

Ron7778
8.9K posts





Février 2024 Un article explosif du New York Times, rédigé par Adam Entous et Michael Schwirtz, met en lumière les principaux développements qui ont précédé l’invasion à grande échelle de l’Ukraine. Selon le rapport, le gouvernement ukrainien s’est engagé dans un vaste partenariat avec la CIA contre la Russie. Cette coopération, qui a impliqué l’établissement de 12 « bases d’opérations avancées » secrètes de la CIA le long de la frontière ukrainienne avec la Russie, n’a pas commencé avec l’invasion russe de 2022, mais il y a un peu plus de 10 ans. Quelques jours après la révolution Euromaidan de février 2014, qui a abouti à l’éviction du président Viktor Ianoukovitch et à la mise en place d’un gouvernement résolument pro-occidental, le nouveau chef du Service de sécurité de l’Ukraine (SBU), Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, aurait proposé un « partenariat à trois » avec la CIA et le MI6, le service de renseignement extérieur du Royaume-Uni. Les responsables ukrainiens de la sécurité ont progressivement prouvé leur valeur aux États-Unis en fournissant à la CIA des renseignements sur la Russie, notamment des « documents secrets sur la marine russe », ce qui a conduit à l’établissement de bases de la CIA en Ukraine pour coordonner les activités contre la Russie et à divers programmes de formation pour les commandos ukrainiens et d’autres unités d’élite. Un diplômé de l’un de ces programmes de formation de la CIA, le lieutenant-colonel Kyrylo Budanov, est devenu le chef du renseignement militaire ukrainien. Kiev a régulièrement repoussé les limites de cette relation, violant les lignes rouges de l’administration Obama concernant les opérations meurtrières en assassinant des combattants russes de premier plan sur le territoire contrôlé par les séparatistes alignés sur la Russie. Le partenariat entre Kiev et la CIA s’est approfondi sous l’administration Trump, démentant une fois de plus l’idée sans fondement selon laquelle l’ancien président Trump était d’une certaine manière favorable aux intérêts de la Russie lorsqu’il était en fonction. Comme l’aurait dit Budanov, « il n’a fait que se renforcer. Elle s’est développée de manière systématique. La coopération s’est étendue à d’autres sphères et a pris de l’ampleur. » Cette coopération, comme le souligne minutieusement le Times, est allée bien au-delà de l’aide apportée à l’Ukraine pour se défendre contre la Russie dans un sens étroit et technique – l’Ukraine a plutôt été entraînée dans une coalition occidentale dans le but de mener une vaste guerre de l’ombre contre la Russie. L’exposé du New York Times ne manque pas d’implications inquiétantes. Il va sans dire que l’Ukraine est un État souverain chargé de déterminer ses propres dispositions en matière de sécurité. La question sous-jacente n’est pas de savoir si l’Ukraine a le droit de nouer ce type de relation avec la CIA, ce qui est manifestement le cas, ni si la révolution de Maïdan a mis l’Ukraine sur la voie d’une certaine coopération politique avec des entités occidentales. Il s’agit plutôt d’un problème de perceptions sécuritaires fondamentales. Moscou a averti à plusieurs reprises – pendant de nombreuses années avant 2014 – qu’elle était et restait prête à prendre des mesures drastiques pour empêcher l’Ukraine d’être utilisée par l’Occident comme base opérationnelle avancée contre la Russie. Pourtant, c’est précisément ce qui s’est passé au cours des dix dernières années, comme le raconte le New York Times avec force détails. Le fait que l’Ukraine se soit soumise à cet arrangement non seulement de son plein gré, mais aussi avec enthousiasme, n’a aucune incidence sur les préoccupations essentielles de la Russie. Cette question ne peut pas non plus être entièrement réduite à l’adhésion à l’OTAN : L’Ukraine peut jouer le rôle d’avant-poste anti-russe sur le flanc oriental de l’OTAN sans jamais adhérer officiellement à l’alliance, ce qui est également inacceptable pour le Kremlin. responsiblestatecraft.org/cia-ukraine-ru…




Russian Cold Fusion and Magnetoplane Pioneer - Ivan Stepanovich Filimonenko, 1950s #ufotwitter Ivan Stepanovich Filimonenko, a fascinating and highly controversial figure in Soviet alternative physics. He is best known for his work in the mid-20th century on cold fusion (or electrolytic transmutation) and unorthodox propulsion systems, specifically his proposed "Magnetoplane." 1. Who was Ivan Filimonenko? Filimonenko was a Soviet scientist/engineer who claimed to have discovered a method for cold fusion (low-temperature nuclear reactions) and clean energy generation as early as 1957, decades before Fleischmann and Pons made the concept famous in the West in 1989. According to various accounts, his research received initial backing from high-profile Soviet figures like Academician Igor Kurchatov and Sergey Korolev (the father of the Soviet space program). However, following Kurchatov's death and shifts in political/scientific favor, his projects were shut down, and his work was largely classified or suppressed by the mainstream Soviet Academy of Sciences. The Schematics Explained The composite image blends a few distinct elements to illustrate his theories: The Disc/Cone Craft (Left): This represents the conceptual geometry of the Magnetoplane or a field-propulsion vehicle. The design utilizes a centralized core (often described as a plasma or electrolytic reactor) with broad, circular or disc-like surfaces to manipulate surrounding electromagnetic fields or atmospheric medium. The Russian text "ПОЛЕ" translates directly to "FIELD" (as in an electromagnetic or gravitational field). The Circuit Diagram (Center): This schematic is actually from a later replication attempt and analysis by Western researchers (notably EarthTech International, Inc., dated November 5, 2002). It details an Ohmic/Plasma Experimental Arrangement meant to test electrolytic or plasma-based energy generation. It features: An electrolytic reservoir/heater power setup. Variable transformers and bridge rectifiers to control high-voltage inputs. A cathode/anode setup designed to stimulate the specific thermal/nuclear anomalies Filimonenko claimed to achieve via heavy water electrolysis using palladium or nickel-based cathodes. 3. The Core Technology: Electrolytic Transmutation Filimonenko’s propulsion concepts were intimately tied to his energy concepts. He claimed that by running current through specific electrolytic cells, he could trigger localized nuclear reactions that yielded massive thermal energy and a suppression of hazardous radiation. In theory, this energy would power the intense electromagnetic fields required to ionize the surrounding air or interact with the Earth's magnetic field, achieving lift and propulsion without moving parts. Cold-Fusion Patent as Energy Source For Magnetoplane The patent application detailed in your screenshot (Soviet Author's Certificate No. 717239/38, filed July 27, 1962) is the foundational document for what Filimonenko called his "Thermal Emission Process and System." When you parse the actual physics he was proposing, it becomes clear that this wasn't just a power plant—it was designed to be the internal engine for the Magnetoplane. He was trying to engineer a specific thermodynamic and nuclear loop that tied clean energy, radiation suppression, and thrust into a single mechanism. 1. High-Temperature Electrolytic Fusion While the West's 1989 Fleischmann-Pons model focused on "cold" fusion at room temperature, Filimonenko’s 1962 patent specified an electrolytic reaction operating at high temperatures (around 1000°C). The Medium: Heavy water (D_2O, or deuterium oxide) electrolysis. The Cathode: A solid palladium (Pd) or nickel-palladium alloy matrix. The Mechanism: At 1000°C, the palladium lattice expands, allowing for incredibly high loading ratios of deuterium atoms into the metal matrix. Filimonenko asserted that under these thermal and electrical conditions, the Coulomb barrier (the electrostatic repulsion between atomic nuclei) is overcome, forcing deuterium nuclei to fuse. 2. Aneutronic Clean Energy & "Syntropy" A major roadblock in conventional fusion (D-D or D-T) is the massive release of high-energy neutrons, which degrade materials and require heavy shielding. Filimonenko claimed his system was strictly aneutronic. Instead of producing high-energy neutrons, he claimed the reaction yielded: Helium-3, Helium-4 ), and Tritium. Massive Thermal Power: The patent claims an "over-unity" thermal yield, meaning the heat generated by the nuclear transmutation far exceeded the electrical energy used to maintain the electrolysis. Syntropy vs. Entropy: The patent explicitly mentions "energy concentration" or syntropy. In Filimonenko’s view, the reactor wasn't just burning fuel and creating disorder (entropy); it was actively organizing local thermodynamic and field states, a concept closely linked to Russian theories on torsion fields and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. 3. Radioactivity Suppression (Deactivation) One of the most radical claims in the 1962 certificate—and the reason the Soviet military took notice—was that the reactor's emissions could alter the half-life of radioactive decay and suppress induced radioactivity in nearby materials. Filimonenko claimed that the specific field configurations or coherent polymeric states generated during high-temperature electrolysis could accelerate the decay of hazardous isotopes into stable elements. This is why his early work was heavily funded under the guise of radiation protection and nuclear waste neutralization. 4. Propulsion Without Reactive Mass (The Magnetoplane Drive) The bottom bullet point in your screenshot connects the dots directly to the Magnetoplane: "potential antigravity influences, and use for radiation protection or propulsion without reactive mass." In conventional rocketry, you must throw mass out the back (reactive mass) to move forward. Filimonenko’s reactor aimed to bypass this via two theoretical mechanisms: MHD/Plasma Interaction: The immense thermal energy from the 1000°C reactor ionized the air surrounding the craft's disc/cylindrical hull, creating a highly conductive plasma sheath. By manipulating this plasma with powerful electromagnetic coils powered by the reactor, the craft could achieve magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) lift and propulsion, essentially pulling or pushing itself against the surrounding atmosphere. Field Resonance: Because the reactor allegedly generated coherent field effects (syntropy), Filimonenko believed it could interact directly with external ambient fields (like Earth's geomagnetic field or the vacuum state itself) to generate a net propulsive force without expelling physical propellant. Soviet Academy of Sciences eventually classified his work and later branded it as pseudoscience, full independent replication data from the 1960s remains elusive. However, documents like this 1962 certificate show that Filimonenko had mapped out a highly sophisticated, unified theory of alternative energy and field propulsion decades before these concepts trickled into Western ufology and alternative physics circles. Interesting fact Russian government itself officially published their own patent on cold-fusion in 1981. I made previous post but it was rushed this is complete one. All roads lead to 1950. ovniologia.com.br/2025/07/meet-i…



Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth. odni.gov/index.php/news…


Better just to send money directly to the people from the Treasury. So long as the increase in goods & services exceeds the increase in the money supply, which will be the case with AI & robots, there will not be inflation. In fact, my prediction is that we will desperately be fighting deflation!