adults are hooked on brain-melting short-form content that slowly sucks the soul out of them until only a shell of a sentient being remains. Anything a boomer has to say about video games pales in comparison to the actual effects slop has on the average person. Ironically, boomers themselves are among those most affected by the slop in question.