コココ⿻
82.8K posts


あいつらこれさえ、
憲法13条の『身体への侵襲を受けない自由』 に反してるとか言い出しそうだよな。
コココ⿻@cococoiz
仮に、身体的負担がほとんどなく、錠剤を飲むだけでセックス(生物学的性別)が本当に変わる医療が実現したとする。 その時に「女性として扱われたいが、その治療は受けない」と言うなら、問題ははっきりする。 その人は、セックスを変えたいのではない。
日本語
コココ⿻ がリツイート

なぜこういうことが男だけで決められていくのか。
男にとっての快適さしか話し合わない時点でアウトでしょ。
錆@sabigaranoneko
性別不合の診断と治療のポイント 「このように診断名が変わるとともに定義も大きく変わりました」 「これは医療で身体を変化させるホルモン療法や手術療法で治療することだけではなく、社会の仕組みとして性の不一致に伴う困難を解決することも含めることを意味します」 (日医雑誌 2026年2月)
日本語
コココ⿻ がリツイート

Most people miss this:
If a woman says, “I feel unsafe with men in this space,” and that still isn’t enough to keep men out, why does a man saying, “I feel uncomfortable being excluded,” suddenly become a “civil rights” emergency?
This bullshittery is so blatant, it’s an insult to double standards.
Women’s discomfort gets waved off as irrational, hysterical, “jealous,” or relabeled “bigotry.”
Men’s discomfort with being told “no” gets treated like a problem that everyone else has a moral obligation to solve.
Pick a damn lane.
Either discomfort matters, or it doesn’t.
But here’s the trick: this isn’t actually about comfort. It’s about safety.
And despite how often men-who-think-they’re-women scream, “I’m not safe for us in the men’s room!!!”… reality shows that they 100% are.
Women, however, are NOT safe with men in our intimate spaces.
Every person with a functioning brain stem knows this.
But for the brainstem-impaired, allow me to spell out the obvious:
It’s biology.
Yeah—the biology people want to pretend is irrelevant because of men’s feelings.
Their feelings don’t change the fact that women can be impregnated, which makes potential rape—BIOLOGICALLY SPEAKING—an even bigger threat than it already is.
Their feelings don’t change immutable factors like arm length, grip strength, airway size, heart size, and lung capacity, which mean—BIOLOGICALLY SPEAKING—95% of men are physically capable of killing 90% of women using only their bare hands.
Their feelings don’t change the fact that—BIOLOGICALLY SPEAKING—women don’t urinate standing up. We have to partially undress and assume a physically vulnerable position to do it.
And their feelings don’t change the fact that this means women don’t have the same —ahem—"backup options” if we need to relieve ourselves:
Such as an alleyway, a bottle, or whatever other semi-private workaround men can and do use with relative ease.
But, funnily enough, I don’t hear people talk about those realities very often, even within this debate.
What I hear is:
“Sex and gender are different!!!”
Okay. Cool.
Then why does your “gender identity”—literally defined as a deep, intrinsic FEELING—override women’s biological realities and the safety needs that follow from them?
Why is the EMOTIONAL discomfort of men treated as more important than the PHYSICAL safety of women?
And if women’s safety and boundaries aren’t “valid enough” to justify separation...
Then men’s feelings of exclusion aren’t “valid enough” to demand inclusion, either.
So which is it?
Because right now the message is loud and clear:
Women’s comfort is optional.
Men’s comfort is decisive.
And women’s safety?
…that’s not even a consideration.
So the only question left is:
How long are we going to let it stay that way??
English
コココ⿻ がリツイート
コココ⿻ がリツイート
コココ⿻ がリツイート
コココ⿻ がリツイート

これを見るだけで、共産党はもうだめだって分かるじゃないですか。もうだめだよ。完全にだめだ
椎井蹴人@Cait_Sith_co
共産党の小池晃、話を逸らす。「ご遺族へ」謝罪どころか連絡もないことを皆は指摘してるの。詭弁だ ↓ 記者「活動家達はお詫びもまともに出来ないし社会常識が無い」 小池「ネットで彼らが詫びてないと言われるけど、ヘリ反協は当日の会見で詫びてますよ」
日本語
コココ⿻ がリツイート

Taking to my daughters friends who are in their 20s about the fact I’m a despicable TERF.
Them: “I work with a transwoman and don’t care if they use the same change room and toilet as me!”
Me: You can’t consent for other women though! Should women who are disabled or elderly be able to request a female carer to shower them and do their intimate care?
Them: “Of course!”
Me: Should male rapists be sent to female prisons?
Them: “No”
Me: Congratulations you are all TERFs!
English
コココ⿻ がリツイート




