Falcon Defence

پاکستان افغانستان کی جنگ بندی کو مستقل کیا جائے ۔ دنیا کا مستقبل پاکستان ایران اور افغانستان سے وابستہ ہے ۔ ان تینوں ممالک نے اپنے سے بڑی طاقتوں کو شکست سے دو چار کیا ہے ۔

In the border areas of the Tirah Valley connected to Afghanistan, Pakistani security forces are withdrawing and abandoning positions to create space for Lashkar-e-Taiba, ISIS, and so-called local peace committee militias to take control. According to local sources, this retreat is not driven by militant pressure, as attacks lack the scale and intensity to force such a move. Instead, it reflects a calculated policy of enabling proxy groups with safe havens and using them against others, particularly pitting Lashkar-e-Taiba and ISIS against the Pakistani Taliban. This underscores a long-standing and controversial strategy of advancing military objectives by destabilizing the tribal areas and turning them into launching pads of violence in Afghanistan. Consequently, Pakistan aims to establish ISIS strongholds in the Tirah Valley to export terrorism to Afghanistan and Central Asia.

In the border areas of the Tirah Valley connected to Afghanistan, Pakistani security forces are withdrawing and abandoning positions to create space for Lashkar-e-Taiba, ISIS, and so-called local peace committee militias to take control. According to local sources, this retreat is not driven by militant pressure, as attacks lack the scale and intensity to force such a move. Instead, it reflects a calculated policy of enabling proxy groups with safe havens and using them against others, particularly pitting Lashkar-e-Taiba and ISIS against the Pakistani Taliban. This underscores a long-standing and controversial strategy of advancing military objectives by destabilizing the tribal areas and turning them into launching pads of violence in Afghanistan. Consequently, Pakistan aims to establish ISIS strongholds in the Tirah Valley to export terrorism to Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Several important questions: Leaders of some countries live in rented houses, while leaders of others have permanent residences. Which of them would be at greater risk, & which would be better able to ensure their own security? The armies of some countries are skilled in frontline, conventional warfare, while others are experienced in prolonged, exhausting wars of attrition. In the event of an offensive against each other, which side would suffer greater losses? The militaries of some countries possess only a few old helicopters, whereas others have advanced fighter jets, reconnaissance aircraft, radar systems, & air defense systems worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. If the equipment of both sides were targeted, which one would incur greater damage? Some countries have very limited military & logistical reserves, while others maintain large military & strategic stockpiles. If the reserves of both were targeted, which side would suffer more losses? In some countries, there are ongoing investments worth tens of billions of dollars, often with significant foreign involvement, while in others investment is mostly domestic with little foreign participation. If major projects in both were targeted, which country would face greater damage? If in one country there is little visible opposition—yet it has suffered defeats, is complacent, & lacks public trust—while another country is actively organizing & its opposition forces are prepared & ready, then if conflict becomes unavoidable, which country would suffer greater harm?