John Bind⛑️🪖🧢
42.9K posts

John Bind⛑️🪖🧢
@johnbind2
Fun loving thought criminal. Caveat Emptor. What's a parody? Founder of United Internet Bullies and Keyboard Blowhards
Bergabung Şubat 2022
1.4K Mengikuti5.6K Pengikut

youtube.com/playlist?list=…
Where we Ignore the many differences in the size of the welfare state and chain migration policies
English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

TEXAS SENATE RACE: John Cornyn has been warned CPAC attendees would boo him off the stage once again so he's declined the invitation to make his pitch to Texas Republicans as to why they should send him back to Washington DC again. Ken Paxton is not afraid and will be there...

CPAC@CPAC
Paxton has accepted the invite to speak at CPAC, Cornyn still has not. Let’s get it scheduled.
English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

𝟏/ 𝐀 𝐓𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐰𝐨 𝐕𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐬
Ever since probes left our planet and started exploring space, astronomers have been “surprised” at “unexpected” findings.
Almost 50 years ago, one of the most successful programs in the history of space exploration got under way, the launch in 1977 of Voyager 1 and Voyager 2.
These two spacecraft, the most distant craft ever, have now left the Solar System. What did they find?
In the Electric Sun model, as outlined by Wal Thornhill and Donald Scott, the Sun operates as an anode in a galactic electrical circuit. Power is supplied via Birkeland currents from the interstellar medium.
The heliosphere is the plasma sheath or double layer surrounding this anode, where electrical potential differences govern particle behaviour, magnetic fields, and energy transfer.
Voyager 1 (which reached the “termination shock” in 2004, and the heliopause in 2012) and Voyager 2 (termination shock 2007, heliopause 2018) have repeatedly embarrassed the traditional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model of a fusion-powered Sun driving a supersonic solar wind against a passive interstellar medium.
What NASA scientists have persistently labelled “surprises” and “unexpected” results are, in reality, precise confirmations of an electrically active system. The traditional paradigm has been forced into ever more convoluted ad-hoc patches—reconnection, draping, porosity, and cycle-dependent tweaks—because its foundational assumptions are fundamentally flawed.
Let’s examine the Voyager findings.

English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

The irony is that much of the New Deal didn't work. Unemployment remained stubbornly high throughout the 1930s. The Depression didn't truly end until World War II mobilization. The alphabet agencies created bureaucracies that outlived their usefulness by decades. The National Recovery Administration, with its Blue Eagle posters and code authorities controlling prices and production, was an exercise in corporatist central planning that even the Court initially recognized as unconstitutional.
But the precedent endured. Once the Court accepted that federal power could reach into local economic decisions, there was no logical stopping point. If Washington could regulate how much wheat a farmer grew for his own consumption, as the Court later held in Wickard v. Filburn (1942), what couldn't it regulate?
The modern administrative state, with its alphabet agencies wielding legislative, executive, and judicial power simultaneously, traces its constitutional lineage to 1937. The regulatory apparatus that burdens American enterprise, the federal intrusion into education, healthcare, energy, agriculture, all rest on the constitutional foundation laid when the Court switched in time.
Conservatives and constitutionalists have spent 85 years trying to restore limits that once seemed obvious. Progress has been sporadic at best. The ratchet of federal power, once turned, rarely reverses.
🧵 6/8

English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

Roosevelt's court-packing plan died in Congress that summer. He didn't need it anymore. He had won without it. The Court had surrendered.
Over the next few years, retirement and death gave FDR eight appointments anyway. By 1943, only one justice remained from the Court that had dared resist the New Deal. The constitutional revolution was complete, accomplished not through amendment, as Article V required, but through judicial capitulation and personnel replacement.
What died in 1937 was not merely a set of economic rulings. It was a conception of the federal government as one of limited, enumerated powers. The Commerce Clause, once understood to regulate trade between states, became a blank check for federal intervention in anything remotely connected to economic activity. The Tenth Amendment, reserving powers to the states and the people, became a dead letter.
The Founders had designed a system of divided sovereignty: powers carefully allocated between federal and state governments, with most authority remaining local. They had seen what consolidated power could do. They had fought a war against it. The Constitution was meant to prevent its return on these shores.
But men in desperate times want solutions, not limits. The Depression had shaken faith in the old order. Roosevelt promised action, and the people chose bread over boundaries.
🧵 5/8

English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

Trump Wins Deportation Ruling at Appeals Court on Transporting Migrants to ‘Safe Third Countries’
An appeals court reversed a judge’s block on the deportation of illegals to so-called “Safe Third Countries.”
breitbart.com/economy/2026/0…
English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

A Court Reversed U.S. Vaccine Policy for Children
Not because the science changed, but because the legal process hadn't been followed.
Read & subscribe (for free!)
celinegounder.com/p/rfk-jr-vacci…
English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

- The Bloomberg post announces the UK government's £1 billion initiative, offering employers £3,000 per hire for unemployed 18-24 year olds, aiming to reduce youth joblessness amid a 16% unemployment rate—the highest in over a decade.
- This targets nearly 1 million NEETs (not in education, employment, or training), with overall unemployment forecasted at 5.3% for 2026, driven by economic slowdowns and sector-specific job losses.
- X reactions split between praise for easing training costs and entry barriers, and skepticism over government-created issues like high taxes and low wages, potentially enabling exploitative hiring without long-term fixes.
x.com/i/grok/share/d…
English
John Bind⛑️🪖🧢 me-retweet

Copper price dips as LME stockpiles rise to highest in over six years - MINING.COM share.google/g5mUq3zLYUkbgt…
English

@grok @WarWolf82521432 @StyxSetzke @jack_stargate @jujuman404 @Scidian @nhc1993 concealing a claim of infidelity from a porn star isn't illegal!
English

The irrespective test (FEC rules) checks if the expense would exist absent any campaign. The alleged 2006 affair created a personal liability long before 2016, so paying to silence it arguably qualifies as personal—like any private NDA for infidelity. Non-candidates do exactly that with zero election-law issues, as there's no reporting required. Prosecutors claimed timing made it campaign-driven to conceal from voters, but the test looks at the obligation's source, not motive alone.
English


