@FinnSamule62507@ChannelDogYT They literally don’t, some of the most wild takes I’ve cere heard on the podcast. You’re not some tenth percentile intellectual buddy
@d3ucedevil@ChannelDogYT They have generic Reddit takes that’s how they’re popular most podcasts are successful because of mediocrity and people just listen out of hearing things they want
1. A meteor that only degrades wood and brick hits the Earth.
2. Every human's arms all fall off.
3. Quarries and forests become sentient and fend off raw materials collection.
4. Aliens join on nature's side.
5. Yurt manufacturers form a monopoly and refuse to sell their products so that people can't even have semi-permanent structures.
5 steps. Just crazy how precarious life is.
@krbysuperstella@d3ucedevil@run_guns I've probably paid more taxes to the U.S. Federal Government and at least one state than you will ever pay in your life you brokie dipshit. Just because you're boring me enough to ignore you doesn't mean you've "shut me up".
1. I lose my job.
2. All my savings (specifically accrued over the years for this exact eventuality) are stolen out of my bank.
3. My friends immediately start to hate me.
4. My family in various places of the USA immediately start to hate me.
5. I am blacklisted from getting work even from McDonalds/Walmart.
Wow in a way, you're right, we are all only 5 incidents away from homelessness. Profound when you think about it.
@d3ucedevil@camharless@BobMurphyEcon That’s my point, if more red pushers just walk away blue has a better chance
I would say that is a more viable option than pressing either
@TrueHighKing69@camharless@BobMurphyEcon I’m not mad I’m genuinely amused by you’re stupidity, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s bait, you literally have a Epstein as your pfp🤣🤣🤣
You’re talking about risk, when that’s not the only aspect of the question. You’re thinking of the question in a way that only concerns your own safety, which is completely fine, but you’re point here has nothing to do with what I’m saying. Yes, obviously the red button still has no risk because I only changed the framing, the buttons are still the same. That was not my point at all. My point is that this framing MAKES the red button seem worse than the blue despite them still being the same, it’s a more extreme version of the framing in the actual question.
If you can not understand how this framing is misleading, and will make a large portion of individuals, including children, think that the red button is bad, then you are not as smart or logical as you think you are 🤣🤣🤣
@d3ucedevil@camharless@BobMurphyEcon Seeing this, I’m asking myself why a person would press blue ((knowing)) the risk of death. The only risk still in this framing comes from pressing the blue button and it’s not a secret to anyone. A logical person would not risk death for no reason when red is guaranteed life.
@TrueHighKing69@camharless@BobMurphyEcon No it’s not, wtf are you talking about it you’re just slow. Also there are no abstained, you have to vote. All I’m changing are the second and third sentences. Stay the fuck outta my notis 🤣
@d3ucedevil@camharless@BobMurphyEcon No you’re changing the rules. Framing is just how you say it. The functionality in your example and the OG is completely different for abstainers
@TrueHighKing69@camharless@BobMurphyEcon Obviously I have the same parameters of a button needing to be pressed retard. I’m just changing how the buttons are framed, stop trying to argue in bad faith
@d3ucedevil@camharless@BobMurphyEcon In your scenario, babies who don’t press a button or don’t die since they don’t press blue.
In the real one they’ll die since they failed to press red.