BrazenHussie🌸🦕

The greens love the planet.

I wonder if Hannah Spencer is aware that the Palestinian cafe she just got ‘honoured’ in hosted a celebratory watch party when the Iranian regime bombed Tel Aviv? Green politicians are legitimising some of the WORST people. I feel a bit nauseous. @TheGreenParty

I hope the posturing politicians from yesterday wake up from their"peace and love" hangovers and it dawns on them that on their big day out virtue signalling, they neglected to realise that they effectively demonised everyone not willing to march with them as "far-right" and those people fucking vote. I hope those in trade unions, the working class who union leaders are supposed to represent, people concerned about excessive immigration and uncontrolled asylum-seeking and how it is affecting their communities, realise they are being called "far right" by the people they pay and that those workers withdraw their subs. I hope that those affected by rape gangs, look at what happened yesterday, see that any commentary on their rapes at the hands of Pakistani men was marked out as "far-right". I hope they do not see Zack Polanski dancing but if they do that they are not too upset by the fact he dances on their trauma. No one needs to tell Jews what that march signified. They know. It meant more of their things will burn and more of them must hide in fear of terrorist violence. Yesterday the hard left got high on the fumes of their own virtue. Today and in the months to come they will undoubtedly pay a heavy price for it. The vast majority of people aren't "far-right" and the people aren't stupid.

@JeanHatchet @SingleTicket371 Completely agree! However, those unions, the Green Party, the Labour Party are all so infected by a sanctimonious, puritanical, righteous middle class mindset it’s astonishing. They will be as high as kites today believing they have saved the peasants.

Sitting in a mosque in rural County Kerry, Healy-Rae says Muslims "will be the fabric of this town." There's something extremely sinister about a man like Healy-Rae, who plays up and exaggerates his Irishness while transforming Kerry into the 3rd world.

@KingBobIIV @LouiseWluddite OMG I remember that Mormon sex slave scandal. Front page of the newspapers.

There's a lot to unpack here...

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 In the second half of the eighteenth century, something happened in Scotland. A country of one and a half million people. Produced ideas that changed the entire world. In one generation. Adam Smith. He wrote The Wealth of Nations in 1776. He invented economics. David Hume. He asked the question nobody had dared ask. How do we actually know anything? His answer changed philosophy forever. James Watt. Walking across Glasgow Green, the idea came to him. A separate condenser. It made the steam engine practical. And started the Industrial Revolution. Joseph Black. He discovered latent heat. The principle that made refrigeration, steam power and thermodynamics possible. James Hutton. He looked at the rocks at Siccar Point. And understood the earth was unimaginably old. He invented geology. These men knew each other. They argued in the same taverns. Walked the same streets. In one generation, one small country invented economics, philosophy, geology, thermodynamics and the steam engine. The modern world runs on what they built. 🇬🇧 This is your history. Help us keep it alive. 👇 Be Part Of Us 👉 proudofus.co.uk/support 🙏 Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

If you've ever wondered what it'd be like to watch Mr Bean play football after 10 pints and a Keterpillar in the disabled bog, Keir Starmer has provided this handy video.

Extremely ironic. Leftists are marching against the far right in London today, waving the flag of the islamic regime in Iran - an ultraconservative barbarian theocracy. Leftism is a DISEASE.

@JohnSwinney @theSNP The same Brian Cox that canny be arsed living here? How much did that cost us? What with planes, hotels and a thick brown envelope

Fabulous day on the March for Independence and to share the stage with the legend that is Brian Cox.

Meet Judge Rachel Harrison She is the reason why an elderly pensioner was nearly raped in Sheffield by a Muslim migrant In January Harrison gave Ali Askre a community order for 5 sexual assaults against 2 paramedics If she had jailed him, this lady wouldn’t have been attacked

Daily Mail journalists aren’t going after your family (as you are aware, there is more we could write if we were). I’m a freelance journalist who spoke to your family members who are frightened by the Jew hate in your party. They are frightened by what you have given the green light to. While you once fought Jew hatred, now you indulge it because, as we both see, it is popular. Other political groups have discovered this in the past. Shame on you @ZackPolanski Shame on you.

@is_glasgow @spiralmoney A rangers fan climbed up yesterday and took it down.

The Duke is coneless ... I repeat, the Duke is coneless ... this is not a drill ... Can all available Guardians of the Cone please report to their assigned posts as soon as possible to rectify the situation. #glasgow #dukeofwellington #roadcone #glasgowhumour

The Daily Mail has spoken to three members of Mr Polanski’s extended family – none of whom now talk to him. ‘He’s currently the leader of the future Islamic party of Britain, that’s what the Green Party is fast becoming,’ said one. ‘And there would be no place for Jews in an Islamic state of Britain.’ But family members have described their shock at how the former actor and hypnotist has become leader of a party expressing hatred for Israel. ‘If the Zionism-is-racism motion is passed it will make the Greens the most anti-Semitic party in British history since Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists,’ said a second relation. ‘The idea of it is one of the most sickening things I’ve heard in a long time.’ A third family member said: ‘The mad thing is that he’s gay, he’s Jewish but he’s cosying up to people whose ideology is the complete antithesis of everything that he’s supposed to stand for. It’s like he’s a chicken, telling us to vote for KFC.’ dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

Badenoch Is Right. But She's Asking the Wrong Question. Kemi Badenoch has strong views about face coverings. She has said so herself. Visit her constituency surgery in a burqa and she will ask you to remove it. She is not, she insists, talking to people who won't show her their face. Good. But here is what she also said, and what almost nobody is discussing. The burqa, in her own judgment, is not the real problem. Sharia courts, she said, are "far more insidious." First-cousin marriage. Sectarianism. "A whole heap of stuff that breeds more problems." She said this clearly, on the record. And then the conversation moved on to the piece of cloth. That tells you something about the limits of this debate. A new poll by More in Common found that 56 per cent of Britons believe religious face veils should be banned. That is a two-to-one majority. It is also, it turns out, one of the smaller numbers in the survey. Eighty-seven per cent believe forced marriage should be prohibited. Eighty-four per cent say the same of female genital mutilation. Eighty-three per cent oppose the exclusion of women from public life and the workplace. And 69 per cent want sharia courts prohibited outright. More than two thirds of the country. On the record. Wanting action. The pollster was careful to note that these views do not stem from anti-Muslim hatred. They stem from concern for personal liberty and gender equality. That distinction matters. It is the distinction that serious politicians must be prepared to make and defend. Because the objection will come, as it always does, wrapped in the language of Islamophobia. That word deserves scrutiny. This month, Labour quietly adopted a new official definition of anti-Muslim hostility, to be used by public bodies, councils, and businesses to record incidents of abuse and draw up staff behaviour codes. The definition is broad. Broad enough, a former senior diplomat has already warned, to silence Iranian protesters who voice any hostility toward the Islamic regime that persecutes them. Broad enough, others have noted, to render criticism of sharia courts a recordable incident. Starmer's government is fighting to recover Muslim votes ahead of May's local elections, after Labour was routed in Gorton and Denton. Shabana Mahmood has made clear she believes the state has no business telling women what they may or may not wear. That is a defensible position. It is also one that conveniently forecloses any serious examination of the practices Badenoch herself called more dangerous. The burqa debate is not a distraction in itself. The case for banning full face coverings in public spaces is grounded in something real: the social contract of liberal democracy requires mutual recognition. You show your face in a bank, a school, a courtroom, a polling station. That is not bigotry. It is the basic condition of civic life. The European Court of Human Rights said as much when it upheld France's ban. But a government serious about integration should not stop there. It should ask why sharia courts operating outside the regulated legal system are still permitted to handle family and matrimonial disputes. It should ask what first-cousin marriage rates tell us about the depth of parallel community formation. It should ask whether the new anti-Muslim hostility definition has been designed to answer genuine need or to shut down legitimate questions. Badenoch is right to raise the burqa. She is also right that it is not the main event. The question now is whether she, or anyone in Westminster, has the nerve to say so plainly and follow the argument where it leads. Because the public already has. "The case for banning full face coverings in public spaces is grounded in something real: the social contract of liberal democracy requires mutual recognition. You show your face in a bank, a school, a courtroom, a polling station. That is not bigotry. It is the basic condition of civic life."

I’d like to see a head count of how many from the @UKTogetherAll March pop Straight on over to celebrate one of the greatest woman-hating tyrants in history. All together. Except not women. Why is this man being celebrated in a country he fully wanted to destroy if at all possible?

You won’t believe this. I didn’t. But it is true. In Aarhus, Denmark a 37 year old woman met a migrant in a bar and ended up imprisoned in a flat where she was subjected to a gang rape by three men for 6 hours. One of the men (an Eritrean national) was caught and deported. The other two Eritrean nationals were being actively hunted and Denmark put out an international appeal with their names and photos. The men (Awedin Fikak and Henok Tekleab) fled to France and then took small boats to the UK. They gave their real names and were given food, accommodation and support by the UK government. No checks were done against an international database which would have shown their status as suspected rapists wanted in Denmark. They lived off taxpayer money in the UK for 18 months until it was brought to light that they were wanted criminals. They have now been deported to Denmark to face the justice system. The whole system is farcical. Nobody thought that Eritreans, a nation where 65% of women say they are raped, would be suitable for European integration.

@theSNP Your party has had years to prove itself and all we have got is failure, after failure perverts, racist bigots, men in women’s spaces, huge increase in rapes and sexual assaults. And let’s not forget the fires, the potholes and crumbling infrastructure.

See you at the Independence March and Rally tomorrow in Edinburgh🫡

Downing Street Wiped the Phone Before Anyone Could Find It Scotland Yard has reopened its investigation into the reported theft of Morgan McSweeney's phone, the device that almost certainly contained the most direct evidence of how Lord Mandelson came to be appointed as Britain's ambassador to Washington. Detectives are examining CCTV footage from the Westminster street where McSweeney claims he was robbed on the evening of October 20 last year. They fear the footage will already have been deleted. It is usually stored for only three months. The investigation, in other words, has been reopened into evidence that may no longer exist. On the evening of October 20, McSweeney called 999 from Pimlico. He gave the wrong address. He did not correct the handler when the wrong address was read back to him. He did not identify himself as the Prime Minister's chief of staff. He did not mention that the device contained sensitive government material. The following day, a police officer called to ask whether McSweeney had tracked the phone using its built-in tracker. He did not respond. At some point between the reported theft and that unanswered call, Downing Street remotely wiped the device. This destroyed the tracker. The phone could no longer be located. The messages it contained could no longer be recovered. Now consider what did not happen. The Metropolitan Police were not informed that the missing device belonged to the Prime Minister's chief of staff. MI5 was not informed. GCHQ was not informed. The Information Commissioner's Office, which must by law be notified within 72 hours of any serious data breach involving personal information, was not informed. It told The Telegraph this week that it had received no notification at any stage. Set this against what was happening inside Downing Street at the same moment. Officials had been holding meetings to discuss what they would do if the Conservatives used parliamentary process to force the disclosure of McSweeney's messages with Lord Mandelson. The phrase used in those meetings, according to reports, was coming for Morgan's messages. Days after those meetings concluded, the phone containing Morgan's messages was reported stolen. Days after that, it was wiped. A prosecutorial mind, presented with this sequence, asks one question above all others. At the point when Downing Street chose to wipe the device, did anyone consider that doing so would destroy the tracker and make recovery impossible? The answer is yes. That is what remote wiping does. It is not a passive consequence. It is the purpose. There are innocent explanations available for most of what surrounds this affair. Wrong addresses happen. Unanswered calls happen. Notification failures happen. But the decision to wipe a missing government device, knowing that doing so would render it untraceable and its contents unrecoverable, at the precise moment when those contents were the subject of active parliamentary and legal scrutiny, is not a clerical error. It is a choice. And choices have authors. Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. He has not said who authorised the wipe. He has not explained why the ICO was not notified. He has not said whether anyone in Downing Street attempted to track the device before wiping it. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark. These are not difficult questions. They have simple, factual answers. A government with nothing to hide would have provided them already. The country is still waiting. "Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. [...]. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark."