氷のWよ、戦え！戦え！

英语里有许多发音和拼写不一致的单词，我就想在英语单词的上面增加一些音标来表示发音，辅助记忆单词。 但是有些单词根据词性不同发音也不一样，有些单词发音又有 strong form 和 week form，要用什么工具来解析单词的词性和上下文，需要用上 NLP 吗？ 目前基本完成的 demo 如下：

@crtclmemetheory @EconBreau The baker is the "means of production" itself. The mind is the key to inventions and productions. Socialists will murder a baker and rob his properties and claim themselves moral superiority. Better to take the wise man's wisedom and distribute it to people who are needed.

Disingenuous. No socialist/communist ever thought the bread would bake itself. What they do actually believe is that you can kill the evil capitalist bakers and seize their means of production - the bakery, ovens, tools, and ingredients - and distribute them to people who are wholly ignorant about baking and using or maintaining the equipment, and who do not and never did and never will care about baking bread or maintaining the equipment and that they will suddenly and magically bake more bread better and cheaper than the evil capitalist bakers did.

Socialism is the theory that if you abolish profit, bread will somehow bake itself out of moral superiority.

@EconBreau Socialism has no moral superiority at all. It robs 100 dollars from A, gives 20 dollars to B, keeps 80 dollars for himself, makes A guilty, and tells B to hate A.

If the world were just and truthful,“Austrian Economics” would have just been called “Economics”.

Well that's just awkward isn't it?

You can have the most talented people in the world. If the environment crushes them with regulations, bureaucracy, and impossible barriers to entry, that talent dies unused. Good seeds need good soil. Economic freedom is that soil.

Every generation thinks they invented caring about the poor. Then they support the same failed policies that kept previous generations poor. As a friend of mine said: “Having a heart for the poor is easy. Having a mind for the poor is the challenge.”

Every government program creates three things: 1. A new problem 2. A constituency that benefits from the problem 3. Bureaucrats whose careers depend on managing—not solving—it Then they ask for more funding.

Bad times create capitalism Capitalism creates good times Good times create socialism Socialism creates bad times

@wonaishenye 你这种理解太肤浅了。就单从选举来说，就有很多功能：选票可以作为得到民众授权的凭证，把看不见的支持变成看得见的证据；选举作为权力和平交接的规则，能促使流程的规范化；选举还能促进竞争，提高效率...等等还有很多。还是要学习更多民主知识，提高认知。

选举投票本质上是一场采用‘排除法’的考试。你并非在选拔最优，而是在剔除最烂。这与其说是‘支持’，不如说是一次精准的避险，是别无选择下的无奈之举。

Libertarians are steadfast in our beliefs. Our position does not change based on who is in office or which crowd is loudest. Government power should be limited, accountable, and restrained at all times.

当一个民族的语言和文字被绑架，那么他们的认知也必然残缺不全；因为大部分认知都是通过信息来构建的，但是如果这些信息是通过文字或者语言经过筛选和阉割的，那么每一个人从开始就已经被限制在一个残缺的没有逻辑的认知深井里。 语言和文字本身没有问题，汉字没有错，词汇没有错，语法也没有错。问题在于国家控制了文字和语言的使用权，它就控制了所有人所看到和知道的，都是这个管理体系，希望你看到和知道的。 这种控制，从教育开始就已经完成。教材里的历史被修改、被删减，重要的段落被拿走，关键的因果被省略，只留下被允许的解释框架。理论并不是不存在，而是被有选择地呈现。学生从一开始接触到的，就不是完整的世界，而是被整理过的阉割版本。 进入社会之后，媒体和公共平台继续完成同样的工作。刊发什么、不刊发什么，放大什么、压下什么，都有明确边界。一旦文字触及不被这个管理体系允许的方向，不是封号，就是消失。不是反驳你，而是让你根本不存在。 这意味着什么？ 意味着你看到的所有信息，本身已经是别人筛选后的结果。你所理解的逻辑、你以为的事实、你接触到的所谓“真相”，全部都是通过被审查、被阉割、被过滤后的文字呈现出来的。不是你判断能力不够，而是支撑你判断的材料从未完整的出现过。 正因为如此，很多深层追问注定无法存在。一旦文字开始指向权力、制度和责任，内容就会被迅速清除。于是，人们只能用谐音、代号、暗示去表达本该直说的事情。语言变得拐弯抹角，表达自然变得支离破碎。 所以人们看到的，所有这些表达都像是是残疾的。不是人不想说清楚，而是文字被人为截断。用残缺不全的文字，只能形成残缺不全的思想。就像拿着一支残缺的枪，不可能打赢一场真正的仗。 一个民族如果长期生活在这样的语言环境里，失去的并不是说话的能力，而是把这个世界看清楚的能力。

Socialists love "the people" in the abstract while controlling actual people in practice.

@Alenjonesyi 难道是复苏的周期来了？

GOV: We have a housing crisis. Prices are too high. ME: I agree. Supply is too low. GOV: So we have a plan. We’re going to subsidize demand. ME: …What does that mean? GOV: We’re going to give people money to buy houses. ME: But there aren't enough houses. GOV: Right. So we’ll help them bid harder. ME: If you have 10 people fighting for 1 house, and you give them all cash... the price just goes up. GOV: Then we’ll give them more cash. ME: That’s not a solution. That’s inflation. GOV: It’s "First Time Homebuyer Assistance." ME: Okay, let’s back up. Why are houses so expensive in the first place? GOV: Because we made them the perfect investment vehicle. ME: How? GOV: First, the 30-year fixed mortgage. ME: That’s standard, right? GOV: Only in America. In other countries, rates float. Here, you can lock in a low rate for three decades. ME: Why would a bank take that risk? If inflation goes up, they lose money. GOV: Banks don’t take the risk. They sell the loan to us. ME: To the government? GOV: To Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We guarantee the liquidity. ME: So the taxpayer subsidizes the risk so I can have cheap leverage? GOV: Correct. ME: And then I get to deduct the interest? GOV: Only on the first $750,000 of debt. ME: That seems... high. GOV: It used to be a million. We trimmed it. ME: But wait. If I rent, can I deduct my rent? GOV: No. ME: If I buy a small business, can I deduct the interest on the loan? GOV: It’s complicated. ME: But if I buy a giant house, I definitely can? GOV: Absolutely. We wrote it into the tax code. ME: So you’re paying me to borrow money to buy a bigger house than I need. GOV: We’re "incentivizing ownership." ME: What happens when I sell? GOV: The Capital Gains Exclusion! ME: How does that work? GOV: If you sell a stock for a $500,000 profit, you pay taxes. ME: Roughly 20%. GOV: If you sell your house for a $500,000 profit? ME: What do I pay? GOV: Zero. ME: Zero tax? GOV: As long as you lived there for two years. ME: So housing is the only asset class where I get subsidized 30-year leverage and tax-free profits? GOV: Pretty sweet deal, right? ME: So you turned shelter into a speculative financial asset. GOV: We call it "Generational Wealth." ME: Okay, so demand is juiced to the moon. Can we at least build more supply to bring prices down? GOV: Oh, absolutely not. ME: Why? GOV: Zoning. ME: I own land. Can I build a duplex? GOV: Illegal. Single-family only. ME: Can I build a granny flat? GOV: Only if you provide two parking spots and pass a shadow study. ME: So you made it illegal to build cheaper housing? GOV: We protect "Neighborhood Character." ME: But you spend billions on roads and utilities for the suburbs. GOV: Infrastructure investment. ME: So you subsidize the expensive sprawl, but ban the cheap density? GOV: Now you’re getting it. ME: This system seems designed to keep prices high. GOV: It is. ME: But you started this conversation by saying we have an "Affordability Crisis." GOV: We do. Prices are too high! ME: So we should lower them? GOV: No! We can’t lower prices. ME: Why not? GOV: Because then the voters lose their "Generational Wealth." ME: So we need high prices for the voters... and low prices for the buyers? GOV: Exactly. ME: That’s a paradox. GOV: It’s politics. ME: So what is your actual plan? GOV: We’re going to give first-time buyers $25,000. ME: Okay. I’m a seller. I list my house for $400,000. GOV: Uh huh. ME: I know every buyer just got a free $25,000 from the government. GOV: Right. ME: What do I do? GOV: You... keep the price the same? ME: I raise the price to $425,000. GOV: You wouldn't. ME: I absolutely would. The buyer can afford it now. GOV: But that just transfers the subsidy from the poor buyer to the rich seller! ME: Econ 101. GOV: We don’t think that will happen. ME: Just like you didn’t think $7,500 EV credits would make Ford raise the price of the F-150 Lightning by exactly $7,500? GOV: That was a coincidence. ME: You are trapping us in a box. GOV: It’s not a box. ME: What is it? GOV: It’s a Single Family Home with a 2.5% mortgage rate that you can never afford to sell. ME: ... GOV: Welcome to the American Dream.

The free market is billions of people voting with their wallets every day. Politicians hate that kind of democracy.

Earning an income isn't a crime. We need to cancel every penny of income tax.

No one is in charge. That's why they're cheap.

Whoever is in charge of TV prices should be put in charge of healthcare, education, and housing prices

@Kenntnis22 应该禁止设立教育部才对

阿富汗塔利班恐怖政权的伪教育部长宣布阿富汗女性永久禁止入学接受教育。