HyperHasDied

The 71% white figure for CSAM viewership comes from data with a fundamental flaw baked into it before you even start analyzing it. The FBI's UCR system and most federal reporting mechanisms routinely classify Hispanic and Latino offenders as white, which is a well documented and widely acknowledged problem in criminology. That white number is already artificially inflated by tens of millions of people who aren't non-Hispanic white before anyone draws a single conclusion from it. And it's not just Hispanics. Black offenders also get miscategorized as white in certain reporting systems and jurisdictions, not at the same scale as Hispanics but it happens with enough frequency to further compromise the data. So the white figure is being padded from multiple directions simultaneously while the actual non-Hispanic white numbers get obscured. Viewing data is also some of the least reliable crime data that exists. VPNs, shared networks, institutional IP addresses, and attribution problems make clean racial breakdowns nearly impossible. You're building a sweeping racial narrative on some of the shakiest numbers in the entire dataset. But what really shits on this narrative is contact offenses against children, meaning actual physical sexual abuse, molestation, and assault, are a completely different category with considerably more reliable data and those numbers tell an entirely different story. The Bureau of Justice Statistics documents significant Black overrepresentation in sexual offenses against children including contact abuse and molestation. The National Crime Victimization Survey corroborates this. And those numbers exist even after the miscategorization issue has already padded the white figures upward. Then stack the broader violent crime picture on top. Over 50% of homicides, over 50% of robberies, massive overrepresentation in aggravated assault etc, all documented in federal data, all in a reporting system simultaneously undercounting by misclassifying offenders into the white category. You found the one data category using the least reliable methodology that breaks the pattern and built an entire goofy racial argument on it while ignoring an ocean of contradictory data. Correct the miscategorization, apply honest per capita analysis, and the viewing statistic almost certainly joins every other category and the other categories would get even worse.

After assaulting a girl in the street, he was stopped by a group of Jiu-Jitsu practitioners who held him until the police arrived. The classic ending: playing the victim and claiming, “I can’t breathe”… as usual.

When is the IP pulling going to happen besides you blocking people and saying you did something? As someone who actually works around computers a lot, I know you can't get anything meaningful from an IP anyway. The most you could realistically do is attempt a DDoS and hit someone offline for a short period, and even that's a stretch since most home connections sit behind NAT and ISP-level protections that make basic DDoS attempts far less effective than people think unless you pay for some underground shitty stress tester and I highly doubt you know enough about tech to make your own let alone a botnet for one. The only way to get any actually relevant info is having a contact at an ISP or in law enforcement, and I don't think you do. If you did, using that to dox someone over a Twitter argument would be wildly illegal, so I doubt that's actually the case here. Either way, you genuinely can't do anything beyond maybe a short-term disconnect, and I doubt even that goes through cleanly. You also can't IP pull someone via Twitter unless you've got a zero day exploit or some unknown vulnerability, and if you actually had that you wouldn't be wasting it threatening "racists" online. Even if you somehow did get an IP, city and state-level geolocation from it is rarely accurate, and that's the most you'd get, assuming the person isn't on a VPN, which makes the whole thing pointless anyway. And even in the best case scenario where you had full legal access to ISP subscriber records, that only ties to whoever's name is on the account, not necessarily who was using the device. Without a first and last name or a phone number to actually cross-reference, a city and an ISP name isn't identification and 95% of the time you are only getting the state, it's nothing. That's also exactly why basic opsec, a VPN, a separate email, not reusing usernames, not posting identifying details, shuts this whole threat down before it even starts.