Senor

14.7K posts

Senor banner
Senor

Senor

@basedsenorito

Acapurria enthusiast. Kyle Schwarber guy.🇵🇷🇵🇷🇵🇷

参加日 Mayıs 2017
301 フォロー中241 フォロワー
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@strxwmxn Lmao “sensible” Points to tweet about us needing to continue to spend on another country’s defense
English
0
0
0
1
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@neeratanden You are so dumb you think the Dems have anything to do with it. Their favorability is still the worst it’s ever been
Senor tweet media
English
0
0
0
8
Neera Tanden🌻
Neera Tanden🌻@neeratanden·
I missed how every Dem leader went on Hasan Piker's show to make this happen. Just like there are very few Dems on Joe Rogan and Trump is still dropping with young people. The truth is no podcaster controls whole blocks of voters. This debate has become divorced from reality.
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022

Trump approval (ages 18-34 only) Approve: 20% Disapprove: 80% —— Trend (net) 🟤 Feb. 2025: (-16) 🟤 Jan. 2026: (-39) 🔴 Mar. 2026: (-60) CNN/SSRS | 3/26-30

English
302
150
739
602.4K
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@BillAckman @X My only question is when is your nephew enlisting for the war in Iran you wanted so bad?
English
0
0
0
19
Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman@BillAckman·
I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?
English
8.8K
948
17.6K
6.2M
The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post@Jerusalem_Post·
Opinion: It is time for Mamdani to stand in solidarity with Muslim leaders who eschew antisemitic tropes, such as “genocide” and “occupation,” and are committed to a new and broader regional alignment in the Middle East. jpost.com/opinion/articl…
English
268
11
34
261.4K
MB
MB@MBerk88·
@JKush33 @TommyKelly44 How many championships has he won for the team? How many conference Finals has he taken the team to? How many more years are we going to keep hoping and praying that someday one of these things will come true? How many games when he doesn't play? Is he nowhere to be found?
English
2
0
0
37
Tom Kelly
Tom Kelly@TommyKelly44·
I totally side with Morey and the Sixers here. It is sad that still at this point in his career Embiid doesn’t understand why going to shoot around and film sessions are important even after Maxey called him out last year. But as usual Joel is the victim and it’s not his fault
NBC Sports Philadelphia@NBCSPhilly

"I was pissed off. I wanted to play basketball." 😳 Joel Embiid did not hold back when asked about his availability Wednesday night against the Wizards.

English
17
3
14
6K
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@Ky_Carlin Man fuck outta here. He scored 0 points in an elimination game.
English
0
0
10
107
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
Minimum a team worse -24 and it’s felt worse
English
0
0
0
9
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
Embiid is out and the Sixers look like garbage. Surprising lol
English
0
0
0
81
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
Sixers need to simply stop playing Andre Drummond. He absolutely destroys your defense. Just play Barlow at small ball 5
English
0
0
2
150
John Podhoretz
John Podhoretz@jpodhoretz·
Hasan Piker would likely support Tim Miller’s murder on the grounds that he is gay man with children. And then support the murder of his children, as he supports the murder of mine for being Jews. Nice going, Tim. You’ve sold your soul. Enjoy the cash.
English
968
33
650
1.6M
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@KobeissiLetter Lmao he will make up a reason to extend it before markets open Monday
English
0
0
0
148
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: President Trump says Iran has 48 hours to open the Strait of Hormuz or "all hell will reign down on Iran." "Remember when I gave Iran ten days to make a deal... time is running out," Trump says.
The Kobeissi Letter tweet media
English
993
936
7.2K
1.2M
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@MinkaB6170 11 minutes for Michkov and Bump. Sigh
English
0
0
2
25
Minka
Minka@MinkaB6170·
Play the kids
English
1
0
7
164
Franchise Playa
Franchise Playa@BlxckHammer·
@PHLY_Sixers No fool you make the decisions. Stop shirking responsibilities as a franchise player. No star player who wants to play is allowing this nonsense
English
3
0
1
991
PHLY Sixers
PHLY Sixers@PHLY_Sixers·
Joel Embiid was asked about why he didn't play against Washington on Wednesday. He did not hold back. "I was pissed off. I wanted to play basketball. I wasn't allowed to play basketball. I think this is more of a question for Daryl Morey." Full answer 👇
English
25
39
284
196.1K
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@SpikeEskin My guess is that if the Sixers go out quick, Embiid’s contract is hard to move (still wonder if the Warriors would), in that case I guess Nurse/Morey go?
English
0
0
0
128
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@SpikeEskin I think there is probably also some bubbling frustration between Joel and Daryl over the don’t duck the tax thing. The relationship has probably been broken since Joel said they forced him to play with the knee. Who wins the battle between Embiid and Nurse/Morey?
English
3
0
5
1.1K
Spike Eskin
Spike Eskin@SpikeEskin·
My tea leaf reading analysis of what's going on with the Embiid/Sixers/Morey sickness thing over the last several days and its relationship to the bigger picture between them.
English
34
13
202
49.1K
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@ShayKhatiri Have you tried talking to the manager about it? Bluesky is that way ——->
English
0
0
0
29
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@KyleNeubeck Bob Myers get ready to learn Philadelphian
English
0
0
12
588
Senor
Senor@basedsenorito·
@RBPhillyTake Makes sense. I suspect what happened was Embiid said he was too sick for film session, Nurse/Morey got pissed and then ruled him out.
English
1
0
3
215