Gary

1.6K posts

Gary

Gary

@Garygra

New Jersey, USA Bergabung Nisan 2009
493 Mengikuti60 Pengikut
Gary me-retweet
Perma Banned ထ🔨
Perma Banned ထ🔨@GiveMeBanHammer·
Like I said in a previous post on the topic of ID/Age Verification - I started digging into the topic quite a bit, especially after that Meta lobbying exposed news dropped. What I have (and more of others) found is something that is so stupid, but also makes a whole lot of sense...in fact imo its the perfect piece of the puzzle. I will lay out my digging through a series of events: 1. Advertisers (ie Corporations with products or services to sell), contract with big Social media platforms, paying boatloads of money for adspace. The logic is that even if 10% of the tens of millions of users buy into their ads, its worth the investment. 2. The onset of botting, has led to ads being viewers by more bots than they do humans. No matter how many bots watch your ads, they never need your products or services. So they will never give advertisers' money and business. 3. This essentially means that, Advertisers are proverbially throwing money into the drain. Paying the price with practically no ROI. Many reports indicate that this botting problem resulted in multi-billion dollar wastage on ad spending. 4. Advertisers have started grilling social media companies, especially Meta which was one of the biggest sources of the issue. This resulted in many advertisers basically threatening to pull ad money until the botting situation is controlled. 5. The botting situation became even WORSE around 2023-2025 with the Ai-Bros and Ai Companies hard pushing Ai development. The past anti-bot systems and measures lose effectiveness as Ai makes bots more sophisticated. 6. Then late 2025/2026, you can see the SNAP. The nuclear solution - Age/ID verification being pushed or implemented across multiple countries at around the same timing (within months). 7. Then now all the news about Socmed and big tech corps lobbying politicians and governments for mass ID/Age Verification on an OS/Appstore level. 8. Why? Since you pick your poison to "age verify"...a selfie, submit your ID, or Ping your credit card. Sure your age will be "verified", but it also comes with the useful byproduct of confirming you are HUMAN. So as a takeaway, what does this mean? Well to me at least, this quite neatly explains why BOTH Governments and large Corporations have collaborated and colluded to push for ID Verification at an alarming pace Globally. In the end, it really was about money. It also means quite simply in my opinion - these Corporations and Governments, NEVER really cared about "the children". "Think of the Children" imo, has always been, and will continue to be the convenient excuse for these corporations and politicians to implement this privacy-invasive system. Because if only PROVEN humans can use social media, or other similar sites/services - Advertisers will be mollified and continue to throw money at these Big Tech corporations for continued ad space. This ALSO means - that the so-called parents and people like the Riceman who run defence of ID Verification, are either very stupid, or complicit in this. Either way, the only winners are the Advertisers, the Big Tech Corpos, and the Politicians. We all however, lose.
Perma Banned ထ🔨 tweet mediaPerma Banned ထ🔨 tweet mediaPerma Banned ထ🔨 tweet mediaPerma Banned ထ🔨 tweet media
English
108
1.1K
3.2K
91.5K
Gary me-retweet
Toby 🛩️
Toby 🛩️@303SnowWolf·
The Linux community of 20 years ago would've taken one look at AB 1043 and pushed an update that limited the network speed of every machine in California to 1 kbps until it was repealed.
Ubuntu@ubuntu

Over the past couple of days, there has been a lot of commentary about #Ubuntu and how it'll respond to California's new Digital Age Assurance Act (AB 1043). Read our response on Discourse: discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntus-resp…

English
120
1.8K
20.7K
609.7K
Gary me-retweet
sudox
sudox@kmcnam1·
sudox tweet media
ZXX
59
7.5K
81.8K
768.1K
Gary me-retweet
DuckDuckGo
DuckDuckGo@DuckDuckGo·
The public vote on AI is officially live. Where do you stand? Go to VoteYesOrNoAI.com
DuckDuckGo tweet media
English
236
547
4.1K
1.4M
Gary me-retweet
Ewan Morrison
Ewan Morrison@MrEwanMorrison·
The belief in AGI (Human Level Intelligence) is quasi-religious. It's surfaced 3 times in 70 years of AI research. 2 different AI systems were promised as pathways to AGI in the 60s & 80s. LLMs are the 3rd failed path. "the belief that AGI is coming soon is faith, not evidence"
Haider.@haider1

Journalist Karen Hao says AGI is not scientifically grounded; it's a quasi-religious movement in Silicon Valley Since we still don't agree on what human intelligence is, companies like OpenAI can shape the definition of AI to suit their needs "the belief that AGI is coming soon is faith, not evidence"

English
65
387
2K
60.1K
Gary me-retweet
awlivv
awlivv@awlivv69·
rt if you fucking hate AI
English
340
113.9K
189.9K
3.9M
Gary me-retweet
Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸
HOLY FUCK WILL YOU PEOPLE STOP. Large language models are not conscious and can never be conscious. They are not intelligent—they are TOKEN PREDICTORS. If you think chatbots should be able to vote in elections, you are a hopeless smooth-brained moron.
Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸 tweet media
Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸@jimstewartson

The same group of soulless oligarchs that got people addicted to hate speech by labeling radicalization apps “social media” are getting people addicted to psychosis generators by calling chatbots “artificial intelligence.”

English
378
904
5.6K
158.9K
Gary me-retweet
Mónica Calles Miramontes
Mónica Calles Miramontes@moni_calles·
Soy Observadora Electoral, por lo que tengo derecho no solo a estar presente en computos, sino a solicitar información. Mi experiencia en la Junta Distrital 17 @INECDMX ha sido de total OPACIDAD: 1. No permitieron que a la pantalla de resultados se le tomaran fotografías, así que la mantuvieron apagada durante TODO el computo distrital. 2. No me han querido proporcionar la versión estenografica de la sesión del Consejo y eliminaron de internet la posibilidad de verlas. No es casual. Un consejero distrital renunció en la mesa de consejo protestando con valentía ante el fraude que se está cometiendo y realizó IMPORTANTES denuncias y señalamientos. 3. Me han negado la posibilidad de ver actas, aunque alegan que es algo general. ¡Esto es GRAVÍSIMO! Las personas observadores o Candidaturas NO tenemos acceso físico o digital a las actas de resultados de casilla, incluso a ninguna, por lo que tuve que solicitar por escrito y me dicen que "será tardado". Con esto se obstruye a los candidatos la posibilidad de impugnar los cómputos (que ahí ya finalizaron). @INEMexico @DaniaRavel @CZavalaP @MartinFazMora @JaimeRiveraV @RitaBellLpz @Pajaropolitico @lasillarota
Mónica Calles Miramontes tweet media
Español
141
3.4K
5.5K
128.1K
Gary
Gary@Garygra·
@NJTRANSIT_NEC how does rutgers football gets special treatment at New Brunswick station? People were not allowed to board the first two cars of the 6:59 train.
English
0
0
0
41
Gary me-retweet
Pixel Art Journey
Pixel Art Journey@PixelArtJourney·
Taking no credit for this quote but we should stop calling it "ai art" and start calling it computer-rendered artificial pictures (C.R.A.P.)
English
144
21.3K
121.6K
1.4M
Gary me-retweet
Sofia. 👸 ☘️
Sofia. 👸 ☘️@LSofiaDim·
Dice Guadalupe Tadeii que por 1ª vez las y los ciudadanos NO contarán los votos. En otras palabras: “Ya tenemos los resultados, solo faltan las elecciones”.
Español
828
4.5K
11.8K
591K
Gary me-retweet
Tim Walz
Tim Walz@Tim_Walz·
Elon Musk is a terrible president.
English
36.4K
81.3K
734.4K
33.8M
Gary me-retweet
Ed Zitron
Ed Zitron@edzitron·
I'm so sorry I can't stop laughing. OpenAI, the company built on stealing literally the entire internet, is crying because DeepSeek may have trained on the outputs from ChatGPT. They're crying their eyes out. What a bunch of hypocritical little babies. ft.com/content/a0dfed…
Ed Zitron tweet mediaEd Zitron tweet media
English
497
4.4K
33.5K
1.8M
Gary me-retweet
Catherine Rampell
Catherine Rampell@crampell·
I didn’t ask Scott to "do a Nazi salute." I asked Scott to do whatever Elon Musk’s gesture was, since Scott said it was a mere greeting of enthusiasm for the crowd. If that's the case, he should have had no problem enthusiastically greeting our live TV audience that way too
Rich Lowry@RichLowry

Challenging Scott Jennings to do a Nazi salute on air when his whole point is that Elon didn't do a Nazi salute is not the killer rejoinder she thinks it is mediaite.com/a/swsvy via @mediaite

English
3.5K
15.7K
229.4K
8.3M
Gary me-retweet
FuckCars
FuckCars@FuckCarsReddit·
FuckCars tweet media
ZXX
389
26.7K
221.4K
2.9M