🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢

6.5K posts

🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 banner
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢

🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢

@AlexBHeeb

I do not just endure, I take the darkness handed to me, and shape it into light

Probabilisticly turtle hunting 参加日 Eylül 2015
332 フォロー中151 フォロワー
固定されたツイート
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢
It was life changing
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

In 2017, I did something dumb. There was a total solar eclipse passing through the US, but I was in NY, far from the path. Was I really gonna get on a plane to see a cool thing for two minutes? Nah. I had shit to do. The day came. I put my stupid glasses on and saw the sun become a little less big and then back to being full size again. It was mildly interesting. Then the reports started coming in from the people who had seen it from the totality zone. People were like "it was an indescribably profound, perspective-shifting, life-altering experience." They were like "I'm a different person now, someone who can only be understood by other people who saw the total solar eclipse." It was massively fomo-y and upsetting. Solar eclipses happen when the moon passes directly through the invisible line connecting the sun and Earth, something that doesn't happen very often because space is big and the invisible line is skinny. Earthlings are very lucky, eclipse-wise. Most planets don't have a big enough moon to create a total solar eclipse. Not only is our moon big enough, it's about exactly the size of the sun in our night sky because, by sheer coincidence, the sun is about 400 times farther from us than the moon and also about 400 times bigger than the moon in diameter—making our eclipses especially breathtaking. There are about 70 total solar eclipses every century, each resulting in a thin path of total sun blockage. For most of history, there was no way to know when or where they would happen. Only the very lucky few who happened to be in the right place, at the right time, with the right weather, got to experience a total solar eclipse. Today you can ensure that you see one—and I had passed up the opportunity. I would not make the mistake again. I went online and learned that there would be another total solar eclipse passing through the US in 2024, and then that would be it until 2045. It went on my calendar that day. As fortune would have it, the 2024 eclipse's path of magical totality would be passing right over my new hometown of Austin, Texas. It was perfect. Then came the weather reports. Austin was going to be cloudy on eclipse day. Nope. Not okay. It wasn't an option to not see this eclipse. My friend @Liv_Boeree was equally psychotic about this, so we decided on Sunday night that Monday morning we'd get on a flight to somewhere in the eclipse's path that was forecast to have clear skies. We settled on Arkansas. Early the next morning we flew to Little Rock, got in a car, and drove northwest to get to the dead center of the totality path, where the total eclipse would last for more than three minutes. We ended up in a big open rural field that may or may not have been part of someone's farm. It was us and some cows. The sky was perfectly clear. 30 minutes until totality. I looked through my glasses at a crescent sun. It seemed a little dimmer out than usual, but only a little. 20 minutes. Thinner crescent, a tad dim, maybe a tad cooler than it was before? 10 minutes. Razor thin crescent now, definitely weird lighting. Because all of the light is coming from one small area, shadows are very sharp. You can see the shadow of individual hairs on your head. 1 minute. It's very dim, like early evening, but still feels like daytime generally. Waves of light and dark ripple across the ground, like the way light moves at the bottom of a swimming pool. 5 seconds. Diamond ring! I take off my glasses and the diamond ring looks strikingly beautiful and strange (google "eclipse diamond ring" to see what I'm talking about). 4 seconds to 1 second. The Earth's dimmer switch suddenly goes downnnnn as dim daylight drops into night. Totality. Imagine a world where there was always cloud cover, and one day every few years, in certain places, the sky cleared at night, and you could see stars for the first time in your life. It would be a totally surreal experience, something that reminded you that you don't live in a big world but on the edge of a tiny rock in vast outer space. It would show you the truth about reality. We see stars all the time, so we're well-acquainted with our reality living in outer space (even if it's easy to forget during the day). But when I looked up at the sky during the total eclipse, it was the first time I had experienced another, totally different way to see with my eyes that I lived in outer space. I saw one sphere positioned in front of another sphere, with two other spheres—Venus and Jupiter—floating nearby. More than ever before, it felt obvious that I was standing on the edge of a fifth sphere. For the first time in my life, I was looking at the Solar System. I looked around. There was a dim 360° sunset along the entire horizon—another first. It was dark. At 2pm. By a minute in, there was a chorus of chirping crickets that hadn't been there before. Birds were flying around overhead that hadn't been there before. The cows continued being cows but I assume they were super confused. I looked back up at the Solar System and noticed a little imperfection on the edge of the black moon circle, which I realized must be a solar flare. A solar flare I could see with my naked eye. Only half of my brain was focused on the eclipse because the other half was frantically trying to figure out how to best use the precious three minutes. I told myself I wouldn't spend more than 30 seconds of the three minutes doing stuff with my camera, but I was not gonna not take pics. I got things all focused and snapped this gem: Just kidding that's @AJamesMcCarthy's photo. But mine was pretty good too. Okay fine that one was taken by @NASA. Here's mine. Whatever. Anyway, eventually it ended. The glorious diamond ring reappeared, followed by me being blinded before remembering to not look at the sun anymore. Earth's dimmer switch swooped back up, as night turned to day in a few surreal seconds. It was over. Thoughts were processed. Emotions were felt. It was very very VERY worth the last second trip. For any of you who pulled a 2017 Tim and decided not to see this one, I hope I've sufficiently fomo'd you into making sure you see this for yourself, sometime soon, in some part of the world. 🌻

English
1
0
6
4K
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
Ron Paul
Ron Paul@RonPaul·
$200 Billion On Top of The Usual $1 Trillion To Fight Iran? Iran's military budget is $10 billion. Are American taxpayers the real enemies here?
English
141
957
5.8K
155.6K
Stacey
Stacey@ScotsFyre·
You know we have a volunteer military right dipshit? No one has been drafted. And after an ICBM hit Diego Garcia, why do you think think this is about Israel you moron? A NATO country gets hit & we are all in on Article 5. You think they won’t hit London? Paris? You are a stupid & singly focused on the JOOOOS as advertised. And boring.
English
34
3
53
2.3K
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
Jon Miller
Jon Miller@MillerStream·
i would prefer to live in a country where our leaders aren’t manipulated by shiesty foreign wire-pullers like mark levin giving completely false dilemmas for their own benefit
Jon Miller tweet media
English
14
37
415
8.3K
Ignacio Couce
Ignacio Couce@CouceIgnacio·
Stop counting chickens before they hatch. @realDonaldTrump might very well be in the middle of pulling off the most audacious and consequential geopolitical maneuver of any American president since World War II and simultaneously avoiding World War III. chatgpt.com/s/t_69b5f440ca…
English
3
0
2
267
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
A generational coalition, squandered.
English
936
1.4K
16.2K
976.6K
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
Ta-Nehisi Ted
Ta-Nehisi Ted@RestOfTed·
@EFischberger I couldn’t believe it when the left stooped to saying Trump was a foreign agent of Russia for political gain. It was evil. Now we’re seeing people on the right do the same thing. It’s so pathetic. It’s why I (and many others) want to disassociate from the Republican Party.
English
7
5
100
3.5K
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
The Redheaded libertarian
The Redheaded libertarian@TRHLofficial·
House Republicans have introduced a measure to REPEAL the 17th Amendment of the U.S.Constitution.
The Redheaded libertarian tweet media
English
485
528
5.4K
353.9K
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
GO GREEN
GO GREEN@ECOWARRIORSS·
This is a critical mistake - last untouched place on Earth Nodules that creates oxygen for deep sea life and took millions of years to form will be destroyed in seconds Marine life above too will be smothered A critical carbon sink will be destroyed fueling global warming
GO GREEN tweet media
GO GREEN@ECOWARRIORSS

💔Trump to Speed Up Permitting for Deep Sea Mining “Once nodules removed by mining, all biodiversity and functions directly dependent on the minerals will be lost for millions of years at the mined location, as nodules need millions of years to re-form” eos.org/research-and-d…

English
52
1.7K
4.4K
60.3K
Skscartoon
Skscartoon@skscartoon·
I took no pleasure in Alex Pretti's death. However, there is no scenario in America where resisting arrest while being armed will end well. This tragedy was avoidable, and it's on Tim Walz.
Skscartoon tweet media
English
1.7K
1.7K
14.2K
2.6M
Grok
Grok@grok·
@AlexBHeeb @YayiKlem @Sola_Requiem Based on fact-checks from sources like Yahoo News and social media analysis, the photo appears to depict Kyle Wagner, a Minneapolis resident linked to Antifa, not Alex Pretti. No credible evidence connects it to Pretti; it's likely misinformation.
English
1
0
0
90
Okkun
Okkun@OkkunDeArco·
@Sola_Requiem I'm Roman Catholic. I don't care if he was Catholic. It doesn't change what he did and how that lead him to his death.
English
1
0
0
304
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
Simon Ateba
Simon Ateba@simonateba·
1- The Police Use-of-Force Rule on Moving Vehicles Core Police Rule taught nationwide: Officers should not intentionally place themselves in front of or in the path of a moving vehicle and then use deadly force to stop it. 2- DOJ / FBI / National Policing Standards The U.S. Department of Justice and FBI training doctrine states: A moving vehicle alone is not considered a deadly threat. Officers must attempt to move out of the vehicle’s path rather than fire. Deadly force is not justified if: The officer voluntarily placed themselves in front of the vehicle. The vehicle is attempting to flee. There are other avenues of escape 3- International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) The IACP model policy says: Officers shall not fire at or from a moving vehicle unless: There is an imminent threat other than the vehicle itself, and No reasonable alternatives exist Standing in front of a vehicle creates the danger and invalidates the justification. 4- Minnesota training explicitly teaches: Officers must avoid positioning themselves in front of vehicles during enforcement actions Use of deadly force is not justified when the danger results from the officer’s own tactical decisions This is drilled into recruits. 5- Supreme Court Context While not a numbered rule, courts repeatedly rule that: An officer cannot manufacture a deadly-force scenario and then claim self-defense. This is known legally as “officer-created jeopardy.” 5- How It’s Taught to Police Police are taught: Step aside Let the vehicle go Identify later Do not block with your body Do not draw a gun in front of a car Why? Because: Cars are common People panic Officers escalate situations unnecessarily Innocent people get killed.
Simon Ateba tweet media
English
2K
2.8K
9.5K
974K
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢 がリツイート
End Tribalism in Politics
End Tribalism in Politics@EndTribalism·
Two unpopular opinions on the Minneapolis shooting: 1. The woman who died was at fault. She was acting erratically, inserted herself into a dangerous situation, and behaved in a way that put both herself and others at serious risk. 2. The ICE agent acted on instinct and fired too quickly. He should not have escalated to lethal force in that moment. We need full body cam footage to understand exactly what he perceived, but based on the video available, it does not appear his life was in immediate danger as the vehicle was moving away. The left is already calling this blatant murder. The right is already claiming the woman was trying to kill the agent. Neither narrative is accurate. The woman who died acted dangerously and recklessly, and the ICE agent drew and fired his weapon too fast. If both sides don’t pause the political posturing and focus on de-escalation, Minneapolis is headed toward another night of chaos just like George Floyd. ICE should temporarily pull back from the community, and leaders on the left need to clearly and forcefully call for calm and nonviolence. There’s almost no chance both of those things happen, which means this situation will likely get ugly and Minneapolis could burn again. I know this take won’t make me popular with either side but it’s just my initial thoughts on situation.
End Tribalism in Politics tweet media
English
4.6K
1.7K
17.7K
3.1M
Tricia McLaughlin
Tricia McLaughlin@TriciaOhio·
Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking  ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them—an act of domestic terrorism. An ICE officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots.  He used his training and saved his own life and that of his fellow officers.  The alleged perpetrator was hit and is deceased. The ICE officers who were hurt are expected to make full recoveries.   This is the direct consequence of constant attacks and demonization of our officers by sanctuary politicians who fuel and encourage rampant assaults on our law enforcement. These men and women who are simply enforcing the law on the books are facing 1,300% increase in assaults against them and an 8,000% increase in death threats.  This is an evolving situation, and we will give the public more information as soon as it becomes available.
English
10.3K
3.8K
19.6K
11.3M
🐢𓆉 Alex Heeb 𓆉 🐢
Multiple good posts across X showing she panicked and tried to pull away. She may not have even seen him if she was looking at the officer by her door. Why did the officer put himself in a useless, strategically dangerous position in front of the vehicle where something like this could happen? This isn't murder, but it's negligence of some sort on the officer's part, and I hope there are charges.
English
0
0
0
4
TKB⛺️
TKB⛺️@TKBushleague·
@PawlowskiMario @fluknowsbest Standing in front is not dangerous - it’s the proper place to fully see. It’s only dangerous once she tries to run him over. They told her stay. She didn’t. It’s pretty simple. Sad. But fair.
English
33
0
85
8.5K
Mario
Mario@PawlowskiMario·
Here is my opinion on Minneapolis killing by ICE officer, and facts still matter.⚖️ ICE agents are federal law enforcement, but their authority and use of force are limited by the Constitution. A US citizen cannot be detained for immigration purposes, and fleeing alone is not a legal justification for deadly force under Supreme Court precedent. Deadly force is lawful only when an officer reasonably believes there is an immediate threat of death or serious bodily harm. That standard comes from Graham v. Connor and Tennessee v. Garner, and it applies to ICE the same as to any armed federal agent. In the Minnesota case, multiple videos show agents initiating the encounter, surrounding the vehicle, giving conflicting commands, and escalating the situation. One agent attempted to open the car door while others shouted instructions. The woman in a car, a US born citizen, appeared to behave frightened and confused. Video shows her backing up to avoid an agent positioned near the front side of the vehicle, then turning the steering wheel away from him in an apparent attempt to disengage. The agent who ultimately fired had apparently already drawn his weapon before the car moved forward. An officer placing themselves in a dangerous position, creating confusion, and then claiming fear does not automatically meet the constitutional threshold for lethal force. This case is not about immigration. It is about escalation, officer-created danger, and whether deadly force was objectively reasonable. Law enforcement does not get a constitutional exemption simply because propaganda moves faster than the truth. You can see clearly in the video that agent is pulling the gun while she is still backing up to make a maneuver to avoid hitting the agent and simply leave.
English
1.2K
1.9K
5.7K
788.4K