Michael Semrok

27.3K posts

Michael Semrok

Michael Semrok

@SemrokM

Blessed are the Peacemakers for they will be called children of God !

Bergabung Mayıs 2023
382 Mengikuti916 Pengikut
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Martyupnorth®- Unacceptable Fact Checker
Carney is trying to get conservatives to turn on Pierre Poilievre, and boot him as party leader. Then he'll call a snap election. Carney was sent here to finish the job Trudeau started, and he will do just that.
English
187
356
1.7K
19.7K
Michael Semrok me-retweet
J
J@coffeegal1967·
ZXX
0
0
0
15
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Dan Knight
Dan Knight@DanKnightMMA·
Liberal boomers wrecked this country. Crushed housing, jacked taxes, flooded the job market, and turned Canada into a high-tax low-opportunity hellhole for young people. Now they're furious we're leaving in droves and want to fine us hundreds of thousands for emigrating? Straight-up Communist Russia bullshit. Let them own the mess they made.
🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets@AntonioTweets2

Liberals love this 🤦🏻‍♂️

English
139
574
2.3K
66.8K
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸
‼️MAJOR ALERT At the Liberal Party convention in Canada they are proposing LOCKING Canadian workers in Canada by forcing them to pay $500,000 dollars to work in the USA! ....which only the elite can afford. Canada is turning into a leftist PRISON CAMP! .. FAST!
English
999
3.4K
10.5K
434.7K
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM
The most effective response for Albertans is simple: Sign the petition!! Participate in democracy. Show that you care, that you are engaged, and that you are capable of making your own decisions. Because democracy is not passive, it depends on citizens who are willing to step forward and take part. Make your voices heard so Ottawa hears it once and for all!
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM@echipiuk

Less than 24 hours after the close of the proceeding, Justice Leonard issued her stay decision, stating: “To be clear, the Court is not staying the collection of signatures; this decision has no impact whatsoever on the signature collection period or when that period expires... Specifically, the Chief Electoral Officer shall not certify the petition results or make a referral to the Minister of Justice until the Court has ruled on the Applications by ACN and the Blackfoot Nations.” If there is no harm in gathering signatures, what is the harm in verifying them or transmitting the results to the Legislature? In effect, the decision halts the communication of the democratic will of citizens to their elected representatives. How does that strengthen, or even preserve, the integrity of our democratic process? And it doesn’t take into consideration the canvassers, those standing in the cold for hours and engaged their fellow citizens in a lawful democratic exercise, only to be told that their work cannot be formally recognized or conveyed. If participation is permitted, but the outcome cannot be communicated, what exactly is the process meant to achieve and who does that ultimately serve?

English
29
231
614
11.3K
Michael Semrok me-retweet
David Parker
David Parker@david_parker·
Wild, a judge is refusing to let Albertans communicate their desires to their legislature. Democracy is dying in Canada.
English
125
365
1.3K
16.7K
Niels
Niels@Koniq93·
@echipiuk The process is the punishment.
English
1
1
8
232
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM
Less than 24 hours after the close of the proceeding, Justice Leonard issued her stay decision, stating: “To be clear, the Court is not staying the collection of signatures; this decision has no impact whatsoever on the signature collection period or when that period expires... Specifically, the Chief Electoral Officer shall not certify the petition results or make a referral to the Minister of Justice until the Court has ruled on the Applications by ACN and the Blackfoot Nations.” If there is no harm in gathering signatures, what is the harm in verifying them or transmitting the results to the Legislature? In effect, the decision halts the communication of the democratic will of citizens to their elected representatives. How does that strengthen, or even preserve, the integrity of our democratic process? And it doesn’t take into consideration the canvassers, those standing in the cold for hours and engaged their fellow citizens in a lawful democratic exercise, only to be told that their work cannot be formally recognized or conveyed. If participation is permitted, but the outcome cannot be communicated, what exactly is the process meant to achieve and who does that ultimately serve?
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM tweet mediaEva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM tweet media
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM@echipiuk

This week, we will be in Court on a challenge brought by several First Nations in relation to the independence petition. Our position is straightforward: the matter is non-justiciable, premature, and fundamentally political, not legal. It is not a matter for the Court and should be dismissed outright. It is unfortunate that emotion and misinformation have become part of this campaign, which has caused division and confusion. At this stage of the process, a private Albertan has collected signatures from fellow citizens and has already communicated that outcome to elected representatives. Did anything life-shattering or legally consequential occur? No. So we already know the answer to this week of court challenges: nothing changes legally, because nothing has happened beyond citizens communicating with each other and with their elected officials. This is civic engagement. It is a core feature of a functioning democracy and it should be encouraged, not discouraged and obstructed. Importantly, no one requires permission to speak with fellow citizens or to convey collective views to elected officials. Mr. Mitch Sylvestre chose to use the framework set out in the Citizen Initiative Act, legislation designed to structure and facilitate precisely this kind of participation, with oversight by Elections Alberta. Because that statutory framework exists, it opens the door to legal challenges directed at both the legislation and the actions of Elections Alberta. That is how we arrived here. But at its core, this case reflects something much broader: organized interests seeking to challenge administrative decisions that are intended to enable citizen participation, not restrict it. And when lawful civic engagement is met with attempts to control or suppress it, the result should not be surprising. The more participation is constrained, the more people will push back and seek other avenues to be heard. So we must ask ourselves: Do we want a system that encourages citizens to engage or one that discourages them from participating? And if participation is discouraged, who actually benefits?

English
128
365
1K
59.6K
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Morgan Ariel
Morgan Ariel@itsmorganariel·
MAGA is dead. Do not sink to the bottom of the ocean with this ship.
Morgan Ariel tweet media
English
201
289
2.5K
24.8K
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🚨🇮🇷🇶🇦 Al Jazeera just released the first footage of Iranian missiles hitting Ras Laffan, Qatar's gas hub and one of the most critical energy facilities on the planet. This is the facility that supplies LNG to Europe, Asia and beyond.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israel is apparently already preparing for talks to fail and things to escalate again. Reports say the army is getting ready in case Washington–Tehran negotiations collapse, with plans in place to resume strikes on Iran. Message is pretty direct, if no real deal comes out of the talks, attacks are back on the table. Source: RN Intel

English
112
767
2.9K
1.1M
Michael Semrok me-retweet
Ron Paul
Ron Paul@RonPaul·
President Trump has shown a curious characteristic of turning on those who want to hold him to account. Right at the beginning, we had the falling out with Elon Musk over the Big Beautiful Bill. Then, to Trump voters who wanted accountability on the Epstein Files, the president wrote: "I don't want their support anymore." And now the president has attacked his biggest and most influential backers: Alex Jones, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens. Why is the president burning so many important bridges? Watch @RonPaul & @ChrisRossini below:
Ron Paul@RonPaul

Trump Torches MAGA -- Blasts His Biggest (Now Former) Supporters x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

English
670
1.8K
10.1K
468.8K