vanurninho ☧

24.9K posts

vanurninho ☧ banner
vanurninho ☧

vanurninho ☧

@vanurninus

Stat Crux dum volvitur orbis

Bergabung Ağustos 2023
516 Mengikuti162 Pengikut
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
Arty the Art Historian
Arty the Art Historian@ArtyArtHistory·
Master of the Hours of Henry II
Arty the Art Historian tweet media
English
0
26
210
2.7K
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
Annibale
Annibale@Annibal97783312·
I feel compelled to return to this argument once more to dispel what I believe is a significant myth regarding Pope Leo XIV. Compared with all other 12 popes of the post-1870 era, beginning with his namesake Leo XIII, the current Pope is far from a political or even religious 'left-wing extremist'. If you do not believe me, believe their written records. Benedict XV, the pope who denounced Socialism as 'the enemy of the Church', also instituted the International Catholic Day for Migrants and Refugees, consistently condemned the First World War from the moment of his election, and coined the famous definition of WWI as 'the useless slaughter' in his international exhortation to all belligerent sides of 1st August 1917. Pius X, recognised as the foremost anti-modernist and intransigent conservative among modern popes, condemned Italy's exploitation of religion in the war against Turkey, and wrote the encyclical Lacrimabili Statu denouncing the violent mistreatment of South American indigenous populations by their governments. Pius XI, a deeply underrated figure, whilst bitterly opposing communism and socialism, openly attacked Nazi racial ideology in Mit Brennender Sorge , and at his personal request the Congregation for Seminaries and Universities issued on 13th April 1938 the Syllabus against Racism , distributed to Catholic schools worldwide, the timing of which, falling precisely during Hitler's state visit to Rome, was hardly accidental. He also opposed rearmament and war consistently. All this notwithstanding the fact that Pius XI personally harboured traditional Catholic prejudices and had initially sought an accommodation with Hitler upon his coming to power in 1933. Pius XII remains perhaps the most problematic of recent popes, owing to his failure to condemn Nazism and the Holocaust with sufficient strength and clarity — a failing serious enough to halt and restart his canonisation process on several occasions. And yet even he consistently condemned war and the concept of armed aggression. And one need hardly dwell on John XXIII ; Mater et Magistra on workers' rights and social justice, Pacem in Terris on the repudiation of war, or on John Paul II. Even Paul VI, a reserved, traditional and extraordinarily cautious figure, penned "Populorum Progressio", acknowledging the right of poor nations to development and emancipation, and explicitly condemning the concept of private property as an unconditional right when others lack bare necessities. So there is nothing extreme in what Leo XIV has said over the past few days. It is, once again, the continuation of Catholic doctrine as it has evolved over the past two centuries. What has changed is not the Church. It is the world around it that has shifted so far in one direction that the mere desire for peace, the condemnation of violence and abuse, and the refusal to allow religion to be exploited for political ends are now labelled 'dangerous extremism'.
English
9
71
301
17.5K
vanurninho ☧
vanurninho ☧@vanurninus·
@matheuszome @ivanildoiii Então esqueça os Estados Unidos. Lá tem essa mesma conversa de falta de representatividade por parte dos estados mais populosos.
Português
0
0
1
39
Matheus Zomé
Matheus Zomé@matheuszome·
Como dizia Everardo Backheuser, federalismo só funciona em países cujas UFs sejam "equipotentes". Basta ver como são as UFs dos EUA, Suíça, etc. Um Amazonas e um Sergipe lado a lado não podem virar federação. Para ser uma federação, o Brasil teria que redesenhar inteiramente seu mapa político, com UFs equipotentes - isso inclui dividir algumas (Guanabara pode entrar aí) e juntar outras (o Nordeste mesmo tem que ser totalmente redesenhado, com várias fusões e agregações). (Backheuser faz umas propostas interessantes em "Problemas do Brasil", mas isso 90 anos atrás.)
Português
1
0
22
498
Ivanildo Terceiro 🔸🌐
Eu acho difícil ter qualquer federalismo enquanto Norte e Nordeste mandarem a maioria dos senadores mesmo morando muito menos gente por lá. O Sudeste concentra 44% da população e manda 12 senadores de 81. A desproporção também ocorre no número de deputados. A pior parte é que a correção disso jamais vai passar no Congresso. Por que destruiriam o sistema que os beneficia? Só existe uma solução. Tem que dividir SP em três estados. Fazer a Guanabara voltar a ter três senadores. Enfim, dá pra fazer ocorrer. Nem que seja temporariamente só pra isso.
Português
55
21
350
11.4K
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
💜Lara Nibiru💜
💜Lara Nibiru💜@DiaNibiru·
Creatures from Brazilian mythology - Headless Mule (but male) - Boitata
💜Lara Nibiru💜 tweet media
English
53
1.1K
9.1K
58.2K
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
British Catholic Aesthetics
Newman University Church, located in Dublin, Ireland. Consecrated in 1856.
British Catholic Aesthetics tweet mediaBritish Catholic Aesthetics tweet mediaBritish Catholic Aesthetics tweet mediaBritish Catholic Aesthetics tweet media
English
2
15
233
3.4K
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
Art Encyclopedia
Art Encyclopedia@artenpedia·
Hilma af Klint, 1915-1917
Art Encyclopedia tweet media
Nederlands
1
362
1.8K
34.6K
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
Nina Antonia
Nina Antonia@NinaAntonia13·
A rare instance of appreciating an artist, Gottfried Kumpf (1920-2022) for his name as much as his work. In his lifetime, Kumpf's paintings were considered naive but since his death, they are becoming increasingly desirable.
Nina Antonia tweet media
English
12
219
1.7K
30.6K
vanurninho ☧
vanurninho ☧@vanurninus·
só aparece post l*terano agr na minha for you, pelo amor hein
Português
0
0
1
12
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
Arty the Art Historian
Arty the Art Historian@ArtyArtHistory·
Lamentation Over the Dead Christ by Niccolò dell'Arca, 1463
Arty the Art Historian tweet mediaArty the Art Historian tweet mediaArty the Art Historian tweet media
Italiano
1
48
399
8.6K
vanurninho ☧
vanurninho ☧@vanurninus·
meu brasil brasileiro
Português
0
0
1
8
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
y.o.t. 🇻🇦
y.o.t. 🇻🇦@_y_o_t·
Mum (GOARCH) and dad (ROCOR) are divorced but it's okay because the kids (the laity) can still go to their separate houses without issues. The family is totally united though btw
𝙷𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚖𝚊𝚗@shagbark_hick

I can't understand why the EO's make a big joke about the "which Orthodox Church?" question. If you ask 5 GOARCH Priests if ROCOR can receive Communion at their Churches, and 5 ROCOR Priests whether GOARCH can receive at their Churches, you will get ten different answers. If that's the one, singular, unified "Church," I'm confused. Is the sole basis of unity opposing the Bishop of Rome and doing the Divine Liturgy of St John Chrysostom (or Divine Liturgy of St Basil)? Can "unity" mean "we may disagree on something as fundamental as divorce, and we cannot receive Communion at each others' Churches?" Is just doing the same Liturgy enough? Of course even with the Liturgy, the Russians have added some things to their Liturgy, the Greeks have shortened theirs, and many of the Churches disagree on which calendar to use. At times, they seem to squabble even about this. The unity they have even there is tenuous. So the sole unifier within Eastern Orthodoxy appears to be "opposing the Bishop of Rome." Which even many early Church fathers, such as St Irenaeus of Lyons, explicitly disagreed with. From this, are we to understand that the unifying element of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church consists of assenting to anti-Roman arguments that developed many centuries later? But if that development came later, why do so many EO oppose Rome because we've done "development of doctrine?" Why oppose development of doctrine in our case, but not in your own? It seems to me that understanding this very strange form of "unity" requires almost limitless degrees of intensive study, or it requires more or less not caring about the question. And if you ask these questions to the EO types online, they are far more likely to call you a retard than they are to offer a serious, helpful answer. They consider you hopelessly stupid for even asking. Offline, I find the vast majority of converts haven't really thought these kinds of questions through -- they mostly came for the aesthetics and the (very!) friendly parishioners. Exhaustion with both the vagueness and the cagey attitude of many apologists was a large contributor to my leaving the EO catechumenate and returning to Rome.

English
3
6
81
2.3K
vanurninho ☧ me-retweet
Miroslav
Miroslav@Yagnilo·
What is your favorite Novus ordo mitre? I really like this one
Miroslav tweet media
English
9
6
128
7.1K