Tweet Disematkan
Viktor
347 posts


@AnonLefttwt I prefer socialism to end all bourgeois and reactionary entities and unify the whole of the human species
English


@shitman3561 @AnonLefttwt Why respond to what I'm saying when you can hallucinate about me saying something else and disagree with that? Brilliant!
English

@IntPessoa @AnonLefttwt Oh suddenly the leftcom thinks intellectuals and peasants are proletariat

English

@AnonLefttwt Also, they absolutely do not "have socialism in mind," since they do not see a classless society as a desirable end-goal for their nonsense
English

@AnonLefttwt No, it's nothing like classical social democracy. The latter was, despite its errors and bourgeois elements, a proletarian movement, while the "social democracy" of today is a class-collaborationist ideology laying completely inside the bourgeois political camp
English

@AnonLefttwt Why should that matter when they want that worker to continue being a wage slave?
English

@sidhdbejsu @AnonLefttwt Internationalism is when more than two bourgeois nations unite
English

@IntPessoa @AnonLefttwt “internationalists” when you propose the unity of 1.5 billion people in the second largest continent in the world instead of vague “internationalism” and permanent revolution:
GIF
English

@AnonLefttwt I agree with the sex part, but only with regards to the different tendencies of the communist left (excluding the proto-leftists online) and the few internationalist anarchists that may exist
English

@AnonLefttwt There is nothing of interest for the class and its party in any (pan-) nationalist movement or any state that does not express an exclusive proletarian and internationalist character.
English

@AnonLefttwt Socialists in Africa who fight for anything other than the autonomy and totalitarian rule of the international working class are not worthy of their title and should be regarded as enemies of the class.
(...)
English

@AnonLefttwt Nothing new is being presented: "Marxism-Leninism" was counter-revolutionary yesterday, and it remains so today
English

@fyzika_ @AnonLefttwt No, "social democrat with communism in mind" and vice versa are both describing an anti-communist perspective
English

@IntPessoa @AnonLefttwt Man what are we saying here, communism is liberalism now?
English

@AnonLefttwt I mean being a Trotskyist no longer indicates any qualitative difference with Stalinism
English

@Masaim91 @AnonLefttwt Yes, being conservative, religious and a leftist (even if you called yourself a socialist/anarchist) makes you part of the left-wing of capital. You don't support the proletarian struggle, you just want another management of capital
English

@IntPessoa @AnonLefttwt They meant most leftists as in socialists->Anarchists in the 3rd world are conservatives and religious. Not to say I agree with the statement, but your assertion is also incorrect.
English

@AnonLefttwt How can you seriously believe that, once the human spirit has been set free, and once all artificial divisions between humans and their community and nature has been abolished, that things like linguistic boundaries could survive?
One global community, one language!
English


















