0fun

@ZenomTrader you are sharing too much, please give us time to milk it 🤑

I shared my exact framework to get $300k+ in payouts in a 7 phase program. A full mini course created by Claude Opus 4.7 Doppelganger. At no extra cost for Premium. Based on 2 months of me answering questions and scraping tens of thousands of messages. Along with 16 strategies across 4 platforms 2 autonomous AI backtesting tools, A journal where you can test your strategy portfolios under the prop firm business model, add expenses and rewards, and build portfolios. Still, some coding skills and domain specific knowledge are required!!!!! It’s not very beginner friendly, you have to use agents to make use of it.

@ZenomTrader Yeah it's weird that they don't publish these statistics. This is something that FTMO should actively promote... "Prime status requires four reward withdrawals on a single account—each with a minimum 4% profit—alongside a clean four-month trading record."

#1 Verified FTMO Prime Trader from Romania Huge milestone. I’ve been digging into it, and there appear to be only 3–4 verified FTMO Prime traders globally. Getting payouts is the easy part maintaining them consistently over a long period is much harder. That’s where the real difference shows: Systematic traders running robust, profitable strategies vs. account flippers gamifying prop firms. Probably top 0.0001%.

@ZenomTrader ♥️ group is happy 😎

My new autonomous NT8 backtesting tool is fully done. 15–30x faster than the previous version. Built entirely with Claude Code. The code is now on Github The reason I haven’t released it yet: A tech company offered me a deal to turn these tools into a business. I chose the premium in the end. That’s it, with all the hate I got, I still chose the group. It has more potential in the long run.

@ZenomTrader should be $300/month + % of profit split! some people are clueless, we don't need them in the group... 🧐

Time to increase the price. With the volume and amount of code we've been posting, I think it's really time. Everyone who’s currently in will be grandfathered at the current price on rebilling, confirmed by Whop’s support. The new price will be $150 monthly and $350 quarterly. I’m already selling a Ferrari for the price of an Uber ride To share 20+ strategies and so many tools for 80 bucks. But we found the solution. It will take a while to implement it, but at least I don’t have to share the code anymore.

@Hapoentje @Disposition96 @ZenomTrader why does someone need to re-explain for every level of "i am a beginner"? if something is not clear, just copy-paste this conversation into any AI chatbot with the context and code 🤷‍♂️

@Disposition96 @ZenomTrader Yup, I share the same. I’m a beginner, but labeling it ‘advanced only’ feels like a cop-out. You don’t need a full course, but just a few lines of context per strategy. What’s the logic? What conditions does it work in? Without that, it’s just code sitting there.

This message contains no content. The AI has nothing to say.

@ZenomTrader and why wre prop firms not banning you yet? or is it a phase where they want to attract algorithmic traders and then they change the rules to filter out the profitable ones who are milking the system?

Crazy how compounding from trading and mastering autonomous agents looks. This quarter alone when I finally hit scaling I've made more in prop firm payouts than in the previous two years combined. $105,000 in 3 months. 2024 and 2025 combined: $96,000. I can't even scale properly because of the tax system in a decaying country And I still beat both years in 90 days. Nobody in the industry is showing the full equity curve with all expenses and payouts included. Prove me wrong!

@ZenomTrader see you on the inside 🤝

My Personal Meta EA Is Not For Sale Some of you saw my Personal Meta EA post and expect the code to drop inside the $80/month community. No. I already shared strategies worth $10,000+ at the price of $80. The best prop firm journal ever created in the history of the industry: 500,000 lines of code, 1 month of work, 5 autonomous agents building it simultaneously. A prop simulator that nobody else has. an NT8/MT5 Bridge that codes, compiles, and backtests on its own. All of that for $80. But my Personal Meta EA is not an $80 product. It's not a $1,000 product. it's not even a $10,000 product. 12 strategies. Sharpe 2.2+. mean reversion + trend following + breakout. 20,000 lines of logic compressed into 4,000 lines of clean code. No overlapping. No hedging. Every regime covered. And it's still growing: more strategies, more instruments, more edge. I wouldn't wake up from bed for less than $250,000. and even at that price i'd think twice. What you get for $80 is the framework. The architecture. The methodology. The tools to build YOUR version. What you don't get is mine. Because mine has my imagination in it: and that's not for sale at any premium tier. I've given this community more value than any trading service in existence. But expecting my Personal edge for the price of a dinner is crazy. Build your own. I gave you everything you need to do it.

it's not intelligence, it's automation

@ZenomTrader your fight with the whole world is your fight with yourself

I'm tired of watching people with zero verified results sit at the top of this industry Tori and every other guru out there has one thing in common: not a single one of them will post a full equity curve over 2+ years. Not one. Because the moment they do, basic probability theory proves them wrong Meanwhile i'm sitting here with 41% CAGR, 14.87% max drawdown, verified with private investor capital on Darwinex, and somehow the industry rewards the guy drawing lines on a chart over the guy who can actually prove it with math The industry is corrupt the same way the elites are corrupt the people at the top aren't there because they're the best. They're there because nobody held them accountable So here's what i'm doing about it. I'll publish my full track record side by side with anyone who claims to be profitable. Anyone. Post your equity curve, i'll post mine. Let the math decide The era of unverified gurus ruling this industry is ending. Not because they'll stop but because verified traders will overshadow them. By any means necessary Who's in? Show me your equity curve. I'll wait.

@ZenomTrader @M_Ann_C_hilist it's a personality configuration. 99% likelihood he is an outlier, a neurodivergent profile. "normal" people don't do this, they plug into social systems and survive through manipulation in implicit contexts and politics... (birds of feather, i speak from personal experience)...

@M_Ann_C_hilist You need to be a psychopath, hypnotized by gaining more knowledge and understanding. It’s not the only way to do it, you have to hate the industry as it is right now and want to change it, to shape it according to your own values.

Nobody in the history of prop firm trading has built what i built in 6 weeks with autonomous agents. Over 1,000,000 lines of code across 17 projects. Zero lines written manually. Claude Code and Codex did everything. I described what i wanted and the agents coded, compiled, debugged and deployed it while i was sleeping, eating, running, buying an apartment. The full list is insane and i still can't believe it. A trading dashboard that destroys every commercial tool in the industry. Prop firm simulator, hedge detection engine, correlation matrices, multi-portfolio simulation across firms, payout certificates. Built by one person from Romania in his apartment. Two autonomous backtesting bridges. NinjaTrader 8 and MetaTrader 5 running in parallel. They compile, debug, and backtest without me touching a single button. i wake up to new equity curves. A Meta EA with 12 strategies. Gold, Nasdaq, USDJPY, Bitcoin. Mean reversion, trend following, breakout.All running simultaneously in one script. Sharpe 2.17. a full hedge fund in a single file. An AI clone of myself answering support tickets on my premium community 24/7 in my exact voice. Trained on everything i ever said. it speaks every language and never sleeps. Voice control from anywhere in my apartment. Screenshot automation in 0.1ms. A phone bridge so i control my entire infrastructure from my pocket. A tweet engine scoring virality. 5 custom AI tools i designed from scratch. 9,000 in prop firm fees turned into 130,000+ in payouts in the last 6 months. 41% CAGR verified with private investor capital. 74 premium members at 80/month. Show me one person who did more in 6 weeks. I will wait.

@ZenomTrader dude, with such stats, why bother with prop firms at all? i understand the math, but realistically, 2-3M funding is a limit and that's worse than ≈200K personal fund without any limitations...

The gap between having a framework and actually deploying it is where 99% of traders get destroyed. I haven't bought a prop firm challenge in months. Been building the most advanced trading infrastructure in the industry instead. Autonomous backtesting pipelines, prop firm simulators, hedge detection engines, a Meta EA with 12 strategies, portfolio analytics nobody else has. 300,000+ lines of code. Meanwhile the community exploded. 51 to 74 members in 6 days. 30+ people using agents to build and deploy strategies. Verified track records coming in. This thing is turning into something that doesn't exist anywhere else. But infrastructure without deployment is just a science project. The framework works. 41% CAGR, 14.87% max drawdown, verified with private investor capital. Mow it's time to do the boring part. Buy challenges. Adapt to FTMO's new rules. Organize portfolios across firms. Deploy at scale. Most influencers would never admit their portfolio needs work. They'd post the payout screenshots and hide the gaps. I'm telling you straight up i've been so focused on building that i forgot to trade. The machine is built. Now i turn it on. This is what separates builders from gamblers. gamblers never stop trading. Builders stop to build the system first. Then they deploy it and never look back.

@ZenomTrader prop firms start looking like diminishing returns: maintenance cost and rule changes outweigh the actual upside once you're above 20K personal risk capital on a CFD account with 500x leverage. below 10K personal capital is a different story, i concur. futures have different math.

100,000 $ + in total FTMO payouts and refunds. 430 $ spent in the last 6 months. Do the math on that ROI. And they just moved me from swing to standard. If you hold over news, banned. If you hold over the weekend, banned. One early close on a holiday and it's done. Your account is gone before the market even had a chance to move against you. I'm still solving this inside the Meta EA. The problem is more complicated than i thought. Most trading days are news days. I can block them entirely but then you're barely trading. Errors can happen. One missed news filter and your account is gone. Holidays, early closes, half days nobody warns you about. The edge for holding overnight is even bigger than intraday, which makes this worth solving. But it's not mathematically impossible. It's a constraint satisfaction problem. Claude Code and autonomous agents are working through every edge case right now. News calendars, holiday schedules, early close detection, weekend cutoffs. 20,000+ lines of code handling what used to require a compliance team. This is what people don't understand about prop firms. They keep adding rules because algo traders have a real quantifiable edge. Manual traders blow themselves up for free. We actually pose a threat to their business model. So they add rule after rule until the compliance burden destroy you before the market does. But every new constraint is a filter that destroy 99% of the competition. The ones who can't code their way through it quit. The ones who adapt eat everything. The Meta EA framework i built was designed to absorb rule changes without rebuilding from scratch. Last time they changed the rules, i adapted in 15 minutes. This one takes longer, but the architecture holds. mean reversion + trend following + breakout, all running simultaneously, all prop firm compliant. That's what a real system looks like. Not one strategy that dies when the firm updates their terms of service. This is game theory at its finest. The rules changed, the game changed, but the framework already accounted for it. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this with autonomous agents right now. If you can't adapt to this, the gap will eat you alive. We still adapt. We always adapt.

i can buy myself tokens, run my code in sandbox...

Clarity does not override comfort. Meta-awareness does not obligate others to go meta with you. And refusal does not mean they failed to understand you. It often means they understood enough to decide they don’t want involvement.

most hardworking? smartest? just be the happiest person in the room!

sorry about your luck

less is more because everything is nothing

it's just money, it's not real

you're here to serve