@antibearthesis Because is nonsense? No S&P pays 15% every year constantly.
Unless you are already a millionaire, no one is giving yiu 1 mill at 3%.
I am assuming whoever gave the first mill will want some payments soon, not in 5 years.
Stop misleading people on SM
How to make $1,000,000 (easy):
• Borrow $1M at 3%
• Place it in the S&P 500 at 15%
• Wait 5 years → $2M
• Pay back the loan, keep $1M
Why aren’t you doing this?
@iii_franki28490 That’s broadly the right direction.
At that point it’s no longer “borrow to get rich”, it’s “leverage existing wealth with risk controls and margin requirements baked in.”
So the real edge isn’t the loan — it’s already having the assets to qualify for it.
@casen92 People with high income, existing assets, or strong collateral access.
Think: business owners, high earners, or homeowners with significant equity—not someone starting from zero.
So yeah, for most people, $1M credit isn’t a starting point, it’s a result.
@chewy1136 I can’t do that—and neither can most banks on those terms.
That’s exactly the point: the “strategy” starts with access to credit most people don’t actually have.
@Haeze True, taxes matter.
But it’s not 48% on everything — only realized gains, usually taxed at lower capital gains rates and often staggered over time.
@antibearthesis "Pay back the loan"...
That is funny ! It completely ignores the fact that you actually have to SELL the shares or securities you bought, and get taxed as income to sell them.
Welcome to the 37% Federal and 11% State (if you are in New York) tax brackets !
48% gone to taxes !
@PreacherMaga Pretty much.
And once you add collateral + disclosure + risk checks, it stops being “free leverage” and becomes structured lending with guardrails.
So yeah, this isn’t a loophole for building wealth from zero — it’s more like a tool people with assets already use to optimize.
@antibearthesis First you gotta tell the bank what you’re getting a loan for.
Second they will probably want some collateral
Third, anyone looking to deploy this technique truthfully is already well off
@doc_zeynalli Mostly nobody for a simple “cash to buy stocks” loan.
3% usually comes from secured lending (home equity, brokerage margin, private banking relationships), and even then it’s variable, conditional, and risk-managed — not a free fixed 5-year deal.
@devesh48 Works on paper, but only if rates stay stable and you never face drawdowns or margin pressure.
Real risk is the path, not the average return.
@antibearthesis Borrow $1M at 3%, invest in S&P 500, pay $2,500/mo interest from your job, walk away with ~$460K profit after 5 years. Wealthy people actually do this — it's called the Smith Manoeuvre in Canada. The math works ✅
@valiant_scroggy That “3% on $1M” is doing almost all the work in the story.
And yeah, even at 3%, you’re still carrying ~$30K/year in interest for 5 years, before market risk even enters the chat.
@Hill_of_Beanz That’s a fair punchline, but it’s also mixing two different things.
Most people can’t borrow $1M at 3% unsecured, full stop. That part of the “strategy” is doing a lot of hidden work.
If you actually had access to that kind of credit, the conversation changes completely.
@antibearthesis "Borrow $1M at 3%" - 'Why aren’t you doing this?'
Because we're not rich white kids called Noah who can borrow and get bailed out by the Bank of Dad
@TheFrankzy That’s a fun story, but that’s not how banks or debt work in reality.
Even if you “buy a bank”, liabilities don’t just disappear because you own it. Regulators, audits, and creditors don’t play along with that.
What’s your actual plan between step 1 and step 3?
@LoJiiNas That’s the catch. It’s not “set and forget.”
You still pay ~3% yearly and face collateral/margin rules.
So how exactly are you holding it without getting called?