bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧

8.5K posts

bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧 banner
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧

bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧

@blockamoto

Creator of Bitmap Theory and https://t.co/Go71L6uZA7🔌🧙‍♂️🌐 | Take advantage of data's unique ability to be parsed from different angels.

0.bitmap 参加日 Mayıs 2023
2.2K フォロー中18.6K フォロワー
固定されたツイート
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
And... let the Signal commence! signal.bitmap.land From this day forth, you may cast your Signal to vote for a District to become the Seat of your Hood. A Hood is 2016 Districts. There can only be one Seat. Hood Seats are recounted at the end of every. A Period is 2016 Blocks. If a Seat has the majority, they gain points for each District in the Hood minus any Veto's. If a Seat has a plurality, they gain points equal to the amount of Signals they received. Your Signal votes remain valid until the Halving. At the Halving are the Elections. Here, we determine an Elect (address) and a Capital (District) for each Sector. A Sector is 210,000 Districts. The Elect is determined by checking which address has the most points from Seat wins within the Sector. The Capital is determined by checking which of the Elects Seats has the highest Signal. The Elect and Capital remain until the next Election. These are the basic rules of the game. You cast your signal with: {"signal": {"hood": "[signal]"}} Replace [signal] with the Bitmap District inside the Hood you'd like to signal for. You nominate yourself by Signalling for the same District as the District that is Signalling. Signals are only counted for nominated Districts. You can also replace [signal] with veto or defer. A veto is a vote against all options. Defer allows the Parcels of your District to vote for what the District Signal is. You can read more here: ordinals.com/inscription/84…
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧 tweet media
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧@blockamoto

The signal module for termina.land has been inscribed! You may cast your signals from 945,000 onwards. The first Hood Seat counting happens at the end of Period 498, which is at Block 945,503, likely on Friday. Keep up with the countdown at signal.bitmap.land.

English
6
11
51
1.8K
laz1m0v
laz1m0v@laz1m0v·
Read the Review Draft here: github.com/BitcoinWorldTr… We are moving from verifying transaction correctness to deriving transaction necessity. No consensus changes required. The Bitmachine is alive
laz1m0v tweet media
English
1
9
15
1.3K
laz1m0v
laz1m0v@laz1m0v·
The era of Passive Observation on Bitcoin is over. Today, we publish the PRECOP v0.1.0-alpha Whitepaper: Programmable Sovereignty on L1. By introducing the Canonical Transaction Derivation Engine, invalid semantic states are now mathematically impossible to sign.
laz1m0v tweet media
English
3
12
19
2.8K
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧 がリツイート
Kane Mayfield 🏴‍☠️
Kane Mayfield 🏴‍☠️@KaneMayfield·
When i say it's in the book... I'm not kidding
Kane Mayfield 🏴‍☠️ tweet mediaKane Mayfield 🏴‍☠️ tweet media
English
2
7
24
725
KURO’
KURO’@PhotoKuro_·
The Ethereum NFT community is once again discussing the risk of IPFS-stored media disappearing, with a growing call for everyone to start pinning their own assets. I believe the root issue has always been the technical and cost barriers. From my perspective, Ordinals offer a real alternative. While BTC Ordinals still face high fees and strict size limits, BSV Ordinals (1Sat Ordinals) solve this practically — with fees often just a few cents and inscription sizes reaching tens of MB. Of course, compared to Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Tezos, Sui, and others, the BSV community is smaller, with challenges in liquidity and ecosystem growth. It also carries baggage from past delistings, the Satoshi Trials, and the original Bitcoin vision debates. Still, I think it’s time to refocus on the core question: What does a blockchain truly need? This post might not reach far beyond the BSV community — and that’s okay. To everyone in BSV: Let’s quietly and steadily keep building what we believe in.
English
1
0
2
187
RARE WELSH
RARE WELSH@RareWelsh·
I'm now fully in support of BIP 110 after seeing who supports the freezing of UTXO's.
English
21
53
315
6.6K
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
@MajorianBTC Built an operating system on Bitcoin, and builders are crafting the interweb on Bitcoin, with no adverse affect to Bitcoin, but all you want to talk about are monkey pictures.
English
1
0
1
16
Majorian / BIP-110
Majorian / BIP-110@MajorianBTC·
Remember that many holier-than-thou types have railed against BIP-110 for supposedly being a confiscatory proposal (which is easily disproven). Meanwhile, BIP-361 is an outright confiscatory proposal, the hypocrisy is off the charts.
English
5
16
75
1.8K
KPM◉◉N
KPM◉◉N@KPMoon·
Ordinals > Ethereum
English
2
2
15
258
BVM
BVM@GarzonPiggy79·
@caprioleio Everyone knew the block reward problem was coming in a halving or two. Regardless of quantum. Its been one of the main criticisms to btc for years
English
1
0
0
108
Charles Edwards
Charles Edwards@caprioleio·
This is a wild and concerning trend for Bitcoin. This is far worse than I had realized. This is a list of all the major public Bitcoin miners. ALL have made statements to pivot to AI. ALL are targeting major shares of revenue from AI from here, not Bitcoin. On average current Bitcoin revenue is expected to drop from 90% to just 30% in the next 2-3 years! Do you see a pattern? The stocks doing the best in recent years all jumped into AI big time. Those with 80%+ AI share of revenue targets saw their stocks climb up over 500% on average. Those targeting <60% AI revenue saw 1/10th the growth, with many having negative 2 year returns. The message is clear. If these numbers are even half accurate, and they are based on direct company statements, the energy and commitment to Bitcoin is under significant threat over the next 2-3 years. All while Quantum computing is taking off and poses an existential threat to Bitcoin unless we change the code. Many of these miners are not even planning to upgrade or renew Bitcoin mining hardware at all, simply running out lifespan of the existing and reinvesting only in AI. The market has been voting with its feet. Now the miners are voting with their feet. Just as Bitcoin is about to approach its biggest ever threat in the coming years, the backbone of its security is leaving the industry. Bitcoin used to be famed for having the biggest computing network in the world. It's now collapsing into AI at record pace.
Charles Edwards tweet media
English
303
70
492
178.8K
Curtis Green⚡️
Curtis Green⚡️@ilovepoker·
yep, with only 7tx per second miners income will be next to nothing in a couple more halving. miners are now telling us this so in 10 years it won't be such a surprise. miners are the freaking backbone of btc security. we might not have to wait for Quantum mining to hurt btc. miners are going where the money is at... AI is the moneymaker. they'll need more income to come back. this is one of the reasons bip300/1 is so important. could you imagine if all the altcoins ran off bitcoin? the miners would have a lot more income. I'm afraid it will be too late when they figure this out.
English
2
0
0
313
DGMD.6529
DGMD.6529@DGMD22·
meh, this argument is starting to get lame tbh Ordinals are cool. Art on bitcoin is cool. But you can have fully on-chain art on Ethereum, and much of it is now. Platforms who printed tons of off-chain art in the mania 2021-era shutting down is not an argument that all art needs to move to bitcoin. There is no argument anymore that Eth as a chain is just going to cease to exist... If another 5 years pass and all bitcoin remains used as is 'digital gold', the argument becomes easier that bitcoin is the one at risk to not have longevity. I hold bitcoin, I love bitcoin. But the Bitcoin-maxi era for blockchain technology makes no sense anymore. There is a huge market demand for DeFi, RWA, AI, Privacy, Consumer App solutions and bitcoin has yet to figure out the L1/L2 solutions to take any market share in these areas. So therefore... we need more than bitcoin.
rocktoshi@rocktoshi21

NFT platforms shutting down and sunsetting storage is to be expected. The message is clear: permanence lives on Ordinals. If you care about your legacy, put your work on Bitcoin.

English
11
1
45
3.9K
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
@DGMD22 It's a million times easier to inscribe a HTML with recursion than to create an on-chain ETH smart contract. So we can create entire operating systems, FPS games (with online multiplayer), on-chain on Bitcoin. ETH is like... Cool, we got another image on-chain. At best, voxels.
English
0
0
4
122
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
It's hardcoded in the Ord protocol. If you subscribe to the theory that counting numbers goes up, and indexing starts at 0, then you use Ord protocol. If somebody else decides we count down and numbers start at 1, let them have it. It will fail, but let them try just to show you why it's silly to think there's any other way.
English
0
0
1
21
zacks.eth
zacks.eth@0xzxch·
@blockamoto @ord_io @foundation Doesnt matter if its the best or not. Thats the part many people look over. Its not hardcoded enforced. Like a smart contract for example.
English
1
0
0
3
Ord.io
Ord.io@ord_io·
BREAKING: Ethereum NFT platform @foundation just announced that it is shutting down and that all of the art will be rugged in one year This is why it's important to store art fully on-chain with protocols like Ordinals
Ord.io tweet media
English
56
130
528
53.4K
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
You own sats that can be tracked through inputs back to coinbase and indexed based on position. You own the sats. It doesn't throw it off balance, it creates the balance. Inscriptions can only be traded this way. If ordinals didn't work, it wouldn't be possible. The debate isn't whether it's a balanced system, it's whether it's the best possible system, and so far it has proven to be. Otherwise another theory would take its place, and if it's better, it should. But I don't see a better method than standard "counting".
English
1
0
0
20
zacks.eth
zacks.eth@0xzxch·
@blockamoto @ord_io @foundation Well the numbering system isnt really the big deal, its the attaching ownership to those various possible numbering systems that throws it off balance.
English
1
0
0
7
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
@0xzxch @ord_io @foundation Just like base 10 is the best possible solution for human counting, but base 2 is best for computing. We could also use base6, sure, but why would we? Maybe to solve a DIFFERENT problem, in which case it's not in opposition.
English
1
0
0
15
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
@0xzxch @ord_io @foundation Case in point... Ethereum exists. Bitcoin still exists. The difference here is that different solutions have different benefits. In the Ord scenario, it's okay for alternatives to exist, but the key factor is Ordinals is the best possible solution so it would be pointless.
English
2
0
0
37
zacks.eth
zacks.eth@0xzxch·
@blockamoto @ord_io @foundation Sure, I agree its the best option as well to be fair. But it's not the only hard-coded option. And thats not up for opinion of best or worst. If theres more than one way to prove ownership of a specific sat, then its not THE way.
English
1
0
0
13