
Nascal
557 posts

Nascal
@Nascal040
DM open 18+ Open trade/commission https://t.co/DG1ClAdML6 https://t.co/GUPx89xeP7 Bluesky: https://t.co/CFfOePKWvz







Now we are witnessing a struggle between true creators and so‑called AI creators. People persistently argue that AI creation is just as complex and requires no less time than genuine art. It’s interesting, then, why there are so many of them now? Why are they actively writing about replacing professions such as musicians, artists, performers, designers, and writers — almost gloating over the potential loss of jobs for other people? After all, many people have spent their entire lives becoming artists, have devoted themselves to music, and this is the very meaning of their lives. Can genuine human creation really be compared to this so‑called creativity? To understand this, I propose considering what creativity is for, in the first place. First and foremost, creativity is our opportunity to share our experience and the depth of our psyche. We express our feelings and emotions not only through speech but also through creating paintings, poetry, architecture, music, etc. This entire process of imagination and creativity is directed towards other living people — to convey our feelings on a deeper level. In a previous post, I already wrote about AI agents that completely remove the author from the creative process. This fundamentally changes the very concept of creativity in the age of AI. I believe we need either a new social network without AI, or full identification and clear labelling of AI‑generated content. #noai #handmade I used the papier‑mache technique and epoxy resin for the crystals, and I also mounted diodes inside for backlighting.








Digital artists, share your first digital art and year vs. now ! 2018 vs. 2025



















