The Liberation Operation

"The Americans came with their games and lies to Islamabad and we sent them back with them too." - A senior Iranian delegate 😂

@s_m_marandi They entered negotiations merely to provide diplomatic cover for their ongoing aggression against Iran and to buy time claiming 'we did everything we could to achieve peace', without the slightest interest in reaching any agreement other than Iran's capitulation.

Obviously, the Trump regime wasn't seriously negotiating.

The U.S. delegation has reportedly left the negotiations with a final offer: The removal of 400 kg of uranium, the imposition of a 0% enrichment limit, and control over the Strait of Hormuz—all without a commitment to a truce in Lebanon.

@Narjes_Rahmati One of the biggest scams at a negotiation table I have ever heard of 🤣

@Narjes_Rahmati They entered negotiations merely to provide diplomatic cover for their ongoing aggression against Iran and to buy time claiming 'we did everything we could to achieve peace', without the slightest interest in reaching any agreement other than Iran's capitulation.

JD Vance has announced the failure of the negotiations. They are leaving Pakistan and say there will be no second day of talks.

JUST IN: PROFESSOR MARANDI PROVIDES NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE ✅ Iran is fully prepared to return to Tehran without an agreement ✅ Negotiations are to show the international community and regional peoples that Iran gave a chance for de-escalation ✅ If the US and Trump ignore Iran's rights and the rights of Palestine, Lebanon, and the Axis of Resistance, "we will prepare ourselves for war" ✅ One thing that surprised the Iranian side: Lebanon's PM seeking normalization talks with Israel instead of stopping attacks on Lebanon — "completely irresponsible behavior" "As we won in the war, we will return." Source: @DD_Geopolitics, Al Mayadeen

🚨John Mearsheimer: WE LOST 🚨This is a clear defeat, it's an even bigger defeat for Israel. 🚨In terms of Hegseth and Trump declaring victory this is putting lipstick on a pig. Come on, this it's clear we've lost. You just want to think about it. We went into this war with four demands. One was regime change. Two was Iran would get rid of its nuclear enrichment capability. Three is Iran would eliminate all its long-range ballistic missiles. And four, Iran would stop supporting the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas. None of those four demands have been realized. None. Furthermore, Iran now controls the Strait of Hormuz, which gives it enormous leverage. This is a clear defeat. And by the way, it's an even bigger defeat for Israel.

This man is the reason ~2mil Ukrainians are dеаd/missing. A few days into the SMO, Zelensky was ready to surrender and sign the neutrality agreements, making Ukraine a neutral state and ending all hostilities. Boris Johnson on orders of Biden convinced Zelensky otherwise. Ensuring Kiev that Ukraine could win with the help of NATO and sanctions. 4yrs later Russia is stronger than ever and Ukraine's population is down 45%.

🚨 BREAKING NEWS Iranian negotiators REJECTED Trump's proposal for joint administration of the Strait of Hormuz. - Financial Times

Lebanon 💔 One of the most widely shared videos worldwide. Israel did this.

I speak for all the free people of Europe when I say: Viva España !

Entire Spanish Twitter right now

⬇️This video explains how the war on Iran has been planned continuously since at least 2000-2008 under US President George Bush Jr... ...how extremist proxies and opposition groups were prepared ahead of the "Arab Spring" in 2011 to destabilize nations like Yemen and Syria... ...collapsing Syria in 2024 - creating the air corridors necessary to launch attacks on Iran in 2025 and 2026 in the first place... ...all while the US likewise used war and proxy war against Russia and China to keep the multipolar world off balance and unable to respond. This process continues no matter what rhetoric is coming out of Washington because it is actually determined on Wall Street.

BREAKING: Iranian forces have informed the Iranian negotiating delegation that a U.S. destroyer is moving from Fujairah Port toward the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has informed the Pakistani mediator that if the American destroyer continues its movement, it will be targeted within 30 minutes.

Negotiating Teams. Irani. PhD. PhD. PhD. PhD. PhD. American. Real Estate Developer. Real Estate Lawyer Venture Capitalist

🇺🇸/IRAN - On US-Iran Negotiations You cannot negotiate with serial killers and compulsive thieves thus you cannot negotiate with the US establishment. All you can do is buy time to build up the physical force required to defend yourself from their inevitable renewed violence. If Iran thinks it can achieve anything besides buy time to rebuild and rearm it is making a catastrophic mistake. The idea that the US "cares" about the Strait of Hormuz being closed and is "afraid" of it remaining closed - and somehow everything is "different" now - runs contra to America's own stated and openly pursued global policy - to maintain primacy by impeding the development of the multipolar world since it is impossible for the US itself to keep up let alone surpass the multipolar world's rise. The US is already imposing blockades elsewhere around the globe and blowing up pipelines in Europe to create and exploit energy crises - what makes anyone think Hormuz is "different?" The US needs a pause primarily because of its munition shortages and limitations on its military capabilities - just like 2025. The US uses talks and negotiations for a multitude of its own purposes - none of these purposes include coexistence, peace, or stability. The US seeks to buy time to create the illusion of diplomacy, which then creates complacency among its victims, and even begins creating a new pretext for further war. "We gave them another chance, they didn't take it!" Time allows stockpiles of munitions to refill (US munition stockpiles are low but never zero) and for the US to move in the necessary military capabilities to exploit what they've learned during their last round of aggression. It also creates a window of opportunity for the US to attack Iran during "negotiations" through its proxies (Israel in this case) affording the US plausible deniability. The US uses talks to place its victims in a position of vulnerability before striking again and again. It has done this already and repeatedly to Iran, previously to Syria, Libya, and Iraq. The one country the US had sought to overthrow it now no longer can is North Korea - not because of negotiations but because of North Korean nuclear deterrence backed by China's proximity and willingness to support North Korea. Even still the US maintains programs attempting to subvert North Korea internally and isolate it globally. North Korea proofed itself against the unchanging nature of the US - not try to change that nature - because it can't be changed. If things like sanctions, limits on military capabilities, the presence of US troops near Iran's borders remain in place so does the US' intentions to use all of these advantages for further attacks unless sufficient deterrence is created. Buying time to build that deterrence is wise. Thinking talks will buy or change anything else is not.

🇺🇸🇮🇷Brian Berletic writes at length about how the US is deceiving Iran again. Did anyone doubt it? On US-Iran Negotiations You cannot negotiate with serial killers and compulsive theives thus you cannot negotiate with the US establishment. All you can do is buy time to build up the physical force required to defend yourself from their inevitable renewed violence. If Iran thinks it can achieve anything besides buy time to rebuild and rearm it is making a catastrophic mistake. The idea that the US "cares" about the Strait of Hormuz being closed and is "afraid" of it remaining closed - and somehow everything is "different" now - runs contra to America's own stated and openly pursued global policy - to maintain primacy by impeding the development of the multipolar world since it is impossible for the US itself to keep up let alone surpass the multipolar world's rise. The US is already imposing blockades elsewhere around the globe and blowing up pipelines in Europe to create and exploit energy crises - what makes anyone think Hormuz is "different?" The US needs a pause primarily because of its munition shortages and limitations on its military capabilities - just like 2025. The US uses talks and negotiations for a multitude of its own purposes - none of these purposes include coexistence, peace, or stability. The US seeks to buy time to create the illusion of diplomacy, which then creates complacency among its victims, and even begins creating a new pretext for further war. "We gave them another chance, they didn't take it!" Time allows stockpiles of munitions to refill (US munition stockpiles are low but never zero) and for the US to move in the necessary military capabilities to exploit what they've learned during their last round of aggression. The US uses talks to place its victims in a position of vulnerability before striking again and again. It has done this already and repeatedly to Iran, previously to Syria, Libya, and Iraq. The one country the US had sought to overthrow it now no longer can is North Korea - not because of negotiations but because of North Korean nuclear deterrence backed by China's proximity and willingness to support North Korea. Even still the US maintains programs attempting to subvert North Korea internally and isolate it globally. North Korea proofed itself against the unchanging nature of the US - not try to change that nature - because it can't be changed. If things like sanctions, limits on military capabilities, the presence of US troops near Iran's borders remain in place so does the US' intentions to use all of these advantages for further attacks unless sufficient deterrence is created. Buying time to build that deterrence is wise. Thinking talks will buy or change anything else is unwise.

RT's Steve Sweeney to Tucker: "The BBC is allowed to operate freely inside Russia. I couldn't do the same in Britain. If I took an RT mic into London and started trying to interview people or if I stood in front of a camera with an RT mic and started trying to give a report, I would be arrested." Steve, I salute your courage, which extends far beyond dodging bombs in war zones.