Leviathan

I HAVE PERFECTLY PREDICTED THIS PUMP 10 DAYS AGO THIS IS JUST A FAKEOUT, REAL BOTTOM ISN'T IN YET AS EXPECTED, MARKET IN A LONG ORDER FLOW NOW FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON, I WILL KEEP YOU UPDATED

@WhaleNoName 👀

🚨 BTC IS REPEATING A WORRYING PATTERN! Just look at the chart We’ve seen this exact structure before - 2022 bull trap confirmed - 2026 bull trap loading $70k resistance is holding firm If the fractal plays out, a deeper flush is next... Turn notifs ON for the next move!

@DeFiTracer following with notis on

$BTC ALWAYS FOLLOW ONE PATTERN This pattern has been very mechanical and fully controlled by MM Over the last two years, we have seen strong price fluctuations Correction -> Accumulation -> Leg up within 3 weeks If you CAN'T TRADE something this easy I HAVE A SOLUTION You should FOLLOW me and TURN NOTIS ON I always WARN YOU when you need to make a move 👀

@gmulun 🧐

MOST CRYPTO TOKENS FOLLOW THE SAME PATTERN Narratives drive flows, attention fuels them and liquidity follows. But this isn’t sustainable - eventually, capital stops chasing stories and follows real money. This repeats every cycle - DeFi, NFTs, AI, memecoins. Narratives change, but behavior doesn’t: price runs ahead of reality, then reality catches up. While most chase the next narrative, some sectors quietly generate revenue - iGaming is a prime example. iGaming isn’t a trend; it’s one of the oldest, most consistent industries. People gamble in bull markets, bear markets and quiet periods - demand is structural, not cyclical. The disconnect: crypto casinos earn huge daily cash flow, but their tokens often lack revenue links, have high emissions, treasury-funded buybacks and little utility. Even if the business succeeds, the token often doesn’t. Retail watches charts; experienced participants track real money flow. Without buybacks, burns or yield, a token is just a narrative and narratives fade. Key filters: real revenue, clear token-revenue link, emissions ≤ demand and genuine users. Miss one, and you risk becoming exit liquidity. Most iGaming platforms don’t need tokens. Tokens should capture value, not sustain the system. Strong businesses with weak token design create mispricing - common in crypto until it corrects. We’ve seen this before: fundamentals get ignored while hype spikes and crashes. Revenue grows slowly, compounds and sustains. Signs of a quiet shift are emerging - less noise, more focus on revenue. That’s why I’m watching @1winToken. With 8+ years, millions of users, and real revenue, the hard part is done. The key question: does this value flow into the token? The model aligns value through revenue-funded buybacks, usage-based burns and ecosystem integration, letting platform activity affect token supply. Unlike speculation-first models, the business comes first. Much iGaming volume is off-chain, so on-chain data understates the scale. If off-chain flow connects to the token, it creates something rare in crypto: demand that doesn’t rely on hype. In the end, it comes down to one question - is the token capturing real value or just attention? Attention fades; revenue doesn’t. When the market finally prices this in, it usually happens fast - quietly, before it’s obvious

@degargoyle 🤣🤣🤣

DOES ANYONE EVEN STILL TRADE MEMES? $PEPE - looks unstoppable… until volume disappears $DOGE - “the people’s coin”… until the cycle rotates $BONK - fastest hype on Solana… fastest fade after So where are they now? Right - at the bottom Why? Because that was the meta of 2021-2024 When any narrative could fly without fundamentals just on liquidity inflow > Endless liquidity > Endless hype > Endless belief that “this time it’s different” But this market has changed Today projects grow thanks to a sustainable foundation clear economics and mechanisms that work not only in a bull market And if we draw an analogy the best contrast to the meme sector right now is iGaming > Same explosive numbers > Same user flow > Same ability to scale fast But compared to memes the nature of this money is completely different For memes it is Price = Function of attention For iGaming: Price = Function of model That’s why the growth potential of these narratives is similar but the further progress is fundamentally different Although here you also need to be careful because like in any other niche in iGaming there are dishonest or low-quality cases especially if: > The token is not connected to the product > Buybacks come not from revenue but from treasury > There is no real use-case > Liquidity is limited to one chain But of course there are exceptions and personally for me one of the best cases as an example is @1winToken I want to note that they have existed for 10 years and have only been growing during this period And now let’s move to the key advantages that caught my attention: > Userbase of millions of users = demand > Buyback from revenue and therefore it’s not “support” but constant pressure from the business > Dual-native (BNB + SOL) more markets = more liquidity > Regular token burns > Integration into an already existing product If we sum it all up: Memes = pure speculation iGaming (when built properly) = speculation + fundamentals And this combination is what makes the difference Essentially the same growth dynamics but a completely different quality of holding The story of “catching hype” is over now only those with fundamentals win and this project has it NFA DYOR

@0xbeehive good one

MOST TOKENS IN CRYPTO HAVE NO REVENUE AT ALL And this is really the main problem Agree, we evaluate projects by: 1) Narratives 2) Liquidity 3) Attention But almost never by their revenue AND THAT’S A MISTAKE! It is revenue that determines whether a token can exist without a constant inflow of new money Just remember: What does a typical token look like? > No business model > No stable cashflow > Value is held only by demand This is basically pure speculation... And now let’s consider another model: Revenue-backed tokens -> There is a product -> There are users -> There is revenue And most importantly: This revenue is integrated into tokenomics You might ask what does this give? 1) Buyback from profit 2) Supply reduction 3) Additional demand through utility Meaning the token gets support not only from the market, but also from the platform itself And here’s an interesting point! In the iGaming sector, such models are already working Platforms generate large revenue and direct part of this income to buy back tokens from the market That’s why this narrative is gaining momentum now In this context, it becomes interesting to look at projects that are trying to combine business and token For example, @1winToken is betting on this exact model, where the token is tied to the real economy of the platform. And if such a structure works correctly, it looks much stronger than most of the market. Why? Because at some point attention disappears, but revenue DOES NOT! That’s why the next stage of the market will belong to revenue-backed models Be ready, this is truly a fundamental shift in the market! !!!DYOR!!!

@0xAralez 👀

$BTC Spot on 🎯 You know next move - turn notifs on...

@DeFiTracer this is massive

🚨 BREAKING: BINANCE FOUNDER CZ JUST SAID LIVE: "WE ARE IN A SUPERCYCLE AND $BTC ABOUT TO GO PARABOLIC" HE DEFINITELY KNOWS THE PUMP IS COMING!!

@gmulun 👀

$BTC coiling for a strong upside move Head & Shoulders pattern pointing higher Expansion coming - stay tuned

@0xklarck good one

@0xklarck 👀

$BTC Bear still in early innings - ~40% done Sep-Oct ’26 bottom likely - shakeout pending Real bottom still ahead - turn notifs on

@LintonWorm 👀

HERE’S WHAT I LOOK AT BEFORE TOUCHING ANY IGAMING TOKEN You don’t need to chase every new token You don’t need to jump into the first shit that’s pumping You don’t need to play against the system iGaming itself is a great niche but most people trade shitcoins that have no background behind them That’s why you can’t do without proper market analysis here And here’s what I look at first: 1. IS THERE A BUYBACK AND WHERE DOES IT COME FROM If buybacks come from revenue -> that’s permanent demand If from treasury -> that’s just temporary support 2. IS THERE A REAL USE-CASE Always ask yourself: "Is the token used in the product or does it just exist for trading?" If it’s the latter then it’s the same meme just in a different wrapper 3. HOW SUPPLY WORKS Burn / staking / fee redistribution / Any else ? Is supply decreasing over time or just getting diluted? 4. WHERE DOES LIQUIDITY COME FROM One chain -> limited market Multiple ecosystems -> broader access and more stable circulation And in the iGaming narrative these things decide everything A token without a product = just exit liquidity A token without buyback = no stable demand A token without supply control = dilution And this is important to understand cause iGaming is one of the few narratives in crypto with real and and a steady cash flow Products in this niche generate revenue regardless of the market and that’s exactly what brings new demand So instead of speaking abstractly let’s look at one of the top cases right now - Shuffle ($SHFL) This is exactly an example where almost all these criteria are already implemented - The token is actually used inside the platform - There is staking + rewards + integration into gameplay - Buyback + burn model is working - Demand doesn’t come only from speculation But even here supply is distributed and will gradually enter the market This is a good example of a working model but not ideal If we look at new projects in this sector then for comparison with $SHFL, @1wintoken fits perfectly Take a look: - Buyback is formed from real revenue - The token is immediately integrated into the product - There are burn / staking / cashback / fee mechanisms - Multi-market liquidity (BNB + SOL) And in fact we have similar projects but with different starting points $SHFL - this is already a FORMED CASE that shows how an iGaming token works @1wintoken - this is an attempt to scale this model onto an already EXISTING product And in my opinion this is definitely an advantage because the economic component of the token will not depend on circumstances This is a good case for observation and research so it’s interesting to see what comes out of it and how iGaming will develop overall NFA DYOR

🚨 BREAKING: 🇺🇸 US SENATE WILL DISCUSS THE $BTC AND CRYPTO MARKET BILL TOMORROW AT 2:00 AM ET THIS BILL WILL INJECT OVER $2 TRILLION INTO THE MARKET GIGA BULLISH FOR CRYPTO!!

@philarekt LFG that's huge

@0xAralez 👀

$BTC The market nearing a real breakout… Bear Market flow continues - new lows incoming Turn notifs on - I'll post next market move

@0xbeehive 🧐

$BTC JUST HIT KEY SUPPORT ZONE 1ST TARGET -> $69K -> NOW ✅ 2ND TARGET -> $65K -> NEXT ⏳ POSITION ACCORDINGLY!

@ardizor 🧐🧐

Should i buy this chart ?

@DeFiTracer must read right now

🚨 JAPAN IS PREPARING SOMETHING EXTREMLY BAD!! If you hold at least some kind of asset, - Stocks - Crypto - Bonds - Or even the dollar You MUST read this post, before it's too late. The encirclement of Taiwan, and its possible administrative BLOCKADE. Hits the most painful spots of Japan, and here’s why. Japan imports around 60% of its microchips from Taiwan. If the strait gets blocked: - Toyota - Honda - Sony WILL STOP IN JUST A WEEK Which will deal a DEVASTATING blow to Japan’s economy. Yes, you may say that Japan is already subsidizing the construction of TSMC factories in Kumamoto, to have chips on hand. BUT these factories will only operate at full capacity by 2027–2028, RIGHT NOW THEY ARE VERY VULNERABLE. And Japan perfectly understands that its only defensive asset is BITCOIN Which does not depend on logistics in the Pacific Ocean. But the price of $BTC right now is not favorable for Japan, and they want to buy it cheaper, at least by 20%. THAT IS EXACTLY WHY they are raising the interest rate in April to 1%. Historically, Bitcoin reacts very painfully to the actions of the Bank of Japan. This is related to the “yen carry trader”. Investors for years borrowed cheap yen at 0% and used it to buy risk assets (US stocks, and Bitcoin). And when Japan RAISES RATES, these loans become expensive, and investors panic, and start selling BITCOIN to save yen. In January 2026, the rate hike to 0.75, already caused a drop in $BTC. So the upcoming rate hike to 1%, is ABSOLUTELY PLANNED. Japan can buy BITCOIN, its only SAVE ASSET in this situation, at a better price... BUT don’t worry, I am here so that I DO NOT LET you GET FOOLED. I have been in THE market for over 10 years now, and I know what to do next. When I start buying the BOTTOM, I will call it publicly here, as I always do. Follow me, and turn NOTIFICATIONS ON, so you don’t miss my next move. Many people will regret not following me earlier...