nation timire

@RvN1776 @OnsOranje Best lucky our legend

Back at the national team to prepare for the World Cup. 🦁

@_onlyscott Al Nassar

Guess the football club? 👀 Level: HARD

@_onlyscott Netherlands

Guess the national team? 👀 Level: HARD

@IRMilitaryMedia @grok enlighten me

ARE YOU READY?

@AVFC_Connor_ Fulham stadium, Eland if im not mistaken

If you know football, tell me who’s stadium this is…

@IranToday_24 @grok ,comment on this

Breaking News🚨🇮🇷After Trump forced oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz and claimed to have wiped out the entire Iranian naval fleet, the response came from an unexpected quarter—an Iranian strike on an American oil tanker attempting to cross the strait🔥It seems that the naval battles have begun‼️

@mosesgives Khedira

GUESS THE MISSING PLAYER? Winner gets $500

@_CFCWhizz England

Guess the national team VERY HARD

@KingTunde_SZN 2

Who is a Billionaire?🤔 Correct answer deserve $500.

@OfficialJoel4_ B

$DIFFICULTY VERY HARD This is tricky, identify Donald Trump mouth! Which one is it? Correct answer wins $300

@MrAbviews 14

@ejykmykel1 @grok is this tru or just propaganda

ONLY 80 PILOTS ARE QUALIFIED TO FLY THIS B2 . ITS A NIGHT MARE.

@elonmuskFatZo 22 people , and 30 dead bodies , to be precise

@_mamozeze_ Kkkkkkkkkkkk

I'd rather walk to Bulawayo 😭

@MufcFreQuency He is versatile, though inconsistent

Never thought that I will ever in my entire life enjoy watching Dalot play.👏

@TheFLZone Adoring was bewitched by the dead

🗣️ Ruben Amorim: "Harry Amass is struggling in the Championship" Harry Amass in the Championship:

@Utdcen Rojo

97% of Manchester United fans don't know this player Prove me wrong ✍️

@cozwva Jkkkkkkkkkki

This is not good for our very own Themba Magorimbo, if Americans no longer needs his services, they should know haana kusiya apisa musha. Anodzoka zvake 😭😭😭😭😭😭

@chriswrld233 Why do tou mean by "2UP"?

My weekend predictions Newcastle vs Burnley Home – 2UP Olympiacos vs OFI Crete Over 1.5 Feyenoord vs PEC Zwolle Over 1.5 Real Madrid vs Celta Home – 2UP CD Tondela vs Porto Away – 2UP Buriram United vs Kanchanaburi Power FC Over 1.5 WKW ETO FC Gyor vs Kazincbarcikai SC Over 1.5 FK Spartak 1918 Varna vs PFC Levski Sofia Over 1.5 Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs Shonan Bellmare Over 1.5 Ferencvarosi Budapest vs Kisvarda FC Home – 1UP AEK Athens vs Atromitos Athinon Over 1.5 Barcelona vs Osasuna Over 1.5 FK Zenit Saint Petersburg vs FK Akron Tolyatti Over 1.5 Bayern Munich vs Mainz Over 2.5 ADO Den Haag vs FC Emmen Over 1.5 Man City vs Sunderland AFC Over 1.5 FC CSKA 1948 vs PFC Dobrudzha Dobrich Over 1.5 PSG vs Rennes Home – 1UP

@lilomatic Profound

🟣 STATEMENT ON THE 17-YEAR-OLD BOY & THE MEMORY MAKEDENGE CASE: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS The story circulating about a 17-year-old boy and Memory Makedenge has triggered emotional, sensational, and sometimes uninformed reactions. As a leader, feminist, and human-rights advocate, my position must be rooted in law, child-protection principles, and ethical clarity. Below is the balanced, factual analysis Zimbabwe needs right now. 1️⃣ The first principle: A 17-year-old is STILL A CHILD under Zimbabwean law Even if he is physically mature… Even if he “appears to enjoy”… Even if social media thinks he “participated”… THE LAW IS NOT BASED ON SOCIAL MEDIA INTERPRETATIONS OF A VIDEO. Under Zimbabwe’s Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act: A 17-year-old is a minor. A minor cannot legally give full, valid consent to sexual intercourse with an adult. So what happened can not be classified as “consensual sex” in the eyes of the law no matter how it looks on video. 2️⃣ Is it “rape”? People are shouting “rape,” but we must be accurate. Under Section 65, rape is defined as penile–vaginal penetration of a female without consent. The law is outdated and gender-specific. Therefore: ❌ A woman can't be charged with “rape” under Section 65 for having intercourse with a male. But this does NOT mean the act is legal. 3️⃣ So what crime is it? Under Zimbabwean law, the appropriate charge for an adult woman engaging in sex with a 17-year-old boy is: ✅ Section 70: Sexual Intercourse with a Young Person This offence applies even when: the minor “agrees,” the minor “participates,” or the minor appears “willing.” The law presumes power imbalance, immaturity, and vulnerability and therefore protects minors regardless of appearances. This is the legal framework Parliament gave us. 4️⃣ How do we interpret the boy’s “cooperation” in the tape? Some are saying: “He enjoyed.” “He was patting her back.” “He was participating.” These arguments are common, but they are both legally irrelevant and psychologically uninformed. 🔹 Minors frequently cooperate in situations they don’t fully understand. 🔹 Cooperation ≠ consent. 🔹 Enjoyment ≠ legality. 🔹 Physical reaction ≠ mental agreement. Worldwide, MANY male victims of abuse: Appear cooperative, Appear aroused, Appear physically responsive, even while being manipulated, groomed, or pressured. This is a well-documented psychological phenomenon. So Zimbabwe must be careful not to weaponise a boy’s behaviour against him, that is victim-blaming, and it discourages boys from reporting abuse. 5️⃣ The Real Debate Zimbabwe Must Have What this case exposes is a deeper national truth: 🔥 Zimbabwe has never seriously confronted sexual abuse of boys by women. 🔥 Society wrongly assumes “a boy can not be abused if he is aroused.” 🔥 Our laws still treat sexual violence through a gendered, outdated lens. 🔥 Boys are shamed into silence because of toxic masculinity. This case is forcing us to talk about what we have ignored for decades. 6️⃣ MY BALANCED CONCLUSION ✔️ Legally: This is not rape under Section 65, but it IS a criminal offence under Section 70 (Sexual Intercourse with a Young Person). ✔️ Ethically: Minors deserve protection, regardless of gender. An adult woman should NEVER have sexual involvement with a 17-year-old boy. ✔️ Socially: We must stop turning child-protection issues into jokes or memes simply because the victim is a boy. ✔️ Politically: Zimbabwe needs legal reform, so rape is defined gender-neutrally, based on consent, not anatomy. Both boys and girls must be equally protected.