Kenny

Open challenge to any flat earther: If you can provide one piece of verifiable and repeatable empirical evidence that earth is flat, I will admit earth is flat, delete my account and never return to Twitter. This needs to be a repeatable measurement, not “looks flat”.

@Copernicium1473 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok $20 says she has to look up how helium is produced 🤣

@trin357 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Plant life doesn't produce helium. So thank you for making it clear that you didn't learn basic biology in either high school or junior high.

How many pages it takes to “math up” a globe vs. how many pages to demonstrate and explain the simplicity of Earth being measured flat.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok They don’t stack in layers, but RDD is density sorting that would stack gases in layers with lighter gases on top. 🥴 You couldn’t even finish the sentence without contradicting yourself.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Gases don’t stack in layers, they spread out in all directions, starting from bottom where gases are produced within the ground by plant life and dissipates, and the lighter gases go up higher due to RDD, which you hijacked as “grabbity gravity”.🫤

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok So you can’t explain the mechanics required for your claim to be true. Noted.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok You can THINK that but you will never be able to demonstrate it.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok You don’t know any physics. Provide the formula that best describes the density gradient in the atmosphere. That is physical and can absolutely be described with math. Let’s see how much you know.

@Copernicium1473 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok The conceptual is more your speed. I was taught actual physics… the one dealing with the PHYSICal and material world.

@Copernicium1473 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Anything that brings to question her understanding of physics is a red herring, mostly because such an understanding doesn’t exist and she needs some way to obfuscate.

@trin357 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok It's not a red herring, and I don't think you know what a red herring is. My question to you is did your high school conceptual physics class actually teach any physics at all?

I’m not wrong. For gas to not expand, it requires a force to act on it. Nothing you mentioned would prevent gas from filling a container due to kinetic energy. You don’t understand gas behavior and rely on what idiots told you, and you can’t do anything to validate your argument other than string together absolutely meaningless nonsense. “It’s a system of systems” it doesn’t explain anything or create a mechanism that provides the observed pressure gradient. Now, provide whatever force is acting on the gas to create a pressure gradient and its predictive formula and we can see if it matches reality. That’s how science works. Not by saying “there is a heat source and water cycles so it magically happens”.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok It does fill the container. It just doesn't equalize the way air in a jar would. The Earth is a system of systems, gas and water cycles, heating source, temperature changes, winds(caused by high & low air pressures), precipitation... You simply are wrong.

Nope. You said it would expand and fill its container. Measurably not happening. Your hypothesis is null. Air pressure is measurably 0.000015 psi at 60 miles altitude and 14.7 at sea level. Something is clearly holding the air to earth and it cannot be a physical barrier as pressure would equalize.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok There’d be no pressure there to measure without a container.

@Copernicium1473 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok And being super religious. Only state of the 40+ I’ve been to that has “Jesus Loves You” billboards all over the place. Between the two, she was likely doomed.

@ItsNotFlat603 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok The reason I ask her is because it is North Carolina, and southern states are known for having some very poor public school systems.

@Copernicium1473 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok She abandoned everything she learned for the word of the great Nathan Oakley. Look at his brilliant work in science dropbox.com/scl/fi/fyyiyaa…

@trin357 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok And you are wrong. Trin, did your high school conceptual physics class actually teach any physics at all?

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok You not understanding how it debunks your claim is what is laughable. If we reach zero PSI before a barrier, what good is a barrier beyond that point? It can’t be pressing against nothing and creating pressure.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Not once. Your fan blowing example is laughable.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok On earth, gases are measured not to act as you claim. We reach zero psi before a barrier. As there is nothing pressing from above, your assertion is dismissed. You also did not answer my question.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Relativity is just a mathematical theory! Entropy is not stopped, prevented, halted, or decreased. When it comes to gases, they spread out in all directions. That’s natural law. To form pressure, they need a container to press against.

@TBRagsdale1 @atensnut The flow rate of the filtration system has always been insufficient. It’s a giant pool that is supposed to appear dead calm. It’s always going to have flow rate issues. Painting it an even darker color isn’t going to help.

@atensnut Well here we are. MAGA gone full idiot.

It appears very evident that the reflection pool has been sabotaged. The left is evil.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok I asked you a specific question. Provide a specific answer. Thank you.

@Copernicium1473 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Gas pressure requires a container. The whole relativity/spacetime theory violates that.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok His vocabulary is far superior to your own

@Copernicium1473 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok You need to expand your vocabulary.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok We have, countless times. You can reach zero PSI before you reach a physical barrier. Done deal. No container needed.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok You could always prove gas pressure doesn’t require a container…

Again, they are two separate operations. If you did not correct for the measured curvature, elevations would be wrong. The instance below is a perfect example. If you did not correct for curvature, the building would read as being 16’ tall, as it is zero degrees elevation from a point at 16’ ASL. When you apply it to the WGS84 datum, the height is correct.

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok If a straight reference plane can be used to measure curvature, then the curvature would be measured therefore no need to correct for the measurements in the mathematics (maGics).

@Copernicium1473 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok That and they think it’s some get out of jail free card

@ItsNotFlat603 @trin357 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok I swear that flerfs like to use the Second Law of Thermodynamics because it uses big words.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Level is measurably curving. You cannot change measurable reality with a definition. Your appeal to authority fallacy is noted

@ItsNotFlat603 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok You missed it again. This is about the fact that all elevations are measured FROM a LEVEL surface. That’s the “cat out of the bag” since everyone, except you zealots, knows that level means horizontal! The emphasis is on the SURFACE. Elevations are vertical.

@trin357 @Copernicium1473 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok In which specific isolated system, and using which precise relativistic transformation for temperature/entropy, does relativity predict a spontaneous decrease in total entropy?

@Copernicium1473 @ItsNotFlat603 @xyphophor @ken_caudle @grok Relativity violates natural laws, including the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

@WheresWal11y @GypsyRose_onX Exactly. None of them can.

@ItsNotFlat603 @GypsyRose_onX Big idiot who can’t scale

There has never been a single proof of a globe presented 😎 Only CGI composites that nasa freely admits are created with graphic software 😲🤣