Null

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 ATF unable to match bullet in Charlie Kirk case to rifle linked to suspect Tyler Robinson, court filing reveals.

Wow. No sh*t.

👀 GLENN GREENWALD: “In the Republican Party, there's going to be a major candidate — I am certain. I hope it's Tucker … You know, stranger things have happened.”

🚨 BOMBSHELL REPORT: Thomas Massie's in-state financial support is rapidly DECLINING, while out-of-state & leftist financial support is SURGING. This spells trouble for him in May's upcoming primary! It's often brought up that Thomas Massie has a suspiciously small percentage of in-state financial support this election cycle. So, I was curious if it was always this small of a percentage? The answer is NO, & minus his first re-election bid, his in-state financial support has been rapidly declining, especially during the Trump years. Not a good sign for Massie! Percentage of in-state support by cycle: ✔️ 2011-2012: 52% ✔️ 2013-2014: 58% ✔️ 2015-2016: 44% ✔️ 2017-2018: 44% ✔️ 2019-2020: 29% ✔️ 2021-2022: 22% ✔️ 2023-2024: 12% ✔️ 2025-2026 (so far): 5% All of these figures were calculated by Grok, which used sites like OpenSecrets & FEC, where all donor locations are visible. 5% is a really low number, especially for a 6-time incumbent, but I wanted to confirm this is normal, so I asked Grok what the standard average percentage of in-state financial support for incumbent members of Congress. For the 2023-2024 cycle, the House Incumbent average of in-state financial support was 57.72%, while the Senate was 31.72%. You'll also notice the major drop in in-state financial support from the 2017-2018 to the 2019-2020 cycle. In 2019, Thomas Massie voted YES on H. J. Res 46 to overturn President Trump's usage of emergency funds to build the wall at the border. He voted along with a dozen other republicans & the Democrats. Another huge dip occurred during the 2023-2024 cycle, where he endorsed Governor Ron DeSantis over President Trump for President in 2024, then at the last minute, gave Trump a tepid Twitter endorsement, which rubbed people the wrong way, especially since he gave such a loud, glowing endorsement to Ron DeSantis, & all Trump got from him was a Twitter post. Finally, in this current cycle, that 12% dipped to 5%, because he started bucking Trump at every turn when it mattered most, voting against him on important bills like One Big Beautiful Bill, Take it Down Act & other huge bills that involved funding DHS, ICE, & strengthening our border's security. He also aligned with the Squad on a lot of issues, did a lot of leftist media tours, tormenting Trump on X, running around with Ro Khanna, all of which lead to him going from over a decade of receiving ZERO from leftists, to that 0% sharply rising to 79% of his financial donors also backing Democrats or Democrat PACS. I broke the story of the 79% figure on March 1st (screenshot included) , & had to pull the original version of this post, because some loser noted it without reading it, then got Massie Nasties to vote it up. The Daily Caller article was published weeks later. That doesn't make this figure any less correct. This is why Democrats want Massie to stay in his seat, because he does their bidding & he is their top useful idiot. Grok calculated this figure searching through Thomas Massie's donors on OpenSecrets & FEC, where donors' donation histories are publicly available. It's safe to say Thomas Massie is not nearly as popular in his district as X would lead you to believe that he is. He went from over 50% down to 5% during his entire time in Congress. No moneybomb is going to get him out of this hole he dug himself into. Moneybombs are largely for out-of-state donors, who aren't eligible to vote for Thomas Massie in May's upcoming primary.

Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson called White people colonizers, and said Black people deserve reparations. “I believe we can call for Black liberation and reparations.”