AugustinePatron

225 posts

AugustinePatron

AugustinePatron

@Disciple_Aug

Convert 🇻🇦 | Traditionalist | Conservative | Patriot 🇺🇲

Bergabung Eylül 2025
59 Mengikuti9 Pengikut
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
@biker_poet Then why don’t you call out your brethren for this bad behavior?
English
5
0
13
510
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
We use scripture against Roman Catholics. They use ad hominem attack and harassment. We’re not the same.
English
109
19
393
9.5K
Sola Requiem
Sola Requiem@Sola_Requiem·
My Chinese Byzlarp roommate does this to me when I cook him in theology. It hurts everytime!
Nikhil@cooked_memer

English
3
1
52
1.3K
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@Sola_Requiem I see some people saying they dont like the Luminous mysteries but I personally really enjoy them
English
0
0
0
14
Sola Requiem
Sola Requiem@Sola_Requiem·
Guide for the mysteries of the most holy rosary.
Sola Requiem tweet media
English
3
7
38
1K
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@farmingandJesus imagine being so full of pride and anger that you're angry at someone for meditating on aspects of Jesus' life and praying for intercession 💀 what a retarded demon this creature is.
English
0
0
1
8
Reformed 🧂
Reformed 🧂@ProfessorBigz·
@Disciple_Aug @Mufas001 @farmingandJesus So your argument is the pop used authority and you think that is evidence for the absurd claims the papacy makes for itself, and you are wondering why 'you aren't smart' is being directed your way.
English
1
0
0
7
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
Peter was married and he wasn’t the first pope.
English
142
113
1.7K
115.1K
AugustinePatron me-retweet
Templarpilled
Templarpilled@Templarpilled·
ZXX
5
144
2.3K
26.2K
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@ProfessorBigz @Mufas001 @farmingandJesus So your argument when you're asked to present your actual evidence is "you arent smart"? I gave you examples of the pope using authority and you said "these are lies of Rome". That's not an argument, thats an assertion. You presented zero historical or objective evidence 😂
English
1
0
0
8
Reformed 🧂
Reformed 🧂@ProfessorBigz·
I can’t help it if you aren’t bright enough to follow along. Things that disprove your position, like the historical record and the scholars that handle it honestly and objectively, aren’t fallacies bud. You have yet to even remotely approach an actual rebuttal. Ad hominem is a fallacy and it’s the only thing you have presented, and you can’t even do that well.
English
1
0
0
6
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Charlie Kirk’s name is still trending everyday on X. This case has been kept alive, not by the powerful “friends” he made in politics, but by the many people all around the world that he never met; people who have dedicated their personal time to research and to share what they know—the many of us who are now united in our sense that Charlie was betrayed and that finding out why and by whom matters deeply. Charlie would be proud. Thank you to everyone who is fighting for truth. It does matter.
English
2.3K
4.4K
35.9K
783K
AugustinePatron me-retweet
Live Action
Live Action@LiveAction·
Baby saved 🙌
English
31
453
10.2K
183.8K
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@ProfessorBigz @Mufas001 @farmingandJesus nowhere in your babbling did you make an argument. your whole crash out is "trust me bro." Also the "no honest Roman historian" is a fallacy. low iq attempt and just angry sperging.
English
1
0
0
15
Reformed 🧂
Reformed 🧂@ProfessorBigz·
@Mufas001 @Disciple_Aug @farmingandJesus *by sources, this guy means the nonsense Rome tells him to believe. That’s not how this works. Even honest Romanist historians and scholars admit that’s the case, they just gaslight themselves into thinking it’s ok, because Rome tells them so.
English
1
0
0
18
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@RealCandaceO The proof and evidence that the state has. You have zero proof or evidence beyond "anonymous sources" or feelings or dreams. That's not how claims work, cupcake. Your entire strategy is to present stuff that "seems odd" asserting things is not proof.
English
2
0
7
2.1K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Do not lecture me. You intentionally misrepresented the report and got community-noted. Sort of like you intentionally misrepresented the contents of the Epstein binder back when you were playing the part of a Bondi-girl. There is not a shred of proof that Tyler Robinson’s weapon was even fired on that day. The ATF did NOT hand over any analysis or data to the defense, despite your claim to the contrary, and yet despite this—you wrongly convict Tyler when you describe it as the “gun used to kill Charlie Kirk”. Try “a gun found on the day that Charlie Kirk was killed which not even the bomb dogs could detect and which had a total of six sets of fingerprints on it. Worth noting the FBI will not allow the defense to examine those alternative fingerprints for some reason”. What proof do you have that that was the gun used to kill Charlie Kirk? Or that the weapon was fired at all?
Liz Wheeler@Liz_Wheeler

It’s very important to note what tactic @RealCandaceO is using here, and why. She is deliberately misrepresenting my words, and for a reason. This is exactly what I posted: “The bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk’s body during autopsy matches a .30 caliber class bullet. The .30 caliber bullet matches the .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie Kirk. This per the ATF ballistics analysis. AND before anyone says “the ATF fabricated this”— This ATF report was filed by THE DEFENSE. Tyler Robinson’s lawyers aren’t denying this, they ADMITTED it by filing this report to the court themselves.” Let’s be very clear: the ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie. Which is what my original post was about. Candace claims my second sentence is claiming that the ballistics of the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy match the ballistics from the bullet that law enforcement test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. But that’s obviously NOT how anyone would interpret my words in the context of the entire post. (I also did an entire episode last week breaking down the “inconclusive” report and what it means). Which is why Candace selectively cherry-picked that sentence without the context to trick people into thinking I said something I didn’t. It’s the same tactic Media Matters uses to try to cancel conservatives. You’re familiar with it. The cherry-picked out-of-context quote that they portray to mean something entirely different. The only difference between Candace and Media Matters is Media Matters lies to trick advertisers to pull ad campaigns from their targets, while Candace is willfully twisting my words in order to distract YOU from the reality of the ATF report and how it devastates the entire house of cards Candace built by claiming Charlie couldn’t possibly have been killed by a bullet fired from a .30-06 rifle. But make no mistake, you SHOULD look at exactly what Candace doesn’t want you to see: The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of bullet fired by the kind of .30-06 rifle like Tyler Robinson’s rifle. And the DEFENSE filed this ATF report, which means Tyler Robinson’s attorneys aren’t denying this fact. Again, people are smart enough to recognize the nuance of the ATF report that finds that the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy is CONSISTENT with the kind of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used, while the “inconsistent” result refers to the inability of the analysts to positively identity or exclude specific ballistics markings on the damaged fragment with a bullet they test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle.

English
1K
2K
15.5K
698K
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@RealCandaceO Candunce is now a ballistic expert! 😯is there no wikipedia page she won't become an expert in??
English
0
0
0
74
Sola Requiem
Sola Requiem@Sola_Requiem·
@Disciple_Aug Lol. I had them in my apartment before and they made sure to bring an elder and “former Catholic” to try and talk sense into me. It's safe to say they didn't come back. 🤣
English
2
0
1
150
Sola Requiem
Sola Requiem@Sola_Requiem·
I’m bored and need a new toy to play with. Should I invite Mormon missionaries to my apartment again and have some fun with them?
English
30
0
14
3K
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@RealCandaceO Now shes an expert in legal proceedings! 😂🫵🏻 Dang, college of wikipedia comes in handy. Did you use your special Sumerian technology to figure this out or did it come to you in a dream?
English
0
0
3
1.1K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
It is clear to me that this is the prosecution’s strategy. Remember, Erika has direct and consistent communication with Kash Patel and the President. If she actually wanted a speedy trial, she could call them both and ask them to hand over the data that the defense is requesting pertaining to their September reports, which they plan to rely upon for the evidentiary hearing. She doesn’t want to do that. What she actually wants is the ability to blame the FBI and ATF for the delays while insisting that she, as the victim, wants the trial to move quickly as though they aren’t moving as one organ. The defense said today that they haven’t even SEEN the gun or accessed Tyler Robinson’s text messages. That is by design. They want a probable cause hearing that will be based on hearsay so they can delude the public via an effective show trial into thinking they have mountains of evidence. This is my opinion after reading the filings and listening to the arguments.
English
928
1.6K
12.9K
422K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
A lot of people are wondering why/how Erika Kirk has a “right” to a speedy trial. Yes, constitutionally that right is guaranteed to defendants however Erika is listed as the Victim of this case, and Utah has its own set of state victims’ rights. Erika filed a motion for a speedy trial under state laws on January 16th.
English
1.3K
990
9.8K
498.3K
Matt
Matt@XanacrustX·
@Disciple_Aug @farmingandJesus And how often did he focus on that? Your priorities are all twisted. The focus is on the gospel.
English
1
0
0
7
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@XanacrustX @farmingandJesus He literally believed in her immaculate conception, perpetual virginity, referred to her as Mother of God, said she was sinless, assumed into Heaven, and quite literally called her the "Highest woman." 🙂 All of this is available in his sermon from 1527. You should read more.
English
1
0
0
17
Matt
Matt@XanacrustX·
@Disciple_Aug @farmingandJesus Do you think Luther venerated Mary how modern Romanists do? How much does he focus on the veneration of Mary in his writings? Do you realize how Mary focused the RCC has moved in the last ~150 years?
English
1
0
0
13
AugustinePatron
AugustinePatron@Disciple_Aug·
@RealCandaceO She's now a legal expert because she read a Twitter article 😂 go track some Egyptian planes, toots.
English
0
0
0
6
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Tyler Robinson's defense is making a perfectly reasonable request to be granted a continuance because the ATF and FBI will not hand over files they have had since September. Erika's lawyers are fighting this continuance—they want the preliminary hearing to go forward. They claim they have enough circumstantial evidence, and they plan to object to some of the discovery requests anyway. Why would they object to the discovery requests? Why would they want the case to go forward without the FBI and ATF having produced the DNA data and chain of custody pertaining the very videos they plan to present at the probably cause hearing? This is outrageous. This case SHOULD NOT GO FORWARD until the defense is given the discovery that Kash Patel is withholding.
English
1.8K
4.8K
29.4K
693.1K
Sola Requiem
Sola Requiem@Sola_Requiem·
The left are in shambles from this.
Sola Requiem tweet media
English
3
0
42
514