
Debo.dev
310 posts

Debo.dev
@Defoeryan
🧑🏽🎨 I code & Design 👩🏽💻 🇩🇲Born & Raised ✝️ Christian
Bergabung Nisan 2014
219 Mengikuti35 Pengikut

@TheGenuineHeart As a Dominican, Guadeloupe has contributed A LOT to Bouyon! You guys deserve to claim it as part of your culture🙏🏽😌
English

@thegoalpatrol_ Love, you sound like your Prime Minister. Trinidad's carnival is lovely.. it wasn't born there though..
English

Can't wait for the day we remove ourselves from these people 🥱 All y'all do is steal culture from Trinidad and then act like it's not from Trinidad weird ass
Aziza Lake 🇦🇬@azizalake
This is why I'm not a fan of saying Snackidad is the birthplace of Carnival. Carnival in different islands evolved from celebrations by our ancestors in the 1700s/1800s.
English

@Defoeryan @jabari53 Thissss! Wimatch was so good in the beginning. But as usual, people start showing they ass (no pun intended 🤣)
English

@kyleburndley We pronounce it the same way as Trinidad in Dominica but I'm not sure if it's spelt the same. Pomme citerre! (I have no stocks in any patois dictionary)
English

wait until you find out what we call it😭
𝓜𝓪𝓻🇯🇲@Marskull_
June Plum is called Golden Apple in St Lucia??
English

@nia_lee7 @WavyTycoon Carnival started in the French Caribbean islands (i.e Dominica etc) it was then brought over to Trinidad from there..
English

@Pedro_Torrijos @de_lagunez @jupixweb Just letting you know, as a third party independent observer, that you won this one. Mr. Torrijos
English

@de_lagunez @jupixweb El debate es interesante y nos llevaría al Primer Motor aristotélico, pero no equilibra el hecho de que un pájaro no necesita una consciencia externa que le *ordene* que vuele.
Español

La gente que sabe *de verdad* de inteligencia artificial lleva diciendo esto desde bastante antes de que los LLMs fuesen populares.
De hecho, la gente que sabe *de verdad* de inteligencia artificial afirma que aún faltan entre 50 y 100 años para que cualquier sistema artificial llegue al nivel de inteligencia de un perro.
Otra cosa es que simule que es inteligente o que sus capacidades sean sobresalientes, pero eso no es inteligencia.
ℏεsam@Hesamation
Google DeepMind researcher argues that LLMs can never be conscious, not in 10 years or 100 years. "Expecting an algorithmic description to instantiate the quality it maps is like expecting the mathematical formula of gravity to physically exert weight."
Español

@javilopen I do it because I am still classified as "new grad", "junior". My skills are not yet at the level where I am valued as an AI engineer
English
Debo.dev me-retweet

@bleubleuge @sensiblehuman96 Correction... You've never been aware** of so much propaganda. It used to be that propaganda was unopposed so you were unaware of the propaganda in your bubble. The only difference today is that you can actually see it for what it is
English

@sensiblehuman96 I have never seen so much propaganda before, from both sides. Fuck this post-modern, post-truth world. We have access to more knowledge and real-time data than any of our ancestors did, but it’s all shit, untrustworthy and flooded with intelligence agency bots.
English


@RaisingRealMen_ @jack @blocks Love love love this!!!!! I had the same idea but you've conceptualized it perfectly!!! "Tax the rich" is a severely dumbed down distraction! This. This is the fair tax reform that we NEED
English

Here’s a policy idea nobody is talking about that could actually work:
Tie corporate tax rates directly to W-2 headcount relative to gross revenue — benchmarked by industry.
Every business already files a tax return declaring its industry code and revenue. The IRS already has W-2 data. The infrastructure exists today.
The formula is simple in concept:
— Fall below your industry’s human labor benchmark and your tax rate rises
— Fall catastrophically below it and you hit a punitive rate that makes extreme automation economically painful
— Stay above the benchmark and you pay standard rates
W-2 employees only. Not contractors. Not gig workers. Not outsourced staffing agencies.
This forces businesses to maintain genuine skin in the social contract — payroll taxes, benefits, real employment — not paper headcount through third parties.
The beauty of this approach:
✦ No new regulatory agency needed
✦ Uses existing IRS infrastructure
✦ Clean audit trail — W-2 fraud is straightforward tax evasion
✦ Generates federal revenue that funds displaced worker retraining
✦ Doesn’t ban automation — it makes automation pay for its own consequences
This is essentially a Pigouvian tax on automation externalities. The same logic as carbon taxes. Companies currently capture all the efficiency gains from replacing workers while society absorbs all the costs — unemployment, retraining, community collapse, and national security vulnerabilities from over-automated critical infrastructure.
Your tax rate should reflect how much of the social contract you’re actually honoring.
A company generating $10B in revenue with 200 employees is free-riding on roads, courts, national defense, and an educated workforce — all funded by the taxpayers whose jobs they eliminated.
It’s time that free ride had a price.
English

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company.
####
today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone.
first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay.
we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly.
i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures.
a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers.
we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold.
to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward.
to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow.
jack
English









