mimaklas

2.6K posts

mimaklas

mimaklas

@cryptomits

Bergabung Şubat 2018
1.2K Mengikuti592 Pengikut
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
HybridVaults are deployed - with WETH for +25M capacity (as a small pilot run). This will be one of the safe scaling backbones of @yieldbasis. Vote to enable: yieldbasis.com/proposal/35
English
4
18
82
10K
mimaklas me-retweet
yieldbasis
yieldbasis@yieldbasis·
veYB holders it’s time to vote. almost at quorum.
yieldbasis tweet media
English
3
5
32
2.2K
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
We are at final phases of testing the HybridVaults for @yieldbasis (as you can guess by looking at GitHub). The plan is to have this small with the current pools - starting with WETH pool (to test the approach and help crvUSD peg), and really SCALE when we have new pool code
Michael Egorov tweet media
English
14
20
129
6.4K
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
Update: not risk management: CeDeFi at its finest! Avoid protocols which can change code by admin keys. They are not DeFi
OShield 🛡️@oshield_io

Update — @DriftProtocol uses two different multisig wallets both with the same set of members. 1 ) Risk Council — 2-of-5 multisig that two of the keys were compromised to upgrade the program’s admin key and setup the vault for the scam token CVT app.squads.so/squads/AiLGdNi… 1) Program Upgrade — 3-of-5 multisig that around an hour ago signed a transaction to upgrade the program. It was approved by the other 3 members apart from the confirmed 2 compromised members. app.squads.so/squads/Ad21qwC… Attacker most likely did not compromise all wallets as the program upgrade seems to be benevolent. This is CRAZY!

English
6
20
193
23.6K
mimaklas me-retweet
yieldbasis
yieldbasis@yieldbasis·
it’s coming hybrid vaults audited by @chain_security & @mixbytes #hybrid-vaults" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.yieldbasis.com/user/audits-bu…
English
8
17
85
8.3K
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
Well said
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper

I’ve written plenty on it in the past so won’t spend an essay on it today, but when it comes to stablecoins (including those for ETH or other reference assets), hard-coded oracles are brittle. They work until they catastrophically don’t. In contrast, live oracles allow for real-time risk mitigation, but at the cost of punishing users for false positives if liquidity dries up. Both are a legitimate design choice, but need to follow different underwriting processes. Only hard code if you diligence the underlying asset and are confident in its ability to meet redemptions as designed. Both the technical and financial fundamentals must be solid, and assign a risk premium to rates or haircut to LTV as appropriate. Live oracles let you be relatively agnostic about the quality of the asset (beyond technical safety of the smart contracts) and stay focused on the liquidity availability. Let’s also remember that more complex oracle setups are also possible. I personally have advocated for stablecoins to have a hard code when n liquidity is viable in a redemption contract and then switch to market price oracles the moment liquidity falls below n. Ultimately, this is surfacing again a longstanding “credit migration” problem where DeFi relies on curators and risk consultants to manually flag when an asset goes from excellent to good to fair to poor as collateral. That’s far too slow in cases like USR, even if it was 100% accurate. DeFi automates, speeds up, and simplifies (even if it sometimes seems otherwise) finance compared to traditional alternatives. We’re ultimately building financial vending machines, and it’s just a fact that it’s really hard to make a machine that works as intended under all conditions. But there’s clear ways to improve on both oracle design and oracle use, and it’s disappointing to see slow innovation on that front.

English
3
2
28
9.5K
mimaklas me-retweet
Statemind
Statemind@statemindio·
New from Statemind: we dove deep into @CurveFinance's Donations mechanism for CryptoPool. How pools can be "refueled" when fees aren't enough for repegs, with built-in safety considerations. Full breakdown → statemind.io/blog/curve-cry…
Statemind tweet media
English
2
15
48
6K
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
It's this time again! Let's try to recapture back some arb profits for @yieldbasis LPs. It will only work if voters will be fast enough (if not - we'll not recapture some ₿). yieldbasis.com/govern
Michael Egorov tweet media
English
6
9
56
21.3K
mimaklas me-retweet
Curve Finance
Curve Finance@CurveFinance·
A postmortem on sDOLA market liquidations by @LlamaRisk. Necessary learnings for safety of future markets have been made. The loss for the borrowers ($822k) is very feasible to compensate by Curve DAO if it approves, but is subject to discussions and a vote. The attacker profit was around $200k. While it's quite regrettable that the attack has happened, it brought valuable information before the release of a new version of LlamaLend. Likely, the attacker would have profited more if this was brought as a security report rather than an attack.
LlamaRisk@LlamaRisk

On March 2, 2026, an exploit on the sDOLA-long2 LlamaLend market hard-liquidated 27 active borrowers (~$10.9M total debt). The post-mortem linked below explains what made the exploit possible, the impact to users, and how to prevent such incidents in the future. 👇

English
9
12
93
16.3K
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
One of the worst places where you can compare different stablecoins is this site stablelens.io. Not only it favors redeemable stablecoins greatly, it also measures stablecoin prices (and, hence, stability) totally wrong when it comes to DEXes (so naturally favors just CEX liquidity). Very bad place to learn about stables. Avoid.
English
4
3
34
3.3K
mimaklas me-retweet
Michael Egorov
Michael Egorov@newmichwill·
This is interesting: @CurveFinance USDC/USDT pool greatly outperforms similar @Uniswap pools in both utilization and APR. And the average fee in the pool on Curve is actually higher than in Uni v4 pool with similar assets!
Michael Egorov tweet media
English
23
31
242
77.5K
mimaklas me-retweet
Curve Finance
Curve Finance@CurveFinance·
@PancakeSwap Indeed, better to be friends and buidl together 🚀
English
32
20
796
53.7K
mimaklas me-retweet
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🚨 JUST IN: Curve Finance says PancakeSwap copied its code without permission, calling it a license violation.
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
86
86
891
69.8K
mimaklas me-retweet
Curve Finance
Curve Finance@CurveFinance·
Dear @PancakeSwap. Looks like you copied our code without asking. It is violation of its license. Not only it is illegal: historically it showed to be unwise for those who did it this way in other regards. In any case. If you want to enjoy using stableswap without legal problems and to borrow some of our expertise to keep users SAFU - you still can contact us for licensing and collaboration.
Curve Finance tweet media
PancakeSwap@PancakeSwap

Introducing better prices for swapping stablecoins and tightly-pegged assets. StableSwap is now live on PancakeSwap Infinity ♾️ Lower slippage. Dynamic fees.

English
496
378
4.1K
866.9K