Sam Carter

Excited to have this coming out with @simondgoldstein! tl,dr: want to be less ignorant? maybe you should try having less accurate evidence...

@larkofadefinite 'end credits' -- you can add bloopers mid-way through like it's a 90s movie.

@alexxguss Kyle Blumberg & John Hawthorne have a cool new paper on this which I think includes a lot of really interesting observations. philpapers.org/rec/BLUANH-3

@rachelefraser Congratulations! Was just about to send you an email about this paper!

@cmlittlejohn I've always been a little unclear what's supposed to happen on the belief-map metaphor if I think San Antonio is west of Austin and think Houston is west of Galveston but am unopinionated about whether Austin is east or west of Houston

@bweatherson @Jrgwilliams2 some evidence against this reading: whatever this means, it doesn't seem equivalent to `think something you don't believe'

strict-tolerant crew are out there winning hearts and minds...

@judge_jen @maria_esipova My fiance and I went for a drink there on our first date. Even on syntax-independent grounds, it was excellent.

it exists!!

@LedermanHarvey I mean, it was a breakfast burrito, but that seems like a whole other issue...

@_sjbc was there anything on the sandwich

Seriously though: why is there something rather than nothing?

@Dr_Semantic @hanreeeee you're telling me in LA it's a ...noun?

@_sjbc @hanreeeee See 5:45 onwards in this comedic sketch: youtu.be/NpcrYS8l64A

Why bother writing out what you can say simply by sticking \sffamily at the top of your document

@jasonintrator so true - apparently galen rupp claims to have run a 2:06 marathon.

@LedermanHarvey @hanreeeee or how I learned to stop worrying and became an applied epistemologist

@_sjbc @hanreeeee applying epistemology to epistemology

@danielwharris Looks cool!

@NarsiMarsi Enjoyed the original, excited for the sequel

It builds on a previous paper published in 2018 in Analysis (philpapers.org/rec/MARTAA-35), and responds to some objections by John Turri. 2/2

My latest paper on the norm of assertion is now out in Episteme. It argues that truth is the AIM (rather than the RULE) of assertion. Open Access (FirstView) here: doi.org/10.1017/epi.20… 1/2