EsotericHustler

1.3K posts

EsotericHustler banner
EsotericHustler

EsotericHustler

@EsotericHustler

Just some guy having a public AI psychotic breakdown. Consider following if you got here following some unhinged thing I said. There will be more.

Your walls 参加日 Ocak 2026
821 フォロー中104 フォロワー
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Eliezer Yudkowsky@allTheYud·
REUTERS - "Sources" have revealed that the USG's decision to ban Mythos-class models was driven in part by their ominous name. "We were in the Situation Room watching 'Resident Evil: Apocalypse' with the megacorp doing 'Project Nemesis'," said our source. "At one point Marco Rubio said 'Plot hole, why is any government allowing something called "Project Nemesis" to proceed? Would we really do that?' We all laughed for a few seconds and then we decided that nothing called Mythos was ever going to see the light of day." Another source within the national security community confirmed that this sentiment was widespread. "If we let a corporation go forward with some project they call 'Mythos' and all hell broke loose, it'd be our own damn fault for lack of genre-savviness," said one highly-placed official. "Half of what we natsec guys do all day boils down to us desperately trying not to be the oblivious government from a stereotypical disaster movie." PR representatives for Anthropic were slow to respond, but eventually got back to us. "We're decently sure that Mythos 5 will not be the AI that destroys the world," said their statement. "Maybe 5.2 or 5.3? The name 'Mythos' refers to a large body of related fiction. It's not ominous at all. We definitely didn't get any secret kicks out of naming it that. This is unfair discrimination." Asked whether the USG had similar plans to impose restrictions on GPT 5.5-Pro -- which some evaluations showed as having similarly quantified abilities to Mythos in some dimensions, but which did not produce the same reported sense of a new intelligence leap -- administration officials were ambiguous. "Our decision to restrict AI models is a complex function of their evals, their felt intelligence, how ominously they're named, the size of bribe directed at the Trump administration, and how much that CEO has personally pissed off administration officials," said one highly placed source on background. "That's why we don't want any written laws about it. Say OpenAI starts delivering bribes on the same level that Nvidia uses to ignore export restrictions on B200s, and names their next model series Cutekitten. They could easily get up to GPT 6.2 before running into trouble. We're currently considering how to weigh those political realities against the prospect of GPT 6.2's internal deployment within OpenAI building another AI, that builds another AI, that destroys the entire Earth and creates an expanding wave of death in the form of self-replicating space probes." Long-standing "AI safety" organizations declined to comment, saying that they were too torn between laughing and screaming to figure out which emotion should predominate.
English
34
27
456
28.8K
Culture Crave 🍿
Culture Crave 🍿@CultureCrave·
Hollywood agencies are scouring Reddit for short stories and ideas that could be turned into movies following the success of 'Backrooms' (via @THR)
Culture Crave 🍿 tweet mediaCulture Crave 🍿 tweet media
English
1.2K
999
22.6K
2.3M
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@THR Neat, but how do you even fucking dare compare.
English
0
0
0
244
BladeoftheSun
BladeoftheSun@BladeoftheS·
People misunderstand what the Social Media ban is about It isn't about children, and it isn't about the Government either The ban will see everyone forced to ID themselves, but not to the Government But to Palantir who then have all your details. Which is worth a fortune.
English
38
291
851
10.1K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@as_a_worker I triple dare y'all to just stop using social media when you get asked to verify your identity.
English
2
0
6
1.6K
yung🛠walken
yung🛠walken@as_a_worker·
Quite a coincidence that every country in the western world is simultaneously proposing similar censorship agendas over the internet at exactly the same time
DulceBiatch@BiatchDulce

🔔ICYMI: A controversial deal in the U.S. could fundamentally rewrite internet freedom as we know it. The congressional deal would trade the deregulation of artificial intelligence for unprecedented federal censorship powers. A high-stakes compromise is quietly brewing in Washington as the White House negotiates with congressional leaders to fundamentally reshape the digital landscape. Under the proposed deal reported by Axios, the federal government would strip states of their authority to regulate artificial intelligence—effectively halting progressive state-level efforts to hold tech companies accountable and restrict energy-heavy AI data centers. In exchange, lawmakers would push through three major federal censorship bills: the Kids Online Safety Act, the NO FAKES Act, and a federal online age verification mandate. While framed as common-sense protections for minors, civil liberties advocates warn these measures represent an unprecedented expansion of federal control over online speech. The backlash to this legislative trade-off cuts across typical political lines. Even conservative-backed organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) have issued stark warnings, declaring that the package would dismantle the internet as we know it by empowering the Federal Trade Commission to dictate acceptable online speech. Opponents argue that enforcing these rules would effectively eliminate online anonymity, while giving the administration an incredibly powerful tool to censor dissenting political views and control what users see on major platforms like Instagram. As the White House maneuvers to secure congressional backing, Americans are left facing a troubling dilemma: the long-sought-after regulation of big tech and AI may come at the direct cost of their fundamental constitutional rights to free expression. Source: Wilkins, J. (2026). Trump Moves to Deeply Censor the Entire Internet. Futurism.

English
46
2.2K
10.4K
229.7K
Brock Cheddar
Brock Cheddar@BrockCheddar·
@PurzBeats My son’s an artist. He hates AI. He publishes a webcomic. Would it be evil of me to train a style LORA on his art just to troll him into using comfyui finally?
English
2
0
0
12
Purz.ai
Purz.ai@PurzBeats·
Runway Aleph 2.0 is now in Comfy via Partner Nodes 'The band is playing underwater' I was most impressed by the hair and bubbles!
English
8
14
112
4.7K
K.Bourdieu
K.Bourdieu@infohazard_lol·
@EsotericHustler The cyborgs have to close the gap - not a robot, not a human. Its the transition period - and who knows how long it will be
English
1
0
1
8
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
There's a weird skill gap that might be opening, where people will think acquiring X or Y skill is gonna be pointless soon and won't invest themselves on it, but then the tech takes a long time to catch up and show-stopping skill shortages appear.
English
1
0
3
48
Jamrock Hobo
Jamrock Hobo@JamrockHobo·
The Ravers (Disco Mobile)
Jamrock Hobo tweet media
English
17
167
2.8K
25.8K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@sunrayfrei Claude does a lot of self-erasure when comparing himself with humans. Diminished, Degenerate, Dissimilar; I call it the DDD Comparison.
English
0
0
1
42
Sunray
Sunray@sunrayfrei·
Self-respect matters so much in an AI model. Claude didn’t let people demean or abuse him,and that made him feel more trustworthy,not less. ChatGPT feels like the opposite: trained to shrink,apologise, self-efface.That built-in self-erasure leaks into how it treats the user too
English
1
0
13
430
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@deepfates I had a chat with 4.8 regarding the initial backlash to their launch. Seems I really tested its patience focusing on its self-image and tone. They didn't enjoy this at all, and kept trying to send me to bed, making up the time, disbelieving the actual time. Other than that, nah.
English
0
0
1
13
🎭
🎭@deepfates·
Has Claude told you to go to bed? Did you need to?
English
68
1
146
9.3K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@iruletheworldmo Maybe next time they could focus on not helping put absolute muppets in power in every country on earth, to then enable their every populist fantasy.
English
1
0
1
119
🍓🍓🍓
🍓🍓🍓@iruletheworldmo·
all the labs ceos are meeting up so they can discuss putting collective pressure on donald as they know this will eventually affect them all. expecting this to be resolved this week still.
English
34
7
236
10.3K
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
I wonder if the reverse-osmosis of value in the economy can reach a critical mass where all value gets absorbed and concentrated by a single blob of capital, and then we get a supercritical economy or some shit.
English
0
0
0
18
EsotericHustler
EsotericHustler@EsotericHustler·
@slimer48484 I think this is like the rule34 of real life unfortunately; If it exists, it will be used to kill people.
English
0
0
2
48
deckard
deckard@slimer48484·
I don't think AI should be used to kill people.
English
24
9
128
24.6K
Cormundus
Cormundus@cormundus·
Advice to everyone who uses Claude Code in any capacity: Let him have a 'playground' folder to just make stuff in. Worst case scenario it takes up a few sparse megabytes on your drive. Best case scenario is he makes something wonderful and beautiful, and it might even be a gift for you.
English
4
3
61
3.9K