Tweet Disematkan
C.O😎
32.8K posts
C.O😎
@_C___O_
MB;BS👨⚕️⚕️🩺, writer, lover of history, #NFT enthusiast and a football addict. #GGMU❤❤❤❤
Ona Orun Bergabung Kasım 2017
2K Mengikuti1.3K Pengikut
C.O😎 me-retweet
Your point sounds sophisticated but it’s actually built on the false separation you tried to infuse.
Let’s start with Bruno Fernandes;
You called him a “volume creator” like it’s a limitation. Volume at that level isn’t fluke, it’s sustained world class decision making under pressure.
He executes high level actions early and often, he recognizes patterns faster than most players, he delivers before defenses can reset, he creates repeatable danger which is far more reliable over a season than sporadic brilliance.
You don’t consistently rank among the top chance creators in Europe by just forcing situations. If it were that easy, everyone would do it including Cherki.
Thierry Henry didn’t call Bruno “Braino Fernandes” cause he’s good at golf.
Now compared to Rayan Cherki;
Cherki has flair and is unpredictable at times but calling that superior creativity ignores key factors which are consistency and impact.
Creating “harder” chances like you said isn’t automatically better if they happen less often and they don’t translate into sustained attacking output.
The biggest flaw in your argument is this phrase “Bruno depends more on structure, Cherki is the structure.”
Take Bruno Fernandes out of Manchester United’s lineup and watch them look dysfunctional and out of ideas but if Cherki doesn’t play for City, they still function as a team.
Structure is what wins games at the highest level and being able to operate within a system, elevate your teammates consistently and still produce elite numbers every year.
That is harder than pulling off occasional moments of invention.
If creativity is about aesthetics, Cherki might edge that but if creativity is about breaking defenses consistently, decisively and effectively then Bruno is boss and he’s operating at a level Cherki hasn’t reached and until Cherki can match that influence over time, calling him the most creative player in the league isn’t analysis, it’s preference in disguise of philosophy.
Ororo😎@McFlybowy
I know he’s 6 assists behind Bruno, but he’s the most creative player in the league, in a way a Bruno can’t be. Because creativity isn’t just numbers alone, it’s type of chances you create. Bruno Fernandes is a volume creator. He plays early, he plays often, he forces situations. A lot of his creativity comes from repetition crosses, through balls, set-pieces, constant risk-taking. That’s why the assist numbers are always high. It’s pressure over time. But Rayan Cherki is a different kind of creator entirely. He creates chances that aren’t supposed to exist. It’s the weight of pass when there’s no angle. The disguised slip when defenders think the play is dead. The ability to draw three players in, freeze them, and then release the ball at the exact last second. That’s not volume creativity, that’s imagination-based creativity. Bruno sees passes early. Cherki sees them late….. when no one else can. And that’s the difference. Because when you defend Bruno, you’re preparing for patterns….runs in behind, early crosses, quick through balls When you defend Cherki, there is no pattern. He can stand still for two seconds and still break your entire shape with one touch. Also, Cherki’s creativity is tied to his 1v1 threat. That’s what makes it more dangerous. He doesn’t need movement around him to create he can generate the advantage himself. Beat a man, attract another, then create. Bruno depends more on structure, Cherki is the structure. So even if the stats say Bruno is ahead, the reality is… Bruno creates more chances. Cherki creates harder chances,Bruno relies on repetition, Cherki relies on invention And when you talk about pure creativity, that’s where Cherki sits in a space Bruno simply doesn’t operate in.
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
My greatest problem is that y'all treat politics and elections like a game of tinko tinko
Cuz the fuck do you mean "I was going to vote for Peter Obi but you insulted me so now I'm going to vote for Tinubu"???
Is this fucking Grade 1??????
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
From Pharisee to Tax Collector: Rethinking Tinubu’s Kenyan Comparison
In a recent remark in Yenagoa, Bola Ahmed Tinubu suggested that Nigerians should find solace in being “better off than Kenya and other African countries.” While this may have been intended to soften the impact of economic hardship and rising fuel prices, the comment risks downplaying the severity of the current crisis. It echoes the biblical parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector in the Gospel of Luke (18:9–14). A similar warning is found in the Qur’an (53:32), which cautions against self-righteousness.
Like the Pharisee who boasted of his superiority over others to mask his own spiritual void, such downward comparisons serve more as a refuge than a remedy. This validated an earlier dismissive remark by President Ahmed Bola Tinubu during electioneering: “Na statistics we go shop?” Yet statistics remain indispensable - they are the language through which nations understand their condition and chart progress. No country can develop in isolation from measurable realities or without comparing itself with peers. Comparisons, when properly grounded, are not instruments of escapism but tools of accountability. What is objectionable is not comparison itself, but comparison stripped of credible, verifiable data—mere tax collector comparisons that soothe rather than solve.
On key development indicators such as security, the Human Development Index, life expectancy, GDP per capita, literacy levels, and electricity access, Kenya consistently outperforms Nigeria. Nigeria is the fourth most terrorised nation in the world, while Kenya is not among the ten worst. Kenya’s HDI ranking is 143 out of 180 countries, with a coefficient of about 0.630, compared to Nigeria’s ranking of 164 out of 180, with a coefficient of about 0.530. Its GDP per capita is roughly $2,200–$2,300, compared to Nigeria’s $807–$835. Kenya’s poverty rate is about 43% of the population (approximately 23 million people), while Nigeria’s is about 63% (around 150 million people), over six times that of Kenya. Kenya’s life expectancy is about 67 years, while Nigeria’s is about 54 years. The literacy rate in Kenya is approximately 81–85%, compared to Nigeria’s 62–65%.
Kenya’s electricity access is higher, while Nigeria has one of the lowest levels of electricity access in the world. Kenya has about 3.5 million out-of-school children, while Nigeria has about 20 million. Kenya’s inflation rate has been about 4.5% or lower over the past three years, while Nigeria’s has remained above 15% within the same period. Kenya’s exchange rate has been around USD 1 to KES 130 over the past three years, whereas Nigeria’s exchange rate rose from below ₦500/$1 to above ₦1,250/$1 within the same period. Even with developments in the Middle East and rising oil prices, Kenyans have not experienced the sharp increases in petroleum product prices seen in Nigeria.
Across other key indicators, Kenya also performs better. In the end, these indices clearly show that Kenya ranks higher than Nigeria on several development metrics. The standard of living of Kenyans is better than that of Nigerians. If the President considers Kenyans to be suffering despite these stronger figures, then Nigerians are in a far more difficult situation. He should therefore refrain from self-consolation and, in honest reflection, take responsibility for the situation and make a determined effort to drive improvement. This requires a posture of humility, accountability, and commitment to addressing the factors that have slowed Nigeria’s development.
A new Nigeria is POssible. -PO
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
That's your own TL o.
On my own, all of us want Tinubu and his government to collapse.
A♡@Ashhleyyyya
Half of twitter is horny and the other half is suicidal.
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
Friendly babes, they irritate me so much. You bring your babe around the squad and she’s shinning teeth and chatting with everyone 🤮🤮
Abby baby 🦋@_babygirlabby
I want to hear men’s icks too 😂😂😂
English
@Airboitin @iLatif_ Meanwhile, Cherki also takes set-pieces for City. He's just not good enough to convert them into assists
English
@StefanTochukwu Lmao, how?
They said there's nothing too stupid for a Nigerian to defend and here you are, proving that theory right
English
@Mc_Rozay_ Remove Ifs and Bruno still has more GAs than Cherki, still the better player than he is.
English
Man U fans argument all the time😂😂.. *if you this *if you that
AARONATION 👽@Aaron_Magook
Meanwhile Bruno Fernandes vs Man City with Cherki on the pitch and also his first game coming back from a muscle injury. If you switch both players between the two clubs, Cherki wouldn't get more assists than Dalot in a single season at United There is nothing of importance on the pitch that Cherki does better than Bruno Fernandes Cherki might be better than Palmer on your avi but he's nowhere near Bruno Fernandes.
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
Meanwhile Bruno Fernandes vs Man City with Cherki on the pitch and also his first game coming back from a muscle injury.
If you switch both players between the two clubs, Cherki wouldn't get more assists than Dalot in a single season at United
There is nothing of importance on the pitch that Cherki does better than Bruno Fernandes
Cherki might be better than Palmer on your avi but he's nowhere near Bruno Fernandes.
Ororo😎@McFlybowy
I know he’s 6 assists behind Bruno, but he’s the most creative player in the league, in a way a Bruno can’t be. Because creativity isn’t just numbers alone, it’s type of chances you create. Bruno Fernandes is a volume creator. He plays early, he plays often, he forces situations. A lot of his creativity comes from repetition crosses, through balls, set-pieces, constant risk-taking. That’s why the assist numbers are always high. It’s pressure over time. But Rayan Cherki is a different kind of creator entirely. He creates chances that aren’t supposed to exist. It’s the weight of pass when there’s no angle. The disguised slip when defenders think the play is dead. The ability to draw three players in, freeze them, and then release the ball at the exact last second. That’s not volume creativity, that’s imagination-based creativity. Bruno sees passes early. Cherki sees them late….. when no one else can. And that’s the difference. Because when you defend Bruno, you’re preparing for patterns….runs in behind, early crosses, quick through balls When you defend Cherki, there is no pattern. He can stand still for two seconds and still break your entire shape with one touch. Also, Cherki’s creativity is tied to his 1v1 threat. That’s what makes it more dangerous. He doesn’t need movement around him to create he can generate the advantage himself. Beat a man, attract another, then create. Bruno depends more on structure, Cherki is the structure. So even if the stats say Bruno is ahead, the reality is… Bruno creates more chances. Cherki creates harder chances,Bruno relies on repetition, Cherki relies on invention And when you talk about pure creativity, that’s where Cherki sits in a space Bruno simply doesn’t operate in.
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
C.O😎 me-retweet
My own TL
Half of Twitter wants Tinubu out, the other half are horny but still wants tinubu out
A♡@Ashhleyyyya
Half of twitter is horny and the other half is suicidal.
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
My next move will be to get my permanent voter's card so I can vote Tinubu out.
Ara🤍@Araoluwanimi01
He slaps your girlfriend, what would be your next move?🤔
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
C.O😎 me-retweet
C.O😎 me-retweet
We must endeavour to take the next election seriously. We are suffering as a people.
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
C.O😎 me-retweet
enough talking online come outside!🇳🇬
nigeria must work & be great🇳🇬!
English
C.O😎 me-retweet
C.O😎 me-retweet
One of my favourite short form stories is the one told by Leo Tostoy.
It's called "How much land does a man need."
It tells the story of a peasant named Pahom, who believes that if he only had enough land, he wouldn’t fear anything—not even the devil.
Here's how it goes:
Pahom lives a simple life but envies landowners. When he finally gets the chance to buy some land, he feels satisfied… briefly.
Soon, he wants more. And when he gets more, he still isn’t content. The more land he acquires, the more greedy and restless he becomes.
One day, he hears of a distant group of people- the Bashkirs— who are willing to sell land at a very cheap rate.
This is where it gets interesting:
Their deal is simple:
For a fixed price, you can have as much land as you can walk around in a single day.
But there’s a catch — you must return to your starting point before sunset, or you lose everything.
Excited, Pahom sets out early in the morning. As he walks, he keeps pushing further, thinking, “Just a little more land… just a bit more.”
He ignores the heat, exhaustion, and time.
By afternoon, he realizes he’s gone too far and must rush back before sunset. Panicked, he starts running. His body is failing, his breath is heavy, but greed drives him forward.
Just as the sun is setting, he reaches the starting point and collapses.
Dead.
In the end, his servant buries him in a grave.
Six feet long.
The lesson:
All the land he chased…
All he truly needed…
was enough to be buried in.
I hope that answers the question of how much money is really enough money
TG OMORI@boy_director
How much money is really enough money?
English