kisha 🪬
2.9K posts


#Bitcoin We won't know if that was THE top unless we close weekly below $67,250 If that happens AND $BTC remains historically predictable then we have key levels below Distribution - Accumulation - Instant reversal These levels have been respected for every BTC bear market

#bitcoin I've been trying to find a range for proper accumulation in this bear market. @tradingroomapp recommended the use of Fibonacci based on the July low in 2017 which tells us 78.6% fib is already tested. What happens if it breaks down? It could go something like this:





این روش به سختی روی همراه اول وصل میشه حدود یک ربع طول کشید اما وصل شد درحالیکه هیچ کانفیگ من وصل نمیشه بدون bridge


$MON Allocation Analysis I have analyzed the $MON airdrop distribution and here are the key findings:👇 ➖76,022 addresses are eligible to receive $MON as airdrop ➖Total $MON allocated: 3,330,583,396 tokens (fully claimable by eligible addresses) ➖Minimum allocation: 1500 $MON (received by 4980 addresses) ➖Maximum allocation: 12.2M $MON (allocated to address: 0xfE25BBE82c87Fab5D8283799B3627b98543D29CF) ➖Average $MON allocated: 43811.36 $MON ➖Median $MON allocated: 12000 $MON ➖~73% of addresses (55,537) received less than 25,000 $MON ➖~35% of total airdrop is concentrated in just 456 addresses (>1M $MON each) Many users like @monad airdrop because big holders got huge rewards, which excites investors and creates buzz. Many others don’t like it, saying it’s unfair and gives too much to a few while most get little. Is this setup strong enough to keep the $MON price high? 🫡 Data source: raw.githubusercontent.com/monad-crypto/a…

⚠️ Be Careful When Using @Rabby_io 2 days ago, I lost $1,000 while swapping tokens using Rabby Wallet due to a wrong route execution. i’ve been using Rabby for swaps for over a year, sometime had some problem but small. Here’s what happened: I swapped 0.35 ETH (~$1,400) to $baseshake on Base chain. The UI showed the best route as KyberSwap with ~5% slippage - i didn’t change anything. But after confirming, the swap executed through OpenOcean with 67% slippage, and I only received around $500 worth of tokens. I swapped $baseshake on Rabby 2–3 times before this event with no problem. But this time, the route changed without any notice. I contacted Rabby support, but they simply replied that nothing was wrong with their product - no accountability, no help. My follow-up message was seen but never replied to. 1k is not much but imagine if this happens to someone swapping $50k or $100k - it could ruin lives. People trust Rabby because of its UI and convenience, but this kind of issue is serious and dangerous and the customer service is disaster. I wasn’t planning to post this publicly if I had received a proper answer from Rabby support - but unfortunately, I didn’t. So i'm writing this to remind pp be careful when using Rabby. I will never use it again.





At Ledger, we strongly believe in an open-source approach. It's a great set of principles that advocates openness and transparency, some of our core values. That's why we're constantly working towards making source code components available, reviewable, and auditable. Importantly, a majority of Ledger's code is open source, including Ledger Wallet™, Wallet API, Secure SDK, and embedded applications on our devices. Open-source software reduces the need for trust from users, however, it's not entirely bulletproof. Open-source software on non-secure chips will still be highly vulnerable to side-channel and fault attacks. Given the choice of using the Secure Element and being almost completely open-source vs using a non secure chip and being fully open-source, Ledger chooses the more secure approach. We encourage everyone to research thoroughly and make informed decisions about their security. With a decade of innovation, over 8 million devices sold, and a track record of zero hacks, Ledger stands as the trusted leader in hardware wallet security. Ledger takes transparency seriously. While we employ proprietary software for our Secure Elements, this choice ensures the highest level of tamper resistance and security. You can review key components like the OS commands dispatcher and entry points of Ledger Recover implementation, with more parts of the Ledger OS being gradually released for verification. Our proprietary software is essential for the security of the Secure Elements, which utilize advanced technology from trusted manufacturers to implement hardware countermeasures against potential attacks, even with physical access. Some code is tied to the Secure Element's security peripherals, which are proprietary intellectual property of the manufacturer. Revealing this would compromise the very security we aim to protect. Learn more: support.ledger.com/article/111323…









