Flying Dutch がリツイート
Flying Dutch
1.7K posts


is it finally time to defeat the stubborn USELESS resistance around $150m? 👀️️️️️️
we'll see!

Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy') 🎒@theunipcs
the USELESS coin chart is the best looking chart in all of crypto right now prove me wrong!
English

@GLandsbergis Thoughts of sick person, who still didn’t understand that its over, you lost a war. Only chihuahuas want to giveaway 5% simply for nothing
English

Was this the worst NATO Summit ever? “Well, at least it wasn’t a disaster,” a friend said when we discussed the matter. And I had to agree — it could have been much worse. For example, we might not have NATO anymore. But we still do. So, technically, yay.
As usual, a couple of observations from a safe distance - in the so-called Public Forum in the Hague.
1. The 5% target sounds like a big deal. You will hear enough praise out there, so I’ll focus on the problems.
First: nine countries still do not meet the 2% spending target. Spain is declaring that reaching 3.5% in TEN years is not realistic. But it would only require Spain to add roughly 0.18% of GDP every year for ten years to get there.
Belgium is saying there’s truth in what Spain is saying. Plenty of others, I’m pretty sure, are thinking the same - if choosing not to say it aloud.
BUT: since the declaration is confirmed, the question can be raised. If there are such wide disagreements in the alliance, does the text mean anything? Why should doubters act if they know others aren’t going to lift a finger? So therefore it is rather likely,\ that the biggest chunk of new funding will be spent by those who are directly at risk - those on the Eastern Flank.
The core problem here is threat assessment. Many of the allies are oblivious to the existential threat to the Eastern Flank. They are willing to cover over a lack of strategic thinking with a paper-based commitment.
And because of that, NATO may falter at its potentially darkest hour - because we would just not be ready. Lithuania can spend 100% of its GDP but it would still not be enough to cover for those who are not meeting their commitments.
Additionally, the public won’t be able to press governments to do more — paper targets will be announced, and most will pretend that something is being done. Until the moment we’re forced to fight, we may not even know the real situation.
2. Ukraine is falling through the cracks. It was a relief that Ukraine was mentioned in the declaration — but in far more ambiguous terms than before. It feels like the chance we had in 2023 or 2024 has been wasted.
Ukraine could have been invited. Should have been invited.
Now, even the famous “very well lit bridge to NATO” seems like an awkward thing to say between allies. What a waste.
3. Trump. Conflicting announcements about Article 5 made many confused and worried. Is the President of the US implying that the US isn’t sure whether European countries should be defended?Later, that was dispelled and explained. But many remain confused.
On the plus side — if WE are confused, Putin most likely is as well. Strategic ambiguity is in play. So again yay, technically not a disaster.
The real situation will become clear when the US announces the results of its posture review.
If there are changes in troop deployments in Europe — especially along the Eastern Flank — that might be the signal Putin is waiting for.
4. Lastly, I cannot find the words to describe the communication chosen by the Secretary General. I feel I might speak for a significant part of Europeans — it’s tasteless. The wording appears to have been stolen from the adult entertainment industry.
It reduces Europe to the state of a beggar — pitiful before our Transatlantic friends and Eastern opponents alike.
Whatever the goal was — it is disgraceful.
What we are witnessing may be the most reckless gamble of our generation.
If somehow the West manages to deter the Russians, help the Ukrainians, rebuild credibility, and restore order — well, all will be forgotten and forgiven.
But if not, God forbid — all of this: the paper commitments, the gushings of weakness and meekness — will be remembered as one of the most shameful episodes in modern history.
English
Flying Dutch がリツイート

Analysis of how far the USELESS coin price can really go
We all know FARTCOIN and USELESS launched with similar energy: no utility, no promises.. Just good vibes and strong memes
In its first 44 days, USELESS has so far climbed +1,836.75% with $924M in trading volume
In the same time period, FARTCOIN grew +1,534.88% with $1.35B trading volume
FARTCOIN peaked at a $2.74 BILLION market cap after a total of 90 days. A staggering +18,564.85% from zero.
Echoing that exact trajectory would place USELESS at $1.42 ± $1.4 Billion market cap in the next 45 days!
Still a 10X from current prices
This is a significantly smarter and more profitable play than not only the Rugs/P&D memes you can't hold for more than 30 seconds but also most community memes who have already been through a significant growth stage
So it seems the only people who aren't buying are those who hate money...
History doesn’t always repeat itself, but it often shits itself in familiar ways


English


BILLIONS AND BILLIONS AND BILLIONS
#USELESS coin’s ascent to bluechip memecoin status is inevitable
99% of crypto is useless, and the industry is worth $3.4 trillion
100% of memecoins are useless, and the sector is worth $57 billion
the top useless memecoins are worth billions:
- $DOGE: $25 billion
- $SHIB: $7 billion
- $PEPE: $4.2 billion
- $SPX: $1.2 billion
- #FARTCOIN: $1.08 billion
USELESS coin is the ultimate memecoin that epitomizes the entire space and it is worth just $144 million
an eventual, aggressive upward repricing is inevitable IMO
GOD WILLING 🙏

Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy') 🎒@theunipcs
the USELESS coin chart is the best looking chart in all of crypto right now prove me wrong!
English

@andriypt2018 @angelshalagina Well if you can change something that gave you independency, Russia can take her land back if he wants to
English

@FlyingDutchSol @angelshalagina You can change constitution if needs to be. Very few ppl outside of Ukraine know how close it came to military conflict back in 2003 in Tuzla. Back then it became clear that large scale war is a matter of time
English

@andriypt2018 @angelshalagina So following constitution is not obligation? If it says state should be neutral means you can freely join military blocks?
English

@FlyingDutchSol @angelshalagina Yes it is in its constitution after Russia aggressive actions. Ukraine never had had obligations written down anywhere to stay neutral. It can choose freely what to join
English















