Chris Alcoma

@dunkeldeutsch_x I don’t think the purpose of the film is to endorse the character. But to state that if the government and citizens don’t act to fix the problem, it will lead to vigilante violence which is not good for society

Das ist eine der Szenen, die Citizen Vigilance komplett ruiniert: Sanders tötet eine unschuldige Person, einfach um die Dummheit ihrer Gesetzestreue zu demonstrieren. In diesem Moment ist er nicht besser als all jene, die er völlig zu Recht umbringt.

@GarethDavies007 No government is going to endorse a film promoting vigilantism. But they also shouldn’t ban the film

It’s such an important film Because it deals with the brutal reality of immigration that we’ve been forbidden to talk about Elon’s promoting it which will lead Trump & Vance to realise we do NOT have free speech in U.K. & Germany as both governments have not endorsed the film

@Sabine_Damke @Stefan_J_aus_L @VceOfReason There’s a reason, just not a virtuous one

@Stefan_J_aus_L @VceOfReason Das SWAT-Team und der Fahrer des gelben Autos….was ist mit denen?

Ich muss meine Filmkritik zu „Citizen Vigilante“ von heute Morgen noch einmal korrigieren: Ich habe jetzt zig Kommentare gelesen, in denen Linke die Zensur rechtfertigen, indem sie die von dem Hauptcharakter grundlos ermordeten Personen aufzählen. (Selbstverständlich wird Selbstjustiz hier nicht verherrlicht, vor ihr wird durch das Versagen der Judikative sogar gewarnt.) Genau das haben sie nach islamistischen Terroranschlägen auf Weihnachtsmärkte, Bataclan und die unzähligen anderen Veranstaltungen allerdings nicht ein einziges Mal getan; die Opfer schienen für sie gar nicht zu existieren. Wenn ich mit meiner Interpretation richtig liege und Boll genau diese Doppelmoral aufzeigen will, ist die Grundidee des Films eigentlich sogar ziemlich genial, auch wenn die Umsetzung -wie gesagt- eher mäßig gelungen ist.

People are saying Citizen Vigilante is graphic and a call for violence. I honestly think it was more a warning for governments around the world. Good men won’t keep standing by as their women and children are raped. As they watch the rapists go free. As they watch their homeland get destroyed. All why the government does nothing to stop it. I don’t see it as a call for violence, I see it as a wake up call.

@realRick_AUS You don’t have to like Karl and the things he has said and done in the past. But this attack on free speech is an attack on everybody and it must be condemned. Australia is tripling down on censorship and controlling what we are allowed to see and hear

I’ve seen people lose their entire livelihoods and have never recovered because of people like Karl. Karl advocated for anyone who wasn’t vaccinated to lose all their rights. (He openly stated this on tv) He called them names and mocked them on live tv in front of millions, more than once. He shamed people, he shamed me and people like me because I had a different view from him. Called protesters who were trying to protect their god damn rights as boofheads and conspiracy theorists and much more worse. He was part of a machine that controlled our lives for years. There’s been no accountability for any of these people who destroyed so many lives. All is forgiven because he went on a podcast and said a few words? Is that all it takes for someone when they have deliberately and knowingly helped destroy so many innocent peoples lives? We need accountability from these people, not apology tours that are meaningless to those that were harmed and persecuted for so many years. I simply refuse to accept that we just forgive and forget what was done to so many of us without any of them facing real consequences that WE faced for not submitting to the tyranny that they ALL put us through.

@BmartinBrent @elonmusk I think that’s the point of the movie, vigilantism is what happens when the government and people do nothing.

I watched the film. This is disturbing. I understand the visceral reaction to the injustice portrayed in the film, but I worry that unhinged members of our society might try to copy the main character. There has to be a better way to deal with this very real threat than resorting to vigilantiism. Let's use our voices and our votes to change the policies that are allowing the atrocity of mass illegal migration rather than resorting to violence. WE can do better!

@ImmortanZit The only reason most people have watched this movie is idiots like you saying it shouldn't be seen

This movie needs to be banned and the people associated with it arrested and forced to apologize. 😡😡😡😡😡

Perhaps you are just narrow minded and can't accept that different formats of interviews exist. Criticisms and critiques of Tommy Robinson are everywhere and don't need to be mentioned during the interview. Viewers can listen to what his perspective is and form their own opinions. I rolled my eyes at the concept of the interview but the reaction to it is absolutely ridiculous

Karl Stefanovic being sacked for platforming Tommy Robinson this week isn’t completely about who he interviewed — it’s about how. Robinson is a former British National Party member turned white supremacist agitator who pushes “Remigration” — the forced removal of non-white people — in coded language. Stefanovic never raised any of it. He told Robinson he admired his “tenacity and courage,” agreed when Robinson talked about whipping up anger to “cause an earthquake” — “why not, this is a great country and it’s so lost” — and asked him how the right could “take power” here within three years. He posted himself with his arm around Robinson, the two laughing together. That’s not investigative journalism. That’s normalising an extremist. There’s nothing new about journalists interviewing extremists — done properly, it’s some of the most important journalism there is. When BBC’s Question Time put BNP leader Nick Griffin in front of 8 million viewers in 2009, the panel tore into his Holocaust denial and links to extremist groups on live television. When Vice News embedded with white nationalists in Charlottesville in 2017, the resulting documentary won a Peabody and four Emmys — for capturing them in their own words, threats included, with nothing softened. Hard questions, no flattery, the extremist exposed rather than humanised. Stefanovic did the opposite. This is the same Stefanovic who once praised multiculturalism on air and told his own immigrant grandparents’ story. His podcast now runs on the opposite frame entirely — Hanson as his debut guest in January, back again in May, a Robinson interview landing six days after Hanson told the National Press Club “we must be monocultural.” No explanation was ever given for his complete ideological about-face. The timing lines up with one thing only: his move from network TV, where this would never be allowed to air, to an unaccountable, monetised podcast where it can. Why? Money. Kyle Sandilands took a $12 million payout from his old network and is now openly “sharpening” Hanson’s messaging on a new show. Multiple high-profile broadcasters landing on the identical politics in the identical commercial window isn’t conviction. It’s a market — and sadly platforming white supremacists and normalising them is what’s currently selling.

@stchromas Not a bad effort given she is reciting statistics snd probably doesn’t post videos regularly. Odd thing to fixate on though

@cabbagetwister @sumeyyailanbey Chair

@AlcomaChris @sumeyyailanbey Cuck.

Tone-deaf Stefanovic has the hide to bag the network that made him a star and paid him millions smh.com.au/business/compa…

@janusethical @sumeyyailanbey 🤣🤣

@AlcomaChris @sumeyyailanbey I will never buy his crap ! NEVER

@janusethical @sumeyyailanbey And now all of this free publicity for his podcast most people hadn’t even heard of will make him even more money. Censorship is great for business

@AlcomaChris @sumeyyailanbey Yes he should ,considering he hD nothing to do but #spreadhate for getting paid 2.5 million per year ! #GoodRiddance

@BenNiteShymalan Are Oscars a reward for actors with a career of work, or an award for the best performance in the year?

@NavaretteHQ I watched it this morning, it was entertaining enough. Inde was great in most of her scenes but towards the end it didn’t really showcase her skills very well, editing was too tight

Good morning people today's my off day so i go to bed late and wake up later more than the usual i hope your day will go right in every ways ☀️🐋 Today's inde comes from a different type of project do you know where she looks like this?😯

@sourpatchkidsx One day a girl asked me if I liked fake boobs, I was honest and didn’t realise hers were fake 😅

i feel like titties only look good when they’re real

@tommorris32 @7AFL @1116sen They haven’t just hired Hird yet?

Essendon has outlined its process to appoint its next senior coach in a letter to members. No externals. Three board members, the CEO and the HR boss. @7AFL @1116sen

@mark_collins09 @Jac5Connor Did this movie blow up because people were praising it or criticising it? I would have thought it was at the point where people would just shrug there shoulders at anything he does

@Jac5Connor It's hard for me to reconcile that he's currently one of the most talked about filmmakers. Given his body of work.

I've been following the Citizen Vigilante drama because, as a lover of terrible movies, I've seen most of Uwe Boll's movies. Though, clearly this is a much different play from, say, "BloodRayne" (RT Score: 4%, though starring Oscar-winner Ben Kingsley). The last thing I imagined would ever happen is Elon Musk posting the full-length movie. Which either means he bought it, licensed it for X, or hit some kind of rev share deal with Boll. For those uninitiated, it's controversial because it stars Armie Hammer of "Cancelled for sending cannibalism sexts to his girlfriend" fame (and Lone Ranger) going around Europe mowing down criminal immigrants and judges, Deathwish-style. X is throwing down the gauntlet for films banned everywhere else (probably mostly right wing, but not necessarily). Huh. NB: Hollywood made $8.87 billion theatrical last year. Musk could buy and sell Hollywood and it would barely make a dent.

@stupidsoldier9 @xpaseqx The point is the people want the concept/idea and will rate the film highly regardless of the execution

@AlcomaChris @xpaseqx but that's not the point

Citizen Vigilante Rotten Tomatoes reviews: The official critics vs the people 🤣.

@mgann246043 @MikeCarlton01 Not all interviews need to be confrontational.

@AlcomaChris @MikeCarlton01 he didn't interview him. Stefanovic is supposed to be a journo. He didn't ask him any questions about his past Yaxley-Lennon is an ex violent soccer hooligan.

I confess I’m puzzled by the fascination with Stefanovic. Who cares ? The Today Show died in the arse after Lisa Wilkinson left, watched only in nursing homes where the inhabitants were too frail to reach for the remote. abc.net.au/news/2026-06-2…