Sa-Vesh

@BwalaDaniel Does this guy really think anyone believes or respects him ? Ha! @BwalaDaniel , no one — not even in your APC — sees you as a human being.

In 2019 he was public about it; In 2023 he was hypocritically private about it masquerading as a journalist; meanwhile he has zero training or experience as a journalist. In 2027, he is wickedly pretentious about it. Social media vitriol, hate and revenue is more important to him than national interest. #comeoutofthepoliticalpartisancloset

@SundayDareSD Tinubu and “performance” in the same sentence ? What a perfect oxymoron !

Interview: Recently, I featured on 60 Minutes with Mr. Kay on News Central TV to discuss the performance of the Tinubu administration especially the journey from Reforms to Recovery in key sectors of the Economy. The two Bretton Woods institutions among others have acknowledged the success of these reforms. @Dolusegun16 @OfficialAPCNg @AyoOyalowo @AdaAnambra2023 Here is the interview: youtu.be/9I4jlb6olmQ?si…

@Omojuwa ‘s fears — that @PeterObi will be his next president—are being confirmed daily as we inch towards 2027 . His heartbeat has become irregular ! @Omojuwa , you don’t have to worry . You’re a VERY POOR man in every sense of the adjective, with zero access to state funds. Peter Obi will use just FOUR years to let you perceive— at least —the aroma of good governance by erecting the pillars of accountable, inclusive and compassionate governance. One: He’ll eliminate NEPOTISM within his FIRST WEEK in office so as to blur the fault lines , and engender a sense of a united Nigeria. He must return Nigeria to the pre-Buhari era where there was NO JOB for ethnic BIGOTS and FOOLS like you ! Two: He’ll reform the electoral process within the first 6 months . That’ll return sovereignty to the citizens , and foster accountable governance, as against the current monarchical structure being run by @GovWike, a poor student of @officialABAT in the infamous school of god-fatherism. Three: He’ll drastically eliminate opulence amongst public office holders by trimming the cost of governance . That has to start from him WITHIN THE FIRST MONTH of inauguration UP TO his last day of the 4th year. He WILL declare his assets FROM DAY 1, and get all HIS MINISTERS TO DO SO! It will NOT be the opaque and FRAUDULENT scheme obtainable under @officialABAT, where the president and his ministers cruise in private jets, whilst POOR citizens, like you , writhe under the insufferable weight of grinding poverty, and become weapons fashioned against their destinies. Four : He’ll address security HEAD-ON using technology, not empty words of condolences and assurances at Nigerian LIGHTLESS airports! And many more of these ! You can see that most of the key governance objectives enumerated above REQUIRE ONLY THE WILL —NOTHING else ! So, do not worry , you imbecile !

You can’t do “church take back your country” in 2026. You know why. You can’t use “structure of criminality” in 2026. You know why. You can attack NADECO in 2026. You know why. Same Peter Obi and his electoral pragmatism. Played Catholics against Anglicans as a governor. Played divisive ethnic games as far back as 13 years ago (see the attached image) Until he ran in 2022, bigotry was never a popular term during Nigerian elections. It was introduced to gaslight others from seeing what was being done.

@OlayinkaLere You guys think we’ll allow you to conquer us , but you’re just mistaken . By next year — around this time — you’ll be back to your village to take care of your smelly hair

FCTA PRESS RELEASE Wike's Aide Clarifies Comment on Channels TV's Okinbaloye Lere Olayinka, Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has clarified one of the comments made by the Minister during yesterday's Media Chat, on Channels Television’s Seun Okinbaloye, saying he only spoke figuratively. Olayinka, in a statement on Saturday, said; "the Minister never meant that he will shoot Seun Okinbaloye. They even spoke on phone today, and he (Okinbaloye) understood what the minister meant." "What the minister meant, which he made clear during the media chat was that he was angry seeing Okinbaloye, whom he hold in high esteem as a journalist, descending into the political arena by speaking as an interested party, instead of an interviewer. "The statement made by the Minister was in hyperbolic context, which was clearly without intent. It was primarily using exaggeration to make a point. "Even after the Minister made the clarifications on the live television program, which had Chamberlain Uzor, Head of Channels Television’s Abuja Office as part of the interviewers, all the journalists who were interviewing him just laughed. "Therefore, after the Minister detailed explanations of what he meant, including saying on the live television program that he didn't mean that he will carry gun and shoot the television anchor, it will become a clear hatchet job for any individual or group to pick the statement out of context and make any issue out of it. "The public is therefore urged to discontenance the use of the comment as instrument of blackmail and propaganda by those whose intent is to misrepresent facts for their political gains," he said. Lere Olayinka Senior Special Assistant Public Communications and Social Media April 4, 2026

@ShehuSani You’re jittery already ?

Those who are critical of those who took our security issues to the US Congress are now working towards taking our elections issues to the US Congress.I hope when the congress sends a delegation to work with Inec you’ll be ok with the outcome.But first try and find the out if the Republican dominated Congress is interested in our elections.

@Omojuwa Listen to this honest comment by your brother. Meanwhile, those blackmails have become hackneyed

@BolajiADC Great 👍 @NelsonEgwemi

BREAKING ADC is taking its fight for democracy global. As part of our efforts to strengthen international engagement, we are establishing a Special Representatives Network across key global capitals to engage foreign governments, amplify credible information about Nigeria’s political environment, and counter one-sided government narratives. This comes amid growing attacks on our members, attempts to undermine our leadership, and efforts to restrict political participation ahead of the 2027 General Elections. Our representatives will engage foreign governments, international media, democracy institutions, and the Nigerian diaspora, providing regular briefings on political developments, human rights concerns, and electoral integrity. We are also launching a National Documentation Initiative to systematically track and report incidents affecting political participation across Nigeria. From Washington DC to London, Brussels to Addis Ababa, ADC is building a global platform for accountability. Nigeria’s democracy must be seen, heard, and defended everywhere.

@TheSerahIbrahim It’s the power of brown envelope. @GovWike has and wields brown envelopes .

Wike told journalists that he would have shot Seun Okinbaloye, their fellow journalists and rather than viciously cautioning him for such vulgarity, the journalists sat down there laughing hysterically with him Our journalists here are such idiots Money hungry sell outs. A shame Channels TV must as a matter of urgency release a statement on this.

@BwalaDaniel @TProgressivesNG Aren’t you ever ashamed??

Later tomorrow, I will be joining a wonderful team of young passionate Nigerians from @TProgressivesNG to dissect issues relating to the polity and the essentially, the government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu See you there!!!

@SavvyRinu And the “mourners” applauded sheepishly

VIDEO: If I keep talking, we will miss our way, And you don't have accommodation for us. - Tinubu tells victims of terror attack in Plateau,

@Balatic Exactly ! That’s what I’ve been explaining to some of my colleagues

The bar, you’re an excellent lawyer. But you don’t seem to fully grasp Tinubu’s capacity for evil. I’m not a lawyer but from the little I know from Nigeria’s politics, someone clearly sponsored Nafiu Bala to file that suit at the particular trial court, to be handled by a judge under their payroll. My guess is they aimed for the trial judge to give a shocking ruling (in favour of Nafiu, of course) close to the time for selecting candidates. ADC would then be in disarray. They would be handicapped. Even if they appealed and eventually got a judgement either at the appeal court or the Supreme Court, it’d be too little too late because the boat would have already sailed. So ADC clearly understood this game and took a route that would buy them some time—so they can at least have candidates of their choice. Seeing ADC had outsmarted them in that game, they now unleashed INEC in their desperation. The aim is to have the wrong national chairman of the ADC during the period for selection of candidates. If you follow legal procedures dogmatically in a lawless country with a compromised judiciary, you’re done 📌

Remember, INEC is also a party to the case . So all that the Court of Appeal ordered was that they’d go back to the Federal High Court; leave the state of affairs of ADC the WAY THEY WERE AS AT THE TIME Nafiu approached the Federal High Court . ( That’s what’s called status quo) Leaving the state of affairs of ADC as it existed prior to litigation ( with David Mark leading the interim NWC) wouldn’t render the judgment negatory . Do you know why ? That position isn’t a perishable position . Nafiu can be declared the chairman after the conclusion of the case , if the Federal High Court determines that he’s the rightful person . But with what Amupitan has done now , the judgment of the Federal High Court may be rendered nugatory IF THE JUDGMENT DOES NOT COME BEFORE 10 May, 2026. The reason is that all activities of ADC , including electronic registration and congresses, going by Amupitan’s action, will be put on hold . In effect, there will be NO ADC on the ballots, regardless of whoever gets judgment. But more importantly, remember that ADC wasn’t WITHOUT leadership when Nafiu went to court . But by Amupitan’s action , ADC now has NO leadership! That’s certainly NOT the pre-litigation status of ADC @_MrChima , do you understand? That’s simple ! Isn’t it ?

@VeshSa @SalamHammed12 @ChidiOdinkalu @inecnigeria @abati1990 So what would you have done differently considering the court requested it to be status quo ante bellum and not to do anything that would render the GH case nugatory? Let's hear your take.

This is the judgment & order that @inecnigeria's Joash Amupitan turned into a thunderstrike. The terms are plain enough.

😂😂🙈You must be impressed, right ? I don’t use AI ; neither am I a social media robot . That’s just how I write — coherently ! I used to be a litigation lawyer — I’d done that for close to a decade —before I pivoted to the corporate walls . BUT I can assure you that I’ll soon get back to my forte . Thank you, Mislaw

You should really be ashamed of yourself here. You are using AI to respond to what you could have used your own intelligence to process. The delusional lines and AI patterns here clear show you dont even understand the limits of AI. Sorry, i dont engage with social media bots. I should have prefered humans who use their brains for intelligent human conversations🤣🤣🤣

For a moment, I forgot he is the INEC Chairman and thought he was the APC spokesperson. Where is the neutrality expected of an election umpire? 🤔

@FieldCommando @begundedaniel @OlayinkaLere You’re the one that didn’t read because you’re an imbecile . Go back to the gutters — your habitat

@begundedaniel @OlayinkaLere There is no waiver there...I don't know what you are reading 😂

Na the same day David Mark and Baba Kabiru joined ADC dem become Chairman and Secretary. Na desperation wey make dem no read ADC Constitution make dem do GBAJUE (419) for them 😂😂😂

@SalamHammed12 , I hope you understand what is being discussed here . David Mark lost an interlocutory appeal against a directive of the Federal High Court asking him to show cause why the prayers in the ex parte application should not be granted. Nothing else ! What we’re saying is that in the FINAL orders made by the Court of Appeal ( you can read them), there’s nothing in them that says Prof should create anarchy in the ADC by literally sacking its leadership I

@VeshSa @ChidiOdinkalu @inecnigeria @abati1990 You are not fair to prof., read the frame three you will see that David mark lost and was asked to pay 2million naira to Nafiu.

Sorry , there’s nothing you’ve said here. Very warped and laughable view actually . Maybe you’d consider taking this “ analysis” down — it’s not only illogical , but makes a mockery of procedure . The time INEC uploaded David Mark -led NWC on it’s website — that is 5 clear days after Nafiu went to court — ( a post-litigation action) CAN’T be relevant date in determining what was status quo ante bellum ? What should be relevant is the status of the leadership BEFORE Nafiu went to court— when the crisis began . Who was the chairman at that time BEFORE the suit ? Was ADC without leadership? How can INEC go to reverse what you said occurred after Nafiu went to court under the pretext of enforcing status quo ? INEC should be looking at when the correspondence from ADC was received , communicating the leadership change ( that’s the pre-litigation status) Stop putting out these heaps of thrash as analysis . I know for sure that sound legal minds will be ashamed upon reading wherever “analysis😂” you said you made elsewhere What’s that? I may just be dealing with one of those many two-bit lawyers I think I’ve said enough ! ✌️

I will respond to your lay points with a view to EDUCATING. You should read carefully and pay attentiom with zero emotions. It is an analysia i made somewhere and I will just paste below: "Again, I will use facts to break down status quo ante bellum here. 1) What took Nafiu to Court on 2nd Septemeber was leadership of David and co. 2) So, he filed his suit on 2nd September. That is the date the "war" commenced in the legal sense. Therefore, the status quo ante bellum requires the restoration of the situation as it existed on 2nd Sept 2025. What was that situation? David Mark leadership of ADC was disputed and he was being challenged not to parade himself. 3) However, INEC had not yet officially recognized or uploaded the David Mark leadership onto its portal as of 2nd Sept 2025 (you can fast check this) when Nafiu suit was filled. 4l The David Mark-led NWC was only uploaded to INEC's portal on 9th Sept 2025 - a full 7 days after the lawsuit was filed. Please fast check again. 5) The Court of AC's preservatory order required that nothing be done to change the situation after the legal dispute began. Since INEC's official recognition (the portal upload) occurred after the filing date, that act was caught by the preservatory order. Consequently, INEC had to reverse that post-filing action, which meant deleting the names uploaded on 9th September."

There’s NOTHING brilliant about what he said. I assume you’re a lawyer , right ? Let me volunteer few lines for you . 1. Take this hypothetical instance : If you’re installed a king , and someone approached the court , challenging your installation as the king , would an order for maintenance of status quo mean that you’d be dethroned pending the determination of the case ? 2. Do you know why the Court of Appeal ordered accelerated hearing ? The reasons: One, issuing an injunctive order that INEC or anyone should cease recognizing David Mark-led interim NWC would amount to determining the case in limine ( before the merit of the case is actually heard) , considering that one of the MAIN/PRINCIPAL reliefs sought by Nafiu is that David Mark shouldn’t be recognized. 3. You know, injunctive remedies are not legal remedies ; they’re equitable remedies that seek to preserve the res ( I’m using legalese on the assumption that you’re a lawyer . Pardon me, if you’re not ) 4. Two, the position in question is not perishable. So, contrary to the misleading argument by Prof Amupitan, there’s NOTHING that can happen between the time the Court of Appeal gave judgment, ordering accelerated hearing , to when the Federal High Court will decide the substance of the Originating Summons that will foist a fait accompli ( position of helplessness) on the Federal High Court. ( For instance , will the position of National Chairman cease to exist ? The answer: No!) 5. In determining whether or not to grant such interlocutory injunctive remedies, these are some of the considerations: (a) whether irreparable damages will be suffered by the applicant,(b) balance of convenience, etc. 6. Now, the questions for Amupitan ( you can see I’ve dropped the “Prof” cos I’m getting angrier with him as I proceed): (a) Which order of the Court of Appeal mandated INEC to stop recognizing David Mark-led interim NWC? ( Answer: No order !) (b) Was the order for maintenance of status quo directed at INEC to enforce ( Answer: No!) (c) In order words , did you hear Amupitan himself even claim in this interview that the Court mandated INEC to literally sack David Mark -led interim NWC? ( Answer: No!) (d) So, where did Amupitan derive the powers to drop the David Mark-led NWC? 8. Relate the rest of my explanations here to the hypothetical scenario in Paragraph 1 , and you’ll get the clear picture. 7. My brother , I know Amupitan very well.( I won’t expose the personal relationship) .I can tell you that he’s struggling with basic principles of procedural law in this interview . 8.Kindly also note that there’s NOTHING like “subject matter expert” amongst Nigerian elites.

He has not said anything untoward or subjective here. It is because many of you are not used to INEC Chair speaking directly to issues like this. Previous Chairmen were not lawyers and it was understandable if they were not this directly expository on legal matters. The current INEC Chairman is a subject-matter expert and Senior Advocate of Nigeria. He has done an excellent job here speaking directly, brilliantly, and objectively to the issues. Folks should get used to this. We must commend him for being so forthright and for not leaving the narratives to muschievous and lazy folks to run. Kudos to him.

@dawisu Thinking about the same thing

@omoluabi1sq He has only one signature, and that’s the one on his resignation letter . The other signature is one he cannot repeat In any event, he has an uphill task of proving fraud in an originating summons . It’s not easy That’s why INEC has stepped in to aid him in the fight

I have taken my time to review the 3 available signatures of Nafiu Bala and I honestly cannot see the familiarity in the signatures. 1st signature is on letter head, second is on a memo while the 3rd is the resignation letter which he had since denied. I think this man signs different signatures for different purposes. The signature he claims is fake may after all end up not being fake if properly investigated