Chadjeet Singh

72.1K posts

Chadjeet Singh banner
Chadjeet Singh

Chadjeet Singh

@TrueIndicAryan

Father of cumskin 🇺🇸

Bergabung Haziran 2017
855 Mengikuti598 Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
Chadjeet Singh
Chadjeet Singh@TrueIndicAryan·
Whites were then committing crime against animals Whites are still committing crime against animals These barbarians should get extinct
Chadjeet Singh tweet media
English
0
1
3
114
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
Priya
Priya@priyaakulkarni2·
Indian-American couple gives USD 5.5 million for healthcare infra in US in Texas This story doesn't fit their anti-India narrative. share.google/D6326OIpAaiHvI…
Priya tweet media
English
6
174
611
9.1K
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
Mama Bear 🏆
Mama Bear 🏆@CanadianGirlee·
I have no interest in listening to @BlondeBigot11 host her pathetic “white nationalist” Spaces, but I’d been told she’d mentioned me several times lately, so I made another account to listen in. Apparently I’m a “coward” because Jo says I’m listening anonymously in the “Jew tunnel.” She blocked me ages ago therefore I cannot listen even if I wanted to. 🤦‍♀️ Anyway, to let everyone know I was there, I posted a few comments. Just as I expected, the moment she noticed me she ran straight to the Indian man that pretends to be white @MarcusHalbs6969 who obsessively trolls me and like clockwork, the childish insults, lies, threats, and doxxing began. If I actually cared what any of these people thought of me, I never would have made myself known in the first place. 🤦‍♀️ The funniest part is that these self-described “white nationalists” spend their time having some of the most immature and boring conversations imaginable. They do absolutely nothing for the “movement” and only embarrass true white nationalists. My last comment, I mentioned that some of Blondie’s old friends from Maple Ridge had reached out to me recently and I was instantly blocked. Apparently someone doesn’t want certain truths being discussed. Oh, and I had a good laugh because the racists were also fighting among themselves. A few even left when @genocidalgirl started speaking because they think she’s unhinged and an embarrassment. I almost had respect for people like @BasedMaidens2 for at least recognizing a lunatic when they see one. That all said, not one of my most mature moments, but I had a good laugh at least. These people like to call me a coward yet 99% of them are hiding behind fake accounts. Make that make sense. 🤦‍♀️ oh and of course @MarcusHalbs6969 had a lot to say aside from taking me up on my offer once again. Too funny.
Mama Bear 🏆 tweet mediaMama Bear 🏆 tweet mediaMama Bear 🏆 tweet mediaMama Bear 🏆 tweet media
English
1
1
13
156
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
Acyuta
Acyuta@AgniVesa_07·
They will post shit like this and cry about muslims in gaza
Acyuta tweet media
English
21
255
2.3K
17.5K
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
విష్ణు వర్ధన్ రెడ్డి-विष्णु वर्धन रेड्डी🇮🇳
𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 🧡🤍
FalconUpdatesHQ@FalconUpdatesHQ

𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 🤍

English
1
43
142
1.1K
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
Mikasa
Mikasa@moonilight25·
Good morning
Mikasa tweet media
English
2
22
147
1.4K
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
Rahul Shivshankar
Rahul Shivshankar@RShivshankar·
JUDGE, JURY, EXECUTIONER: AMERICAN EXCESS. 3 INDIAN LIVES & A TEST FOR INDIAN DIPLOMACY. This is the story of American military and executive excess on the one hand and the INEFFECTUALITY of Indian diplomacy on the other. It’s a story about the killing of three Indians on the high seas by a Trump led America that, critics argue, has increasingly exercised powers beyond those recognised under international law. Three Indian seafarers, deck cadet Aditya Sharma, engine fitter Shivanand Chaurasia, and chief engineer Patnala Suresh, found themselves in the crosshairs of the American Navy just off the coast of Oman in the Arabian Sea. The three Indian seafarers, along with 21 other crew members, were aboard the Settebello, a Palau-flagged vessel. Little did they know that they had been arbitrarily awarded a death sentence by a US Navy that was acting as judge, jury, and executioner. The munition fired by the US Navy that tore through the engine room vapourised the seafarers. The US Central Command said that the crew was guilty of violating an arbitrary American blockade by "attempting to transport oil from Iran". In fact, the statement accused the crew of having "repeatedly failed to comply" with American forces. Manoj Yadav, general secretary of the Forward Seamen's Union of India, has said that he "refused to believe" that the US lacked information regarding the nationalities of the people on board those ships. Why didn’t, he asked, the US simply detain the ship, especially since the ship was unarmed and its crew was absolutely defenceless? To be sure, Washington would argue that the vessel was engaged in sanctions-busting activity linked to Iran and that American forces were acting under their own rules of engagement. Yet even if one accepts that contention, serious questions remain about proportionality, due process, and jurisdiction. Was an unarmed merchant vessel posing an imminent threat? Could interception, boarding, or detention have achieved the same objective without loss of life? Those questions deserve answers. But the bigger and more immediate one is, who has given the US Navy the right to assume the role of lawmaker, law enforcer, and lawgiver? No one, if one were to strictly apply the tenets of the UN Charter. The Articles of the UN Charter strictly prohibit the use of force between states except in two scenarios: when authorised by the UN Security Council or in self-defence against an active or imminent armed attack (Article 51). Critics argue that the strikes lack a valid self-defence justification or Security Council mandate. Second, the US is, according to critics, enforcing an illegal blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The UN's maritime agency, the International Maritime Organization, has consistently upheld the principle that no country has a unilateral right to obstruct international transit through strategic straits. If that principle is accepted, then the legal basis for the use of force against civilian shipping becomes even more questionable. While the US under Trump may be in contempt of the spirit of international law, the point is that the law needs to be read persuasively to the United States at the highest diplomatic level. Unfortunately, this is where Delhi appears to have arguably fallen short.
English
33
127
339
9.2K
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
The Nationalist Hindu ࿗
The Nationalist Hindu ࿗@The_Nlst_Hindu·
This is beautiful India but Elon’s X algo only pushes Indian slums and poverty.
English
1
112
423
3.1K
Chadjeet Singh me-retweet
Dhrithi ॐ
Dhrithi ॐ@DivaDhrithi·
This is beautiful India but Elon’s X algo only pushes Indian slums and poverty
English
0
24
84
444