

FiatHawk - Bitcoin is Hope
18K posts

@FiatHawk
Bitcoin is Hope.






A quantum computer just "broke" Bitcoin. Except it didn't. Not even close. Google Quantum AI published a paper showing they've cut the theoretical ECDSA attack down to 1,200 logical qubits. They didn't publish the circuits. They didn't run the attack. They published a zero-knowledge proof that their math works, then cited national security. Here's where we actually are. Entangled logical qubits achieved so far: 96 Coherence time: 1-2 seconds Time the attack requires: days Physical qubits needed: 500,000 Largest quantum computer today: 1,200 noisy, non-error-corrected qubits That's a 100,000x coherence gap. It's not a software problem. It's a fundamental engineering problem that nobody has solved. But here's what most people miss. Bitcoin developers aren't waiting for a crisis. They're already shipping. SHRIMPS: post-quantum signatures 3x smaller than NIST standards, built for Bitcoin's block space constraints. BIP-360: a quantum-resistant output type already live on testnet, with BTQ Technologies running transactions through it. The full upgrade could take 7 years. That's why the work started now. The protocol will be ready before the computers are.







FINANCE: "I don't like that we're going to support stablecoins but our customers want them," says @jack — as @Blocks reluctantly joins @Stripe and @PayPal in adding stablecoin support despite Dorsey's long-held belief that $BTC is the internet's native money.
















everyone knows there are minuscule, scattered individual efforts Matt. what matters is the consensus of the most influential devs, as is always the case with any upgrade, again, as you know. the last two major upgrades to Bitcoin took 7-8 years from first proposal to meaningful adoption on chain. the only named BIP pertaining to quantum is BIP360 and even that has not been co-signed by any major dev. and BIP360 is only a first of many, many steps that need to be made. as you know, the consensus among the most influential devs is that quantum is - not a real concern - only driven by investors - driven by hype - driven by people who are long quantum stocks or whatever these same objections were raised in 2021 when taproot was being added (as it is not quantum resistant) and dismissed then. you were part of those discussions. the risk has become far more urgent since. until Bitcoin does something like Ethereum and makes quantum an explicit strategic priority, people will continue to desert it. you may not care about what capital thinks, but I can assure you, everyone else in Bitcoin does. coindesk.com/tech/2026/01/2…






Sumitomo Mitsui is prepared to increase its Japanese govt bond portfolio to as much as double the current JPY10.6 trn, global markets head Arihiro Nagata said in an interview: BBG Now why on earth would you tell the world you are about to buy huge amounts of something?