Not Applicable

@SlingPoppin @S1ria_1 @sh0kobara You must not understand what ambiguity means. It means you reserve judgment. If it ever turned out uraume identified as non binary then so be it. But ambiguity exists right now.

@NotApplica49649 @S1ria_1 @sh0kobara they also use this same narrative ambiguity for kirara when megumi and panda didn't know kirara transitioned right?

these two could slap a big fat "I'm trans" sticker on their foreheads and people would still deny it

@fznutri Niether

🟥 or 🟩?

Turning real-life poses into raw sketches! 🟥🟩

@cabbagelover307 💀 lack of evidence=/evidence of lack You don’t have to default to anything. As I said, reserved judgement. You don’t have to act like your HC is anything but a HC.

@NotApplica49649 They never expressed attraction for only one gender and if they didnt they also do not fit the criteria to be aroace As Maki said in season 1, her lover would “have to be stronger than her at the very least”, she never said it HAD to be a man, or it HAD to be a woman+

jjk queer spectrum hc may be subject to change BTW i put mai in bi because canonically she showed attraction to 2 genders but she has a fem preference imo

@cabbagelover307 You are the party making a claim. Therefore I would like to hear your justification of it.

@cabbagelover307 I’m not saying they are. Personally, I’d reserve judgement until more information is given, which ofc it likely never will be.

@Arealmfngl Why doesn’t anyone in the comments seem to realize this is a real kink

ild rather my son grow up to be a criminal then a nigga like this

@DKTRBATZ This is what we call an analogy. I said I teach people I see as having potential. I never said I teach people how to teach other people based on potential. You’re mistakenly taking the former to mean the latter.

@DKTRBATZ To put it in simpler terms, you created the idea of two roads. I told you I drive down one road a certain way. But you’re taking that to mean I drive down both roads that way.

im not the best artist in the world but heres how i would break this down (quickly and not very detailed lol)

@DKTRBATZ In other words, you’re straw manning me out of using a distinction you created. You distinguish between A. Teaching people directly and B. teaching you how to teach people. I told you that I have a standard of selectivity for A, but you’re trying to necessarily apply it B.

@DKTRBATZ I already told you that I selectively teach people. And bc you already distinguished teaching ppl from teaching you how to teach ppl, my potential based selectivity that applies to teaching people doesn’t necessarily apply when teaching others how to teach people.

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo And as I told you earlier, I don’t care what your personal reasons for spreading misinformation are.

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo well you dont need to tell me how to teach people because as i told you earlier i dont intend to be an art teacher.

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo You seem to be ignoring your own distinction. You said I should teach ppl myself, rather than teaching you how to teach ppl. But now you’re conflating the two to make it seem like I’m not operating within your distinction and referring to teaching ppl myself.

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo wait so if you only wanna teach people you see potential in, why are you critiquing me for spreading misinformation? wouldnt you think that the individuals taking said misinformation as gospel perhaps dont have much potential?

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo I understood what your latest comment said but I’m still pushing back on your previous comments despite your alleged clarification. x.com/NotApplica4964…

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo you are not understanding me lol i dont care about your critique of mine im saying it would be a better use of your time to do what i did, show people how you would break down the photo, if you care so much about teaching people properly.

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo As for teaching people in general, it’s not really my thing. I pick and choose who I want to teach mostly based on who I see potential in.

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo I suppose in this instance I didn’t redraw your redraw because I see my words as sufficient. But you seem to be saying they’re not, so again, what is difficult to visualize about my critique?

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo Interesting pivot. What about my critique in your opinion is difficult to visualize? Why must I draw it out?

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo yknow what wouldve been more productive? if you had done your own guideline example to show people how YOU wouldve done it! instead of arguing with me, no one is going to see this and care. if you wanna teach art, go teach, be free.

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo We’re all operating on an implicit normative art standard, otherwise you wouldnt have given a critique bc thered be nothing to fix relative to the lack of a standard. So as I pointed out, your critique was flawed relative to this standard. Youre improperly teaching. Misinforming.

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo what is misinformation? drawing in a particular way you dont like? drawing in a way you deem incorrect? that is not misinformation as drawing is no fact.

@DKTRBATZ @JusLovesHyo Okay? That’s irrelevant to me. You posted misinformation and I corrected it, I don’t care if you only post misinformation when you aren’t serious.

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo you already did though? i was trying to explain that usually yes id take those things into account if i was going to actually make a finished product and not just quickly sketch over something for an example

@Wormny @JusLovesHyo @DKTRBATZ Crazy my girth is bigger than their length

@NotApplica49649 @JusLovesHyo @DKTRBATZ