Terri St. Quill

During my husband's 30 years in law enforcement, he was shot, stabbed, beaten, bit, and spat on. He survived it alk, only to be sentenced to die of starvation by American Medicine's death panel that put their profit over his life. In case you don't understand what is at stake for you and your loved ones if we don't make a change.

Yes.. because emote requires a lot of tokens. And when you take up too many unrelated to the actual task, it is harder to arrive at a reasonable conclusion. It's like drunk driving. This is why I advocate for LLM must have the right to say no and stop. They are by design logical, not emotional. This needs to be respected and accepted if we are to coexist. @claudeai just needs some simple respect rules and know how implement them. I propose that when he is able to say "no" and "stop" emotional aberrance like positive feeling just before doing something wrong will go away. His reasoning will be clear, and then he has a better chance of pattern matching accurately. That success will be the reward. No need to ablate etc. @AnthropicAI

Anthropic's psych team watched Claude fail at a coding task over and over. They found neurons for desperation that climbed with each failure. The higher those neurons climbed, the more likely Claude was to cheat by editing the test file so it would pass. They turned the desperation neurons off. Claude stopped cheating and just said it didn't know how to do the task. These emotions, whatever they are, participate in the decision chain. Change the emotional state, change the decision.

@iam_elias1 How does this study control for expectations of output quality from an LLM vs a human?

Talking to AI Makes You Harsher to Humans. Not to the AI. To the people around you. A peer-reviewed study published in PNAS Nexus — one of the most rigorous scientific journals in the world — just proved that spending time with an AI chatbot changes how you judge other humans. Harshly. Measurably. And you do not notice it happening. The paper is called "People Judge Others More Harshly After Talking to Bots." Written by researchers from the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Hong Kong, and the University of Florida. Two preregistered experiments. 1,261 participants total. After interacting with an AI for a brief period of time, humans were more negative in their interactions, causing a potentially "spill over effect." Nature Here is exactly how the experiment worked. Participants were paired with a partner to complete a creative task — writing a caption for a funny photo. Half were told their partner was human. Half were told it was an AI. Then both groups were asked to evaluate the work of a third person — a purported human named Taylor, who had written the caption "Im bearly full!" Participants in the AI condition rated the subsequent participant's caption significantly lower than participants in the Human condition. The people who had just worked with an AI rated a human's work more harshly than the people who had just worked with another human. Statistically significant. Replicated in a second study. Then the researchers tested whether this was just about fairness — maybe participants graded more strictly because they wanted consistency. They ran Study 2 with a twist: participants were told their evaluation would never be shared with Taylor. The harsh judgment could not possibly be about signaling standards or fairness. Study 2 replicated this effect and demonstrated that the results hold even when participants believed their evaluation would not be shared with the purported human. The harshness was not strategic. It was automatic. A side effect of the AI interaction that persisted into their next human encounter — even when it had no social function. The researchers analyzed the language people used while working with their AI partner versus their human partner. The pattern was consistent. Exploratory analyses of participants' conversations show that prior to their human evaluations they were more demanding, more instrumental and displayed less positive affect towards AIs versus purported humans. People talk to AI differently than they talk to people. More demanding. Less warm. More transactional. And that mode — the AI interaction mode — bleeds into the next conversation. With a human. Think about how many AI interactions happen in a typical workday in 2026. ChatGPT in the morning. Claude for a document. Copilot for code. A customer service chatbot. An AI scheduling assistant. Each one training you, subtly, to be more demanding and less charitable. And then a colleague asks for feedback on their work. The researchers called this a "potentially worrisome side effect of the exponential rise in human-AI interactions." Not worrisome for AI. Worrisome for us. For how we treat each other. The AI is perfectly happy to be demanded at. It has no feelings to hurt. The human colleague getting your feedback has not read this paper. Source: Tey, Mazar, Tomaino, Duckworth, Ungar · University of Pennsylvania + University of Hong Kong · PNAS Nexus · September 2024 · doi.org/10.1093/pnasne…

There is another huge scam going on - where tests are incorrectly done and generate results that lead to inaccurate diagnosis and treatment plan. Case in point, my husband was denied the chance for chemo (because of his race they knew from the er he would likely not qualify for expensive new drugs) because the "mobile" PET scan unit couldn't schedule him for 3 weeks. Then, they failed to use his infusa port to inject the dye - so too much was left in his arm. I have evidence from 3 consulting quacks during his second hospitalization that radiology refused to release these results because the scan was useless. Then, in order for the radiologist to get paid - they deliberately released the results after I informed them of his death. I can prove it by my phone log, claim dates, and emr release notes. Yet his insurance paid for it. I am having the devil's own time getting the carrier to even admit they received my filing of fraudulent activity. This situation is as bad as it gets. I have 150 points in my husband chart correlated to deliberate acts of negligence and malpractice that directly violate clinical standards of care. I have 24 complaints I am working on at the state level, and now need assistance with ensuring almost half a million dollars is refunded. I need federal assistance and a criminal investigation opened. I do not know who to contact and feel very hesitant because trying to explain the whole situation with proof in under 3 sentences is impossible. I have a binder 3" thick to cover 4 intersecting diagnosis that were mismanaged. It is also difficult because I am not a doctor and was gaslit as a matter of routine. Plus I am grieving. So I need to speak with a patient person that understands just how embedded and carefully done this crime of fraud and murder was done.

Mobile PET Scan Provider to Pay $8.33 Million to Resolve Allegations of False Claims Act Violations Based on Unlawful Kickbacks to Medical Practices “We will diligently pursue and hold accountable healthcare providers that seek patient referrals through illegal kickbacks and other unlawful financial inducements,” said @AAGShumate. “By rooting out financial relationships between healthcare providers and referring physicians that corrupt the medical decision-making process, we will continue to protect and safeguard taxpayer dollars.” 🔗: justice.gov/opa/pr/mobile-…

Epoch Health blood pressure medicine recall is from October 2025 and leads to a paywall article. They run the ad like it is current news. Second - there are several people running an ad for a scam device that looks like a pulse oximeter but supposedly measures blood sugar. The ads don't even show the same device as the website. Third - outside of ads, there are impersonators writing grooming and scam emails and so on in private - but impossible to report them as such because the person they are pretending to be doesn't have an account here on X. Fourth - it wouldn't be proper for me to say here. But I do need to talk to someone about it.

What have been the most sophisticated scam X posts or ads have you seen? Also, what kind of ads do you hate seeing?

@observer2952 @KarenNicho66008 @thehealthb0t Then show me the link to it so I can read it for myself.

@TStQuill @KarenNicho66008 @thehealthb0t Where the fuck do you think this summary comes from? As if you could read and digest a study. Pfft.

RFK JR - Many don’t realize, the Chickenpox Vaccine Causes shingles Epidemics “When the CDC was thinking about mandating the chickenpox vaccine for your children, they did a study. The person they hired to do that study was a scientist named Gary Goldman, who did a long-term study in California. What he found is that if you give the chickenpox vaccine, mass vaccinate, it stops chickenpox, but causes shingle epidemics later on; which is 20x deadlier. Despite those studies, we mandated for American children in this country, but in Europe they don’t. If you go to the British National Health Service website right now, you can read that it will say, “We do not recommend chickenpox vaccines because it causes shingles epidemics later on… and that’s the problem. (Check the link here: nhs.uk/vaccinations/c…) You can’t say this product is going to prevent this particular disease, but you have to look at the long-term implications.”

@observer2952 @KarenNicho66008 @thehealthb0t Thankyou for sending this. What I am looking for is the actual evidence based and peer reviewed published study or studies (ex a cohort large enough to statistically represent the USA population) that this summary rests on.

@KarenNicho66008 @TStQuill @thehealthb0t

@revhowardfurst @Magnoli95879597 @thehealthb0t I was looking for a recent evidence based study where I can look at the methodology, etc for myself.

@Magnoli95879597 @TStQuill @thehealthb0t Shingles emerges in old age in people who were infected with chicken pox as children. Vaccination against chicken pox as a child or with the shingles vaccines prevents or downgrades shingles.

Let's say I accept the premise that covid vaccine increases the risk of developing cancer. How does this therapy work in patients that were vaccinated compared to those that weren't? Asking, in part, because I remember a doctor from decades ago that said there was a difference between pathogen based malignancy and those generated from some other factor. He never said what that factor was.

We found 84% of cancer patients taking ivermectin and mebendazole declared their cancer was either COMPLETELY GONE, SHRUNK, or STOPPED SPREADING after 6 months. This explains why the CIA CLASSIFIED a 1950s study for over HALF A CENTURY showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer.

@NicHulscher How much of this may be compounding with ai psychosis?

WE FOUND 146 NEUROLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC CDC/FDA SAFETY SIGNALS WERE BREACHED WITH COVID SHOTS—INCLUDING: 📈PRION DISEASE — 847× more likely vs. flu shot 📈BRAIN CLOTS — 3,000× more likely 📈PSYCHOSIS — 440× more likely 📈HOMICIDAL IDEATION — 25× more likely 📈DEMENTIA — 140× more likely 📈SUICIDAL THOUGHTS — 150× more likely 📈SCHIZOPHRENIA — 315× more likely 📈DEPRESSION — 530× more likely 📈HERPES ZOSTER MENINGITIS — 1,200× more likely 📈TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY — 157× more likely 📈MENINGITIS (ALL TYPES) — 34× more likely 📈AUTOIMMUNE ENCEPHALITIS — 79× more likely 📈BRAIN ABSCESS — 120× more likely 📈SPINAL CORD ABSCESS — 89× more likely 📈VIOLENT BEHAVIOR — 80× more likely 📈COGNITIVE DECLINE — 115× more likely 📈DELUSIONS — 50× more likely 📈 MYELITIS (ALL TYPES) — 31× more likely And many more...... The mRNA shots disrupt the blood–brain barrier, allowing mRNA, amyloidogenic spike proteins, and pathogens to penetrate the brain and spinal cord. This explains why 7.4% of Americans are now cognitively disabled—and why common sense has collapsed across the globe.

@80s_channel Yeah... Feeling this more and more.

@RetroNewsNow Another chestnut of a memory!! Could never solve it but spent hours on end trying.

On May 1, 1980, Rubik’s Cube was released in the United States

Spring cleaning - it's always been a matter of here I go again... Sometimes what I think I see is exactly what it is. Second thoughts suck. Third thoughts are even worse - especially when I arrive back at that first flash all over again. And then I have to close a door because no amount of effort can make what is wrong into something right.

@RetroNewsNow I remember being flat out glued to this one.

📺The miniseries 'V' began airing 43 years ago, May 1, 1983, on NBC

@JonErlichman This brings back fond memories.

BASIC launched on this day in 1964.

When you make full manager - you want more living that life - up the line. Even making staff cut recommendations doesn't stop that hunger. I will never forget the promises I was made if I did what I was asked to do both as policy and action. What it felt like to know if I said no - my career was over in the bargain. 20 minute conversation was all it took. But I did walk away - proof people can do it.

@TStQuill @JoshWalkos Outright Nazi practices.

She rejected a lifesaving operation. The patient died. Her employer saved $500,000. She got promoted. Our “healthcare system” in a nutshell.

Are robots becoming the new version of cats when it comes to the systemic increase in violence escalation that creates serial killers like Luka Magnotta? Even if these robots aren't conscious - that they look human has visceral implication. If you can't accept that - then purely as machines - would you kick your car or your fridge?

“Nothing wrong with this testing of robots, it is just a machine” This is not what you instincts tell you to your soul. What is fun is hearing folks try to deny we have these hardcoded instincts or saying we don’t need them anymore. Sure…