Key Led

@Allin4Freedom @Inadvertantview @FalkTG It’s simply unbelievable that you’re even capable of reading a graphic, but I’ll at least congratulate you on that 🙏

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG “NATO partners pay for these security guarantees” 🙄🙄 Excuse me, who the hell do you think pays for NATO?

Truth nuke for Europe 🇪🇺: From a military standpoint, American security guarantees are worth 10 times more than French ones. America is - by far - our most valuable ally. We should treat them as such.

@TMartelli3 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG Oh right, maybe you should start electing people who don’t spend years pissing themselves with champagne and blowing “our” money on islands with kids, then you might actually get something out of your military too, you damn moron.

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG How did the "Russians" force all of Europe to act like douchebags? You fucktards have been living large because of Americas largess. You are all fucking grifting frauds whos opinions Mean NOTHING to Americans now. GFYS!

We don’t give a damn about your opinion, you didn’t pay for anything at all, you ungrateful piece of shit, we paid for security guarantees that aren’t worth anything under Trump and MAGA, and for that we neglected our military. And now fuck off back to your range and read a book about the causal connections of a hegemonic power and its lackeys.

1/5 🚨 Ist Deutschland Russlands wahres Ziel? 🇩🇪🇷🇺 Der estnische Sicherheitsexperte Erkki Koort warnt im Baltic Sentinel: Wir schauen in die falsche Richtung. Während der Westen einen Angriff auf das Baltikum fürchtet, ist das eigentliche „leichte Ziel“ für den Kreml ein ganz anderes: Deutschland.

@KennethJolivet @FurkanGozukara

@FurkanGozukara Liars lie. Go on, tell the truth. Trump has exposed NATO and Europe, all in one test

Absolute humiliation for the White House. France 24 exposes how Trump begged NATO to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, got completely rejected because Europe refuses to fight his disastrous war, and is now throwing a tantrum threatening to leave NATO. Total strategic collapse.

@DavidD_Chapman “Maybe the Chinese will also pay you a visit, right at your home, who knows 🤣”

Withdraw from NATO and withdraw all US troops from US bases in Europe and see how many days it takes Russia to conquer Europe.

@ssavage0914 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG “Speaking from the most bankrupt country in the world 🤣 Donny is going to crash the whole train into the wall at full speed much earlier.” Pure comedy

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG You bring zero to the table What - more expensive olive oil? You won’t even be a global player in ten years

@Inst_decay @LASPORTSFANATIC @Inadvertantview @FalkTG That means we are the fucking private army of the orange? Not even the American people support this war.

@KeyLed71340 @LASPORTSFANATIC @Inadvertantview @FalkTG WERE THE ONES PROTECTING YOU FROM RUSSIAN WITH OUR NUKES YOU FUCKING DUMG FUCK

@LASPORTSFANATIC @Inadvertantview @FalkTG When I walk through the city here, all I see are American companies only. What kind of freedom do you think that’s going to be? 😂 My God, how can someone have such an incredibly tiny microcosm? Is that really a problem of education?

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG Your entire continent is by definition a protectorate. Enjoy what happens next

@LASPORTSFANATIC @Inadvertantview @FalkTG Your tax money? We’re the ones shoving that money up your ass, for security guarantees that are worthless under Trump. Your president is not respected by the rest of the world at all, and that’s not exactly the world’s fault.

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG European nations tariffed the fuck out of US goods Openly disrespected our President US pays nato budget and gives security guarantees and funds your defense and has paid for the Ukraine war budget Europe gives nothing of value to the US. You are a parasite on our taxpayers

Hmm, wait a second… German soldiers are stationed in Lithuania, even after 2022. If all these investments and gifts to the USA had been put into our own armament, we wouldn’t now have to rely on someone who can only “deter” and who wages wars against countries that are still living in the Middle Ages. I’ve been saying this for years: independence from this system, independence for Europe… and that’s why I wouldn’t hesitate for a single second to defend the USA at its border against the Chinese.

Ah, a German chimes in. Yes, someone from a country that pre-eminently funded the Russian war machine deserves to lecture others. But if Russia does come for Western Europe you know they’ll have to chew through the Ukrainians and the Poles first. Everyone else paying the price for dumb German decisions.

You just don’t understand me, I couldn’t care less whether your soldiers are running around here or not. I’ve been in favor for years of Europe investing much more in its own defense and becoming independent from the USA, because I know that the U.S. pays for all these investments out of our pocket. You never do anything for free, and you never have. You were only able to build up this massive presence because we paid for it. That’s the point, and that’s why there won’t be any withdrawal from NATO, because you’re being taken for fools.

Literally nothing you can say penetrates their thick skulls.

@supercalifrag33 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG (We)🤣 10.000 MAGA Bots on X

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG You are truly stupid. It's not your fault, though. It's your government's fault. Good luck. We're done with you.

@supercalifrag33 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG The bots picked up that president, Most people like you reject his policies, MAGA has lost, just like Trump has lost on tariffs, Iran and the Epstein files, he just doesn’t win that often. The whole world, unfortunately, has to bear the consequences.

No. And you can keep your "love," propaganda lover. I don't think Europeans get this: we're not like you, even though we descend from the same ancestors. We are built different and we like ourselves that way, unlike Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, who pander to you all rather than leaning into their frontier/pioneer settler histories. We are citizens, not subjects. We value our rugged individualism. We do not take orders from anyone. We picked that president because he reflects our values. You just don't like us or our values. Get over it.

@FreenBraveStar @Inadvertantview @FalkTG And, of course you never heard about that🤣

@FreenBraveStar @Inadvertantview @FalkTG That’s true - besides, it’s not really a European problem anymore 🤷‍♂️ I mean, it’s not like it has any real significance for Europe at this point anyway…

@backcountryMAGA @Inadvertantview @FalkTG The men who stormed Omaha Beach would knock your teeth out for the fascist MAGA nonsense you’re spreading today. So don’t you dare wrap yourself in their legacy, you’re dragging their names through the mud.

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG She did you ever ask for our help?????!!! LMFAO LMFAO OMFG OMFG this man practically begged us to help, and was happy Japan attacked us because he knew America would finally join the war.

A bilateral trade surplus number completely misses the point I was making. Security guarantees and alliance structures don’t show up as a neat “subsidy” line, they change the overall size and composition of trade and investment. Empirically, when the U.S. extends security commitments, its trade with those partners grows well beyond what you’d predict from GDP, distance, and tariffs alone, when those commitments are cut back, models estimate a hit on U.S. trade and GDP on the order of several hundred billion a year, regardless of whether the U.S. has a surplus or a deficit with any single partner. In other words: the 200b surplus is just an accounting snapshot, the question is how much total trade and output exists because the security architecture you’re now dismissing made those flows safe, stable and scalable in the first place.

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG Lol you guys have a $200b trade surplus with us we aren’t getting some imaginary $500b trade subsidy you mentioned earlier.

@backcountryMAGA @Inadvertantview @FalkTG When did we ever ask for your help, you miserable remedial-case? You installed this system here after WWII and profited from it for decades, you completely degenerate brain‑fart.

@KeyLed71340 @Inadvertantview @FalkTG Fuck off freeloader. We’re done defending your shit hole countries.

You’re basically just restating textbook trade theory and skipping the empirical part. Yes, international trade is mutually beneficial, but the level of that trade doesn’t fall from the sky. Security guarantees reduce political and economic risk, stabilize expectations, and make countries predictable enough for investment and long‑term contracts in the first place. That’s exactly why trade and foreign direct investment end up far higher than what you’d expect from “pure market forces” in a world without those security anchors, and why rolling back those guarantees wouldn’t just change the symbolism, but would measurably wipe out hundreds of billions in trade volume and economic output.

The concept of a "trade gift" is an oxymoron in global economics. International trade is a mutually beneficial exchange of goods, services, and capital. When NATO partners (such as the European Union countries, the UK, or Canada) trade with the U.S., they are buying American products or selling their own products to American consumers and businesses. These are transactional exchanges driven by market demand, not charitable donations subsidizing the U.S. GDP. While it is true that trade with allied nations is incredibly valuable and generates hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity, it is a two-way street that benefits the economies of all participating nations.