
There are people around the NBA who have Caleb Wilson ranked higher than Cameron Boozer on their draft boards, per @NBADraftWass
Selective Views
299 posts

@SelectiveViews
Basketball, Music, Movies, Pop Culture, Sports, Politics…it’s all on the table for a selective view.

There are people around the NBA who have Caleb Wilson ranked higher than Cameron Boozer on their draft boards, per @NBADraftWass

JUST IN: The Rockets have an 86% chance to eliminate the Lakers in the first round of the NBA playoffs Lakers essentially have no chance

Nothing less impressive in sports media or any other kind of media than responding to someone's reporting breaking news for millions of people in this fashion. "Oh we all knew." OK! Doesn't help the audience if you didn't have enough to report it, or if you did but chose not to

Can’t understand this @Ryanmurphhoop. More taxes, less money, still aways from home, way worse fans at UCLA, and mick Cronin.



The Lakers are down their top two ball handlers, this was always going to be the move. Irwin misguidedly convinced himself it was going to be Timme so now we have to listen to him whine for the next 3 days. I like Timme but his skill set wasn’t a need.

Sunday thoughts on the NBA



The future doesn’t matter. Timme helps against Houston or Minnesota now. That needs to be the focus.

@UNC_Basketball Who knows where LeBron, Jokic, and Steph would be if it weren’t for Mike Malone




Rob Pelinka having stans is one of the dumber developments of my career. Have some standards, people.



@AnthonyIrwinLA The Lakers just manhandled the Rockets with ease. If they have Luka and AR they are no problem. I doubt the wolves are either. Without those guys it’s a long shot anyways but you need someone to bring the ball up when LeBron needs a rest. You have to have enough guards.





Inside the NBA’s GM meeting this week: How concept #1 could be reshaped, why 22 teams vs. 18 is a debate, and the one idea that got Adam Silver’s attention. New column on @YahooSports on what lottery reform could actually look like: sports.yahoo.com/nba/article/nb…

During the NBA GM meeting this week, one person suggested make the bottom three teams ineligible for the top picks entirely. The league, per multiple sources, found this to be way too extreme. But then another person on the call offered a softer version of the same concept: What if the bottom three teams just had slightly lower odds than the teams ranked four through 10? Not zero. Just a little less. Sources on the call say Adam Silver responded enthusiastically to this idea. Which speaks to the state of lottery reform. The 18 team/8% odds for the top 10 concept is simply still just the concept. The specifics of it will change by the time the league votes on it in late May. And adjustments — like this one — are still in heavy consideration. I think it’s brilliant. Under that structure, with the bottom three teams having slightly worse odds, there is no longer a single point in the standings where losing helps you. Tanking all the way to the bottom hurts you a bit. It’s not quite relegation that you’d see in the Premier League, but it’s the NBA’s own form that would punish being the worst in the league. And much like Premier League teams have entertaining games to prevent relegation, NBA teams would too. Picture two bad teams in late March, both within a game of the bottom three, both desperate to win. That's a win for the fans. Picture the front office of the Wizards doing the calculus on whether to shut down Trae Young and Anthony Davis and realizing that, actually, no, the vets need to go play, because falling in the standings is a real cost now, not a reward. That's a win for the sport. Picture Sacramento intentionally fouling Seth Curry late in a game, and the conversation around it shifting from "nefarious tanking" to "bad coaching." That's a win for the league. More on @YahooSports: