Snarky Sticky

She had a bad day and I am loving it for her. They just came out looking foolish. Asking for the judge to handle their discovery dispute because they refused Proctor’s extension. The Judge says ok I’ll help you out. And they were like just kidding. A few weeks is better! And cherry on top get the ethics book thrown at them! 🤣

@SnarkySticky I thought the same thing… the lawyer kept pressing the issues cuz he doesn’t wanna hear it from karen

Judge Gildea apparently did not open the floor for Karen Read’s attorneys to litigate hurt feelings over this morning’s reprimand. I bet Karen demanded that he respond. Judge Gildea shut it down. Repeatedly. The court already said what it said. This is an entirely different court.

@theginnyjamz @KevinCross12790 Karen only wants Alan to take his deposition. I bet he flew back. Otherwise another attorney would have lept at the chance and cleared anything on their calendar.

Live look at Karen and her attorneys. "Tomorrow no longer works for us. We didn't know if you would grant our request so we didn't leave it open." Shocking. Absolutely shocking. So what's the total now - 19 depositions they've canceled and had to reschedule? The judge certainly sounds like he's on to their games.

@TheMissyLerch @ilanus @KevinCross12790 That was glorious.

@ilanus @SnarkySticky @KevinCross12790 He seems so. He did it again just now. He knows their PR game and he’s not having it!

Today's message from Judge Gildea: "O’Keefe et al v. C&C Hospitality et al 2483CV692 June 8, 2026 Motion for Protective Order from Non-Party Michael Proctor For this case to proceed efficiently, and for our system of justice to work, certain basic things have to happen. A subpoena needs to mean something. A lawyer’s agreement needs to have meaning. Lawyers need to communicate with their clients. Clients need to keep their attorneys informed. When given an opportunity to provide support for a party’s request, that party needs to avail themselves of the opportunity. Based on the record before me, there is insufficient information to support a delay in the deposition going forward. However, given the claims made in the filings over the weekend, I will delay making a final decision on the motion until 4:00 p.m. today to give Mr. Proctor’s counsel the opportunity to supplement the record before me. The subpoena requiring Mr. Proctor to appear for a deposition today is stayed for 24 hours. Further hearing will be held today at 4:15 p.m. by Zoom. I followed up with Attorney Seligson with his reference to strategically preparing for the deposition because I read in the media of an appearance on the TODAY show Friday morning, where Ms. Read said filing her new civil lawsuit was always part of a plan she had. Beside her were attorneys Alan Jackson and Charles Waters, who cast the case as a bid to expose institutional corruption in Massachusetts law enforcement and to hold someone accountable for the death of her boyfriend, Officer John O’Keefe. Although there is no duty for Ms. Read’s counsel to have informed Mr. Proctor’s counsel of the intent to file the most recently filed Bristol County action, I think it is unreasonable to have not done so with a scheduled deposition pending, and then to have filed such action four (4) days before the scheduled deposition. The actions by counsel (Mr. Proctor’s counsel seeking to continue the deposition at the last moment, and Ms. Read’s counsel filing its new action four (4) days before a scheduled deposition with an obviously planned appearance on national television) brought to mind Comment 4 to Rule 3.5 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct wherein it is stated: “An advocate can present the cause, protect the record for subsequent review and preserve professional integrity by patient firmness no less effectively than by...theatrics.” As ST. Mary’s University School of Law Assistant Professor David Grenardo noted years ago at a conference on professional responsibility “Civility in the legal profession is generally defined as ‘treating others-opposing counsel, the court, clients, and others-with courtesy, dignity, and kindness.’” Mark C. Gildea, J."

@MontyBurnsSmith @SunnySpirit1919 That was the witness's memorandum.🤷

@SnarkySticky @SunnySpirit1919 Right my issue is continuing to give it life, it’s a slur against the witnesses, it’s meant to be hurtful. It’s used with venom on this site daily, I just followed you and I know you are not FKR it just is jarring seeing it in my feed and makes me question intent idk

Apparently, today was a great day to start a new smoky fire and hope nobody looked at the federal docket. Real issues are at stake for Karen Read in federal court. Buried under the noise, Read is asking to amend her opposition to dismissal and add new exhibits before the court rules. Meanwhile, the House Defendants, also known as the civilian witnesses Karen had the nerve to sue, filed a serious roadmap for dismissal against the federal case, one that she initiated with Section 1983 claims. Whatever you do, definitely do not pay attention to the following: Anti SLAPP; witness immunity; 12(b)(6); or the Statute of Limitations. I guarantee Judge Casper is very familiar with all of them.

💣The amended complaint in the defamation case is cleaner, and the theory is even sharper than the original. Their new counts: 📢Kearney = the megaphone. He published, livestreamed, monetized, harassed, amplified, sold the narrative, and kept the audience fed. 👑Read = the source/director/beneficiary. She fed him information, used intermediaries, encouraged the narrative, coordinated timing, benefited from the campaign, and used him to spread things she could not safely say herself. 🧼That is cleaner because it fits the facts. Kearney’s role is not mainly “aiding.” His role is doing the publishing. Read’s role is more vulnerable to an aiding-and-abetting theory because the complaint shows she was behind the scenes feeding, encouraging, and coordinating the content. 🧠That is why dropping the extra aiding-and-abetting counts against Kearney makes sense. He does not need to “aid and abet” the blast if he was the blast.

@TheMissyLerch @KevinCross12790 Not so subtle warning to Karen's attorneys from Judge Gildea that he is very familiar with the Rules of Professional Conduct. Try me.

@SnarkySticky @KevinCross12790 Theatrics❤️ He won’t stand for trying these cases in the media!

@TheSpiciestLRQ The funniest part is that Proctor asked for the delay, but Karen managed to get scolded. She is off to a great start with the Judge. 🤣

Karen Read and her attorneys violating rules of professional conduct and treating other attorneys with disrespect? HOW ENTIRELY UNSURPRISING.

1.) He pressed Proctor's team for more documentation/details of his unavailability and prep time. He continued it until 4:15 to provide the info. He didn't fully grant the delay but paused the depo for now (24 hours?). Read's side wanted reimbursement. 2.) Judge Gildea expressed frustration re: the Today Show appearance as an ambush tactic that complicated Proctor's prep.

@SnarkySticky @TweetyChick71 I missed it. Do you know what happened?

I know a lot of people are outraged that Proctor wants to reschedule his deposition in the wrongful death lawsuit, originally scheduled for tomorrow. I get it. And I will not pretend this is some casual scheduling issue either. However, Karen’s newest lawsuit changes the stakes. Her complaint needs Proctor to be more than a fired, disgusting cop. It needs him to be the bridge between vile texts and an alleged agency-wide conspiracy, planted evidence, corrupt prosecution, and a frame job. That is a lot of legal weight for one fired cop to carry. So if his attorneys want more time to prepare him, I understand why. This is sworn testimony. Every answer matters. Every inconsistency matters. Every “I don’t recall” matters. And yes, he can invoke the Fifth in a civil deposition if a specific answer could reasonably expose him to criminal liability. Of course, the judge is still asking the right questions: When did counsel know? When was the other side told? Why could prep not happen today or this weekend? And where are the receipts?

@TweetyChick71 @TeamFUKR Thank you!

@TeamFUKR @SnarkySticky This was the wrong code… Here are the zoom codes &, the one at 4:15 will be at the one for the 4th session. 😉

@TeamFUKR Can you share it again? Thank you.

@SnarkySticky Do you have the zoom code?

Probably the same things that allow a lot of bad cops to get too comfortable: bad supervision, weak accountability, old boys’ networks, and people looking away until it becomes impossible. I have never defended that. Fire them. Expose them. Investigate who knew what and when. But that still does not magically prove Karen Read was framed, evidence was planted, every witness lied, every prosecutor joined in, and two entire departments became a murder conspiracy.

@SnarkySticky @friskytrtlluv97 What exactly do you think allowed those 2 cops to feel comfortable enough to speak freely like that, to get away with their shit for so long??

Breaking: Karen Read found 2 disgusting cops out of roughly 2,540 officers across two agencies and tried to turn that into her valiant effort to "conquer statewide corruption." 👮MSP: 1 out of about 2,500 = 0.04%. 🚔Canton PD: 1 out of about 40 = 2.5%. 👮🚔Combined: 2 out of about 2,540 = 0.08%. ✅Vile texts? Yes. ❌Institutional rot, planted evidence, and a murder conspiracy? Bless your lonely revenge-filled heart. 🖤🖤🖤

@FairbairnJohn ?

@SnarkySticky All the evidence I need I'm from here and know more than most

@Case1034521625 That is image management.

@SnarkySticky She knows there's people out there that won't buy her bullshit anymore.

If she admits that normal people think she may have gotten away with killing John O’Keefe, then the public story evaporates. It's a control move aimed at creating the impression of social consensus. "Everyone who meets me believes me." It also protects her victim narrative. She will only frame doubt as something that exists among the people who framed her.

@commcenterpod @JulieCar94 But she says that his family knows what kind of person she is. And how generous she was with the time she allotted them.

@SnarkySticky @JulieCar94 Kissed him under John’s roof.

Good time to revisit this. Karen was pursuing Higgins, not the other way around. I cannot imagine a more disinterested response than the ones he's gave her on January 23rd, the last time the pair spoke before the night of John O'Keefe's death. This was not a man so passionate about a woman he would contemplate murder.

@NoodleMom1983 He's 100 right. The conspiracy narrative was always absurd. The evidence did not disappear because Proctor and Goode turned out to be disgusting. Vile texts may prove vile texts. They do not magically prove planted evidence, a frame job, causation, or damages.

Dave Aronberg, former State Prosecutor for Palm Beach, Florida, remarks on Karen Read’s newest lawsuit. He says (I’m paraphrasing): 📌 The goal of the suit is PR to help her in her other suits. 📌 The defense’s conspiracy narrative was utterly absurd. 📌 There was/is a massive amount of evidence pointing to her guilt. 📌 Her lawsuit will eventually be dismissed.

I think she really believed they were going to “kill it” on live TV. Karen would perform brave victim. Alan would perform as the victorious lawyer that got her off. Waters would perform serious civil rights counsel. The awful texts would become the whole story. Instead, the hosts asked normal questions, and the whole production started wobbling. Loved every second.

Why would an innocent person need two lawyers to speak on the Today Show? There is no risk because of double jeopardy. If she was framed and acquitted what is she afraid of?