@MentisWave @dixiedean_ I appreciate Lindsay, but now he often sees ghosts where there aren't.
One of the woke's biggest danger is that it makes us all paranoid.
English
Lord Gooser
5.3K posts
@dixiedean_ Which is also very different from how Marx defines class. Hoppe started that essay this way to bait Marxists into reading it, and here Lindsay is taking the intro at face value while not reading it.
Completely embarrassing.
English
@Arto2077 @Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee They don't justify it now, because they no longer make sense.
It's like we get the technological means for the kids to emancipate at 3 and then the intellectuals of the 25th century say that our society was oppresive towards kids.
English
@LordGooser @Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee We are talking about domination. If what you're saying is true, then still responsibilities don't justify domination
English
Le féminisme c'est pas refuser la maternité. C'est aider celles qui la vivent, et foutre la paix à celles qui la refusent. Le féminisme, c'est le choix.
Declaration of Memes@LibertyCappy
How to break feminist propaganda with one simple video:
Français
@neezjutzzzz @IDEpuisee I don't think "authorising" counts as offering them choices.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee "I see that you're complaining about a systemic issue. Have you considered making better personal choices?"
English
@Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee Men never had the freedom to choose how they lived, they had responsabilities and often had to sacrifice themselves for their families, there has never been a society oppresive only to women,
And we have records of women owning property and even voting before suffragism.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee Yet men had power, money, and the freedom to choose how they lived. Women weren’t even allowed to imagine that. Men could own property, hold office, travel, study, inherit, and decide their own lives. Someone else’s 'freedom to choose' only feels odd when you’re used to privilege
English
@ukiddingmehuh @IDEpuisee Of course the west isn't the center, the places were social conditions are still harsh and unproductive we still see family units witg strict norms.
And the places with productive economies can allow individuals to be free, there we see woman as political beings themselves.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee but ur idea about of “family” is also simplistic, u need to know about social conditions in most of third world countries at that time and what culture and system they were holding because not all places had an effect of industrial revolution and western wasn’t the center
English
@Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee No, men were not privileged, being the head of the family never meant having absolute power, it meant that men were responsible for the family's wellbeing, if women commited a crime for, like, unpaying a debt, men were responsible and could face jail, this ended with capitalism.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee Very recent doesn’t mean nonexistent. Women were restricted while men held the power, stop dressing that up. And calling oppression “shared sacrifice” doesn’t make it equal, you guys go way too far to justify oppression
English
@ukiddingmehuh @IDEpuisee Your idea of "patriarchy" is absolutley simplistic.
The standart model of the family is not a one-directed oppresion, but rather a disciplined mutual protection that went obsolete after the industrial revolution, that's why we now see it as "oppresive" towards women.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee but traditional conservatives ppl said otherwise, there’s many systems but still lean to one thing, “patriarchy”, thank god that’s why now we have a choice to change it
English
@ChoujinVirus @Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee Of course, this exchange stopped making sense after the industrial revolution, but it shows that gender roles are not just an arbitrary construct of a tyrant privileged man, even in Islam, men loves theur wives (2/2)
English
@ChoujinVirus @Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee Their lifes in wars and risky jobs.
There is this anthropological theory were roles were build on a mutual exchange of protection-status, were men sacrifice their lives for women while women gave them obedience in exchange. (1/2)
English
English
@LordGooser @Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee "never been a society where women's freedom were restricted"
Didn't folks like you complain about the Arabic world's treatement of women?
English
@ukiddingmehuh @IDEpuisee If that is the problem then the solution is not to "authorize" as if you were the new boss.
And that is a reductionist view, there has never been a "system" that forced you to do anything, tje world before the industrial revolution was not a "free choice world" for anybody.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee do u see the key “authorized” it means women should have a choice for being a mother or not, the problem is the system that forced women to be someone they’re not want to be
English
@Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee The concept of rights is very recent.
there has never been a society where women's freedoms were restricted but men's freedoms were respected.
Every restriction of women's freedoms were accompanied by men's sacrifices and responsabilities.
You are falling into reducrionism.
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee Loving? Lol. Do you even know what love means?
The same “loving” family that denied women education, property rights, voting, bank accounts, and any real say, pushed early marriage, enforced obedience, and treated them like they existed only to serve. So loving, I see!
English
@Rain_afrodity @IDEpuisee Ah yes, having a loving family, umbearable oppresion
English
@LordGooser @IDEpuisee She is not a god, lol. Radical oppression gives birth to radical rebellion.
English
@ReyesLarin @agusantonetti Aquí tienes, las dos encuestas existentes, la actual y la actualizada.
Español
@LordGooser @agusantonetti Si, hubo cambios a fines de 2023, Googlea, sin ofender.
Español
🇺🇸🇦🇷 Histórico apoyo del Washington Post al gobierno de Javier Milei en Argentina.
- Milei ha logrado reducir la pobreza del 53% al 28% aplicando las ideas del libre mercado, demostrando otra vez la superioridad de las ideas frente al socialismo.
"El experimento de libre mercado de Argentina, impulsado por el presidente Javier Milei, ha desafiado una vez más a los agoreros", escribe el Consejo Editorial.
"Las cifras publicadas esta semana por la agencia estadística del país muestran un descenso drástico en la tasa de pobreza."
El mejor gobierno de toda América Latina.
Español
@ReyesLarin @agusantonetti Es que efectivamente tanto plan social se financiaba por impresión de dinero, lo de que la pobreza mejoró por planes sociales es una mentira que os habéis sacado de la manga.
Y no ha habido cambios en la encuesta de hogares, se sigue usando la de 2004, que está descatualizada.
Español
@LordGooser @agusantonetti Pero no es lo que se juzgaba a los K, de planeros y que la economía era mala por tantos planes sociales? A finales de 2023 se introducen cambios en la encuesta de hogares y se captan los ingresos no laborales (planes) y mejora el índice de pobreza. Ahí una respuesta
Español
@ReyesLarin @agusantonetti Si era tan fácil como aunentar los planes sociales ¿por qué Alberto permitió que la pobreza subiese al 40% sin más? ¿No había simplemente que subir planes sociales? ¿No es este el eslogan principal del Kirchnerismo en toda su historia? ¿Funcionan solo con Milei?
Español
@agusantonetti Claro, lo que no saben es que este experimento tiene más planes sociales que Alberto en pandemia.
Sueldos de mierda pisados hace más de 2 años que la inflación los supera ampliamente
Español