Tweet Disematkan
Phelá
727 posts

Phelá me-retweet
Phelá me-retweet
Phelá me-retweet

.@BlaqBonez PUSSY
PRE-ACTION NOTICE DEY DIFFERENT FROM TAKING PERSON TO COURT
YOU MUST TAKE ME TO COURT
MOTHERFUCKING BASTARD
NA SEXUAL ABUSER YOU BE.
YOU WAN DEY SAVE FACE WITH ONE STUPID 2BILLION DOCUMENT WEY YOU NO FIT POST WITH YOUR ACCOUNT CAUSE YOU ARE GUILTY
YOU DID IT.
NO BE DEFAMATION.
YOU ARE A SEXUAL ABUSER.
English

.@BlaqBonez BEFORE ME YOU NO DEY CARRY BOUNCER
NOW EVERYWHERE YOU GO YOU DEY CARRY BOUNCER
I MADE SURE OF THAT
BECAUSE YOU MADE THE VICTIM CARRY BOUNCER
NO WORRY. THE WORLD GO SOON KNOW YOUR TALES.
TOXIC, NARCISSISTIC,SEXUAL ABUSING BULLY.
I GO BULLY YOU TILL YOU DIE.
PUSSY.
English
Phelá me-retweet
Phelá me-retweet

Phelá me-retweet
Phelá me-retweet
Phelá me-retweet

The guy said we have Peller culture. If you walk into the home of a farmer who built a successful agricultural business, employs hundreds of people, owns thousands of hectares, and created wealth through skills that clearly work in the real world, what exactly are you trying to achieve by calling him “olodo”?
He never claimed to be a mathematician, a philosopher, or a theoretical physicist. He succeeded in the domain he chose.
If he responds by saying, “I’ve built a successful life,” or “I’m wealthier than you,” that isn’t changing the subject. He’s rejecting your assumption that your preferred metric is the only one that matters.
The person saying “olodo” has already decided that intellectual ability is the standard everyone should be judged by. The other person is simply rejecting that premise.
Calling someone “olodo” because they don’t excel in the area you personally value says more about your hierarchy than it does about them.
CZAR@callhimCZAR
@0xkitng Well the conversation was about intellect not finances. OLODO is the keyword. Not broke or poor. So if your response as a person when they are pointing out an intellectual defect is to run to your finances as cover, you are proving them right.
English
Phelá me-retweet
Phelá me-retweet

I’m sorry but to point out that your comment was an analysis of people’s reasoning from MY COMMENTS from an interview and then say they CAN be examined INDEPENDENTLY of the said INTERVIEW, therein lies the disconnect.
Plus, a farmer that has built a successful business in agriculture, is in by no metric an “olodo” whether he’s called one or not.
Also, my comments on the “olodo uprising” and “Peller culture” were entirely independent of each other.
Whenever you have the chance to maybe check out the interview. Your thoughts after then would also be appreciated
English
Phelá me-retweet












