Tweet Disematkan
Open-Root
30.7K posts

Open-Root
@OpenRoot1
Avec Open-Root, votre extension personnalisée en toute liberté! Ne louez plus vos extensions, achetez-les.
Bergabung Kasım 2012
798 Mengikuti868 Pengikut
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet

…et moi je croyais que le lapin était rajouté à l’image en AI🤪
C’est tellement énorme 😱
@
Here we have the Mad King Donald casually discussing WWIII and dead soldiers while standing next to a giant fucking Easter Bunny. Seriously, get me off this ride ...
Français
Open-Root me-retweet
⚡️🌍INFO - Les #superprofits des géants #pétroliers vont en partie dans les paradis fiscaux, révèle une étude de l’Observatoire international de la fiscalité... (Le Monde) lemonde.fr/economie/artic…
Français
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet
🇰🇵 Un réseau très organisé d'ingénieurs nord-coréens noyaute les sociétés du Vieux Continent, notamment dans le domaine de la défense et de l'IA. ➡️ l.lexpress.fr/TUx
✍️ @A_gayte

Français
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet

BILL GATES’ MICROSOFT CAN ERASE YOUR ENTIRE COMPUTER - AND MOST PEOPLE DON’T REALIZE IT UNTIL IT’S TOO LATE
A man is going viral after exposing what millions of Windows users are just now realizing about Bill Gates’ Microsoft.
"I think they should have to go to jail for this."
Windows updates quietly turn on OneDrive without a plain English warning.
Your files don’t get “backed up.”
They get moved.
Your computer becomes a temporary access point.
Microsoft’s servers become the primary copy.
Then the trap snaps shut.
People report:
• Family photos gone
• Work files wiped
• Years of data erased
• Clean desktops with no warning
• A little icon asking: “Where are my files?”
Many thought it was ransomware.
It wasn’t.
Turning OneDrive off can delete everything locally.
Deleting files to “free up space” deletes them everywhere.
The only way out? A buried menu… or a YouTube tutorial.
Nowhere does it clearly say:
“We are transferring your entire computer to our servers.”
Millions clicked “Update” without knowing this was included.
If a company can silently take control of your files and delete them with one wrong click - how is this not malware?
English
Open-Root me-retweet
🚨🔴 35 000 000 de données patients refont surface avec la cyberattaque sur les ARS de 8 régions administratives en France. C'est plus de 130 hôpitaux touchés.
J'en avais bcp parlé avec différentes infos...
Le cybercriminel derrière cette cyberattaque, Marak, a été arrêté par la justice. À l'époque ce dernier me disait ne pas vendre ces données médicales sensibles et que c'était son plus beau "trophée de guerre" cyber...
Quelques mois plus tard, la base de données se retrouve dans les mains d'un autre groupe cybercriminel bien connu Dumpsec et est à la vente...
[...]

Français

RT @siliconcarnesf: Les partis les plus tech en France ?
L'extrême droite et LFI.
Pas LREM. Pas les Républicains.
Les extrêmes ont une gén…
Français
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet

In 2017, the Future of Life Institute made a short film — Slaughterbots — to warn about AI-powered micro-drones.
Palm-sized. Autonomous. Facial recognition. Three grams of shaped explosive — enough to penetrate a skull.
They called it a warning.
The drone they depicted flies itself. Reacts a hundred times faster than a human. The staccato movement is an anti-sniper feature. It finds your face in a crowd and doesn’t stop.
In swarms, they penetrate buildings, cars, trains. Evade bullets. Evade countermeasures.
The film showed a $25 million order buying enough to kill half a city.
That was eight years ago.
Autonomous flight. Facial recognition targeting. Swarm coordination. Micro-explosives. All of it was already in development when the film was made.
Since then, the U.S. military, China, and others have run live swarm tests. The components are cheaper, faster, and more integrated.
The Future of Life Institute made the film to stop it.
Nobody stopped it.
English
Open-Root me-retweet

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side.
Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.”
That is not diplomacy.
That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away.
Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival.
And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist.
The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions.
The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance.
Huang is telling you severance is suicide.
You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence.
America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building.
That pull is not permanent.
The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it.
Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes.
Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation.
China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast.
They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival.
And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling.
Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.”
That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying.
The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it.
That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math.
The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on.
Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes.
And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight.
The danger is not that China outspends the U.S.
The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead.
The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think.
Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose.
Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them.
And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it.
The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric.
It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it.
Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting.
The algorithm does not care about flags.
It scales for whoever shows up with the math.
And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.
English
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet
Open-Root me-retweet













